Iraq said for the first time today that it wanted to set a timetable for the withdrawal of US troops from its territory.
US President George Bush has long resisted any set schedule for pulling his 145,000 soldiers out of Iraq, arguing that it would play into the hands of insurgents. But an emboldened Nouri al-Maliki, the Shia prime minister who last week boasted he had crushed terrorism in Iraq, suggested it was time to start setting timelines.
“The current trend is to reach an agreement on a memorandum of understanding either for the departure of the forces or a memorandum of understanding to put a timetable on their withdrawal," said Mr al-Maliki during a visit to the United Arab Emirates. He rejected efforts by Mr Bush to hurry through an agreement on vital issues such as the immunity of US troops in Iraq and use of the country’s airspace.
Mr Bush had hoped to sign a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) by the end of July to establish the basis for a long-term presence of US troops in the country.
<!--#include file="m63-article-related-attachements.html"--><!-- BEGIN: Module - M63 - Article Related Attachements --><script type="text/javascript"><!-- function pictureGalleryPopup(pubUrl,articleId) { var newWin = window.open(pubUrl+'template/2.0-0/element/pictureGalleryPopup.jsp?id='+articleId+'&&offset=0&§ionName=WorldIraq','mywindow','menubar=0,resizable=0,width=615,height=655'); } //--></script><!-- BEGIN: Comment Teaser Module --><!-- END: Module - M63 - Article Related Attachements --> But the Iraqi parliament has bridled at pushing through such a binding deal with the outgoing and deeply unpopular Bush administration, saying that the negotiations have been secretive and could undermine Iraq’s sovereignty.
“I don’t know anything about this agreement and neither does parliament,” said Ezzedine Dawla, a Sunni MP. “There’s no way we’re going to pass something we don’t know anything about.”
Mr al-Maliki’s announcement showed a growing self-confidence here that Iraqi leaders can stand up to their powerful ally in Washington. His oil minister last week pledged that major western oil companies would not be allowed to set conditions for massive future deals in Iraq’s main natural resource.
The tough stance also comes ahead of Iraqi provincial elections later this year, and may mark the start of the premier’s campaign to be re-elected. His popularity was bolstered by military operations to take back the southern oil city of Basra and the town of al-Amarah from Iranian-backed Shia militias.
The premier’s comments may also hint at future cooperation with Barak Obama, the Democratic candidate who has promised to pull US troops out of Iraq within 16 months of coming to office, although Mr Obama has since appeared to waver on that commitment.
"The negotiations are continuing with the American side," Mr al-Maliki said, reflecting the desire of many MPs to wait until a new administration is in the White House, and Iraq’s provincial elections are over, before making any deal. The agreement would govern such key issues as immunity for US troops from prosecution, the use of Iraqi air space and which side takes operational control for military missions against insurgents.
Mahmoud Othman, an independent Kurdish MP, said the issue of immunity for US forces had become a particularly sensitive subject for Iraqis.
“We have suffered so much from immunity. Immunity equals committing crimes, that’s what we have seen these five years. …In the name of immunity they have killed people, committed crimes, they have their own prisons, they captured Iraqis. We can’t continue like this,” he said.
Haidar al-Abadi, a close aide to the prime minister, said the Americans had wanted almost complete control of Iraqi airspace, since Iraq still has no air force itself. Mr al-Abadi said the government had rejected the demand. “Air space will be decided by Iraqi government and if the US side wants to use that air space, they need a permission of the Iraqi government,” he said.
While Iraqi forces have made great strides in the past year, they have still not been fully tested in battle. In the fight for Basra in April, they needed help from US air power and British artillery, and the outcome was ultimately decided by backdoor talks with the Mahdi Army militia arbitrated by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards.
Mr al-Maliki’s claim to have defeated terrorism was further tested today when a female suicide bomber killed nine people in Baqouba, a town still under threat from Al Qaeda-linked militants, while 16 Iraqis were killed on Sunday in a spate of attacks.
But a senior US military official asserted that, contrary to recent claims by American field commanders that Iraq’s security gains were “fragile,” stability here has not suffered from a pull-out of most of the extra ‘surge’ brigades drafted in last year to pull Iraq back from bloody sectarian war.
"I believe the momentum we have is not reversible," Jack Keane, a retired Army vice chief of staff, told USA Today. Mr Keane, who is close to General David Petraeus, the supreme commander in Iraq, predicted "significant reductions in 2009 whoever becomes president."
US President George Bush has long resisted any set schedule for pulling his 145,000 soldiers out of Iraq, arguing that it would play into the hands of insurgents. But an emboldened Nouri al-Maliki, the Shia prime minister who last week boasted he had crushed terrorism in Iraq, suggested it was time to start setting timelines.
“The current trend is to reach an agreement on a memorandum of understanding either for the departure of the forces or a memorandum of understanding to put a timetable on their withdrawal," said Mr al-Maliki during a visit to the United Arab Emirates. He rejected efforts by Mr Bush to hurry through an agreement on vital issues such as the immunity of US troops in Iraq and use of the country’s airspace.
Mr Bush had hoped to sign a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) by the end of July to establish the basis for a long-term presence of US troops in the country.
<!--#include file="m63-article-related-attachements.html"--><!-- BEGIN: Module - M63 - Article Related Attachements --><script type="text/javascript"><!-- function pictureGalleryPopup(pubUrl,articleId) { var newWin = window.open(pubUrl+'template/2.0-0/element/pictureGalleryPopup.jsp?id='+articleId+'&&offset=0&§ionName=WorldIraq','mywindow','menubar=0,resizable=0,width=615,height=655'); } //--></script><!-- BEGIN: Comment Teaser Module --><!-- END: Module - M63 - Article Related Attachements --> But the Iraqi parliament has bridled at pushing through such a binding deal with the outgoing and deeply unpopular Bush administration, saying that the negotiations have been secretive and could undermine Iraq’s sovereignty.
“I don’t know anything about this agreement and neither does parliament,” said Ezzedine Dawla, a Sunni MP. “There’s no way we’re going to pass something we don’t know anything about.”
Mr al-Maliki’s announcement showed a growing self-confidence here that Iraqi leaders can stand up to their powerful ally in Washington. His oil minister last week pledged that major western oil companies would not be allowed to set conditions for massive future deals in Iraq’s main natural resource.
The tough stance also comes ahead of Iraqi provincial elections later this year, and may mark the start of the premier’s campaign to be re-elected. His popularity was bolstered by military operations to take back the southern oil city of Basra and the town of al-Amarah from Iranian-backed Shia militias.
The premier’s comments may also hint at future cooperation with Barak Obama, the Democratic candidate who has promised to pull US troops out of Iraq within 16 months of coming to office, although Mr Obama has since appeared to waver on that commitment.
"The negotiations are continuing with the American side," Mr al-Maliki said, reflecting the desire of many MPs to wait until a new administration is in the White House, and Iraq’s provincial elections are over, before making any deal. The agreement would govern such key issues as immunity for US troops from prosecution, the use of Iraqi air space and which side takes operational control for military missions against insurgents.
Mahmoud Othman, an independent Kurdish MP, said the issue of immunity for US forces had become a particularly sensitive subject for Iraqis.
“We have suffered so much from immunity. Immunity equals committing crimes, that’s what we have seen these five years. …In the name of immunity they have killed people, committed crimes, they have their own prisons, they captured Iraqis. We can’t continue like this,” he said.
Haidar al-Abadi, a close aide to the prime minister, said the Americans had wanted almost complete control of Iraqi airspace, since Iraq still has no air force itself. Mr al-Abadi said the government had rejected the demand. “Air space will be decided by Iraqi government and if the US side wants to use that air space, they need a permission of the Iraqi government,” he said.
While Iraqi forces have made great strides in the past year, they have still not been fully tested in battle. In the fight for Basra in April, they needed help from US air power and British artillery, and the outcome was ultimately decided by backdoor talks with the Mahdi Army militia arbitrated by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards.
Mr al-Maliki’s claim to have defeated terrorism was further tested today when a female suicide bomber killed nine people in Baqouba, a town still under threat from Al Qaeda-linked militants, while 16 Iraqis were killed on Sunday in a spate of attacks.
But a senior US military official asserted that, contrary to recent claims by American field commanders that Iraq’s security gains were “fragile,” stability here has not suffered from a pull-out of most of the extra ‘surge’ brigades drafted in last year to pull Iraq back from bloody sectarian war.
"I believe the momentum we have is not reversible," Jack Keane, a retired Army vice chief of staff, told USA Today. Mr Keane, who is close to General David Petraeus, the supreme commander in Iraq, predicted "significant reductions in 2009 whoever becomes president."
