Ken, Patrick & Mods : What changed at Royal here ?

[FatFrank]

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by THE SHRINK: March 15, 2003 11:41 PM

Intuition Bet,

ROYAL SPORTS isn't even close to being what they once were....

Once ROYAL figures out how they are going to handle their upper management conflicts, then maybe they can survive and become the GIANT the once were...

Until then, I'd stay away from them...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by THE SHRINK: June 05, 2003 02:05 PM

WELCOME BACK ROYAL!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Can any of you tell us readers what changed for the *good* at Royal between March 15, 2003 & June 05, 2003 ?

I've asked before but no one answered...

I say things worsened at Royal concerning their "upper management conflicts" yet in June Royal was welcomed back to TheRx.

 

[FatFrank]

RPM, I would REALLY like your opinion...

 

[Boston1]

It appears it was the 2 slow pays apparently of which both were resolved.???????????//

 

[FatFrank]

Ok...

I say the only thing that happened was Royal gave Ken some Ad $$$.

 

[FatFrank]

Boston1,

Ken did NOT mention anything about slow pays on March 15.

 

[FatFrank]

RPM ???

No need to hide in the Board Room being told what to say

Come out, come out where ever you are...

 

[FatFrank]

Just like I thought... No guts no glory!

There is no moral high ground here with MW, TheRx and Royal. It is all about MONEY.

Nothing all that wrong with that. It is just the way it is.

 

[FatFrank]

So, RPM... When you keep asking why MW still has Royal up on their site: IT IS BECAUSE OF AD $$$$

No less moral than what Ken did on June 05

 

[PatrickMcIrish]

Frank - if you want me to play you have to let me know what it is you are arguing. Not being facetious, I'm not really sure what it is you are suggesting.

 

[FatFrank]

>I'm not really sure what it is you
>are suggesting.

I aint suggesting shitt...

Ken said in March to stay away from Royal because of "upper management conflicts" yet in June while "upper management conflicts" worsened he welcomed Royal back.

I ask you, Pat, why?

I've already gave my reason. (see above)

 

[Amitightornot]

Royal is a solid book!

Its my #3 book.
Your money is safe at Royal!

Trust me!

 

[RPM]

fuk you frank. i wasnt hiding i was on my way home from work.


you want my opinion of what has changed?

simple, when royal came onto the rx, there were ISSUES regarding management. BUT THERE WERE NO SLOW OR NO PAYS GOING ON WITH PLAYERS!!!!

when slow pays started being reported, shrink took them off the site.

EVEN YOU CAN'T POSSIBLY FIND WRONG DOING IN THAT.

 

[RPM]

FRANK,

now let me ask you a question...


WHY ARE YOU HERE STIRRING UP SHIT ABOUT ROYAL???

instead of at mw asking why they continue to let royal advertise there?

 

[TheGeneral+]

>Frank,

>Royal is a questionable book right now & there >is no need to take chances. I do not care if >Shrink thought Popeye was real in March or June. There are issues within at Royal & it is >important to try and warn players.

>Post up! Hopefully we are wrong <>><><><

 

[FatFrank]

>i wasnt hiding

LOL

>there were POSSIBLE ISSUES regarding management

BullShitt!

Re-read what Ken wrote in March.

 

[RPM]

ok, ill edit the word possible. big fuking deal.

guess you wont be answering my questions will you frank.

 

[FatFrank]

>WHY ARE YOU HERE STIRRING UP SHIT ABOUT ROYAL???

Not stirring Royal... It's TheRx I'm stirring!

I'm tired of reading your 'holier than thou' posts. MONEY is why Ken WELCOMED Royal back, PERIOD. There were NO improvement in Royal's "upper management conflicts."

 

[PatrickMcIrish]

You are saying we did the right thing but we did it too late?

 

[BigDeal+]

why is it hard to admit money is why rx took royal back?

 

[FatFrank]

>You are saying we did the right thing but we did it too late for your tastes?

Damnit Pat! Why can't you give a straight answer any longer? If you answer questions with a question we get nowhere...

Ken said in March to stay away from Royal because of "upper management conflicts" yet in June while "upper management conflicts" worsened he welcomed Royal back.

I ask you, Pat, why?