- The playoffs are inherently flawed, by putting in small conference teams like James Madison and Tulane, to be fair, inclusive, instead of the best
- Anyone who does not put Georgia in the top 4 is a blind raged SEC hater, they should be #2 and IMO they are better than Indiana--Texas Tech is a good team but I am not impressed with there SOS, beat BYU twice, woop de do
- SEC is the best conference, bar none, almost no easy games every weekend (I did not go to an SEC school), the fact of the matter is it IS the best, bar none. A pity Ole Miss will probably have troubles with Kiffin leaving and all the distractions. Georgia to me is very likely to win it all their young D jelled late, and watch out for A&M. Texas beat a lot of top teams, would be favored over a lot of the teams that will be 8-12 in the brackets, they, too, jelled late (OL) but blew it with 3 losses, they are not going to be in.
Indiana
Georgia
OSU
T Tech
This should be the top four
1. Indiana
2. Ohio State
3. Georgia
4. Texas Tech
A three-loss Alabama should not be in the CFP. They lost to a really bad FSU team, a not so good OU team and Georgia. And the sentiment is that three-loss Texas is out? Texas and Alabama both have three losses. Texas has a better win/loss resume. Alabama did not play well, and Texas did at the end of the season.
JMU had a nice season, but they're not one of the 12 best teams. Neither is Tulane or Duke (five losses-gimme a break). IMO, those three should not be in. Given how things played out yesterday, I think that Notre Dame, Miami and Texas should all be in. No matter what the committee decides to do, some people are going to be unhappy with it. The CFP needs to go to 16 teams next year. It should have been 16 teams in the first place.
1. Indiana
2. Ohio State
3. Georgia
4. Texas Tech
A three-loss Alabama should not be in the CFP. They lost to a really bad FSU team, a not so good OU team and Georgia. And the sentiment is that three-loss Texas is out? Texas and Alabama both have three losses. Texas has a better win/loss resume. Alabama did not play well, and Texas did at the end of the season.
JMU had a nice season, but they're not one of the 12 best teams. Neither is Tulane or Duke (five losses-gimme a break). IMO, those three should not be in. Given how things played out yesterday, I think that Notre Dame, Miami and Texas should all be in. No matter what the committee decides to do, some people are going to be unhappy with it. The CFP needs to go to 16 teams next year. It should have been 16 teams in the first place.
March Madness is what it is because everybody has a chance in a one and done tournament
There are too many flaws with college football scheduling to pretend we know who the best conference is. Stated simply, there are not enough OOC matchups between the top programs after September. Hence we can't possibly know who the best conferences are
And, everybody deserves a shot at the money. You simply can't have it all go to a very few conferences, that helps it all become a self-fulfilling prophecy
Play the games, and you better finish near the top of your conference to earn a shot at the NC (top 3). You don't get in because you played a "tough schedule", you have to win too
There are too many flaws with college football scheduling to pretend we know who the best conference is. Stated simply, there are not enough OOC matchups between the top programs after September. Hence we can't possibly know who the best conferences are
And, everybody deserves a shot at the money. You simply can't have it all go to a very few conferences, that helps it all become a self-fulfilling prophecy
Play the games, and you better finish near the top of your conference to earn a shot at the NC (top 3). You don't get in because you played a "tough schedule", you have to win too
