IS this guy the Owner of True Poker?

Search

The Great Govenor of California
Joined
Feb 21, 2001
Messages
15,972
Tokens
<TABLE class=tableborders cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=3 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=darktable vAlign=top width="17%" rowSpan=2>David Sklansky
adm.gif

Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 08/28/02
Posts: 5092
</TD><TD class=subjecttable width="83%"><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top align=left width="70%">
book.gif
How I Cheated at Poker
#8793599 - 01/17/07 02:57 AM </TD><TD align=right width="30%"><TABLE class=tablesurround border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=navigation style="DISPLAY: none" noWrap>
edit.gif
Edit </TD><TD class=navigation style="DISPLAY: none" noWrap>
reply.gif
Reply </TD><TD class=navigation style="DISPLAY: none" noWrap>
quote.gif
Quote </TD><TD class=navigation style="DISPLAY: none" noWrap> Quick Reply </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD class=lighttable width="83%">
It was about 1974. I had been in Vegas a couple of times before and was now here for good. My best game was hi-lo split but it was almost never played. So I concentrated on blackjack. I found out about a guy who was staking poker players in big games and I approached him with a proposition. Let me bet one or two hundred at Caesar's incredible one deck game and pay me nothing out of the first 5K I won. This proposition interested him because I wouldn't suggest it if I wasn't sure I had an edge.

Because I won him a lot of money, he steered me away from crooked poker games. He didn't stake me in poker because I had money myself. At least enough for 15-30 or 30-60. The bigger games were not something I was yet good enough to expect to be staked in. Except Hi-Lo. In that game I was the best. Period. So when it started to be spread 100-200 and 200-400, I begged him to put me in. He was reluctant because he had to get permission from a partner who didn't know me and because he already was putting in the second and third best players in town.

In spite of that, he thought he would give me a chance as long as I accepted the fact that we were all three playing out of the same bankroll and should adjust our play accordingly. Without that adjustment the others would have had almost no chance anyway but it was his money so he made the rules. If I turned him down I would have lost all opportunity to get into big games for many years.

We won 50K the day he put me in to a 200-400 Hi Lo, No qualifier, game. My end was 10K. But I never played for him again. The other partner decided that me being in the game aroused suspicions, if not of partnerships, at least that there was something about the game I knew that others didn't. Which was true. The other two guys had played a lot bigger than 15-30 so they didn't have that problem. End of Story One.

Story Two occurred shortly after Paradise Poker came online. I dabbled in the 20-40 Holdem a little bit. About that time I bumped into an old ladyfriend I hadn't seen in a while. She was still looking good in spite of her advanced age (32) so I thought I might try to rekindle something. She had a laptop and had independently discovered online poker. She was mediocre but still dreamed of making good money on the side.

Well guess what honey? I think I have a way to speed up the process. I'm going to go home now and call you up on the phone and we are going to get into the SAME GAME (I think it was 10-20 Holdem). And we will tell each other what we have, adjust accordingly and split. Ooh that sounds so EXCITING. So what was I supposed to do? Not go through with it? Meanwhile I was curious as to whether I would be stopped, given I planned to do some flagrant strategy changes. If I was, I didn't care much (this was before the days poker sites were advertising here.)

We played about two hours, won about $400 and I never did it again. Various reasons.

I'm guessing the above post may leave some with a few unanawered questions. But I am not answering any of them. Ever. </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 

I'll be in the Bar..With my head on the Bar
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
9,980
Tokens
Nooooooooo. Thats poker author and noted pervert as well as atheist as well as owner of 2+2 forums....
In other words a big fuckin jerk..

if im not mistaken The Greek owns True Poker
 

Cashier
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
1,098
Tokens
Nooooooooo. Thats poker author and noted pervert as well as atheist as well as owner of 2+2 forums....
In other words a big fuckin jerk..

if im not mistaken The Greek owns True Poker

wtf does that have to do with anything?
 

I'll be in the Bar..With my head on the Bar
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
9,980
Tokens
wtf does that have to do with anything?

Not much to me but he's quite proud of it and rarely a post goes by that he doesnt allude to it in 1 form or other...some of the other questions in that same forum were about advantages that aetheists have over believers due to no conscious and things like that.
 

Cashier
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
1,098
Tokens
I have never known anything about this guy other than he is a phenomenal split player and that he was friends with Doyle.
 

The Great Govenor of California
Joined
Feb 21, 2001
Messages
15,972
Tokens
Its not hard to be an expert in hi-low, you can read 2 paragraphs and your an expert.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,858
Messages
13,574,196
Members
100,878
Latest member
lisasdanceandexercise
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com