Sorry to insert this.
"22-2" on one hand and 'likely overvalued" on the other. This is why all the math (and statistical) information in the world does not win you money gambling. …… without several other knowledge and "feel" ingredients!
Well my friend..... I can assure you that it works for me. Baseball bettors tend to overvalue recent trends especially with starting pitchers. You seem so confident that I am wrong but you don't know my results. I understand there are lots of different methods for betting baseball...... I was only pointing out one possible angle. I like traditional handicapping as well. Sometimes my own handicapping analysis disagrees very strongly with my models. For the record my system thinks the Giants are valued about right today.
There are different ways to do things but to say that statistical analysis can not make money is just plain false as it has been producing for me for many years. I agree as well that there are things that can not be adequately measured with stats..... that is why I am also always arguing with the sabermetric guys who ignore what is obvious because they cannot quantify it with their stats (stuff like lineup protection and batting order just to name a couple).
But it is hardly an outrageous statement to say that the "public" tends to overvalue whatever just happened over longer term trends...... and I make an OK living based on that.