Inside Money From a Professional!!!!

Search

InsiderPicks+

New member
Joined
Nov 1, 2004
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
Today we have a much improved Ohio state team playing on the road in wisky, Ohio state likes the outside game and will have trouble scoring in Wisky ( great home defense) Wisky is holding teams to 54 point at home and with wisky leading scorer Injured I see him playing limited minutes and a lower scoring home total for wisky then what we are used to Play the under 135.00. This game is money,

Wisconsin Under 135.
 

themanowesme

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
Time for a new handle!!!!!!:finger:
 
SureGuy

SureGuy

pro gamblererer
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
2,790
Reaction score
0
themanowesme said:
Time for a new handle!!!!!!:finger:
Shoulda been a win. Thats called bad luck. That play wins 9-10 I think. I did not play this game, just watched.
 

themanowesme

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
I am not debating if it should be a win or not, what I am debating is someone who comes in here using a handle that smells of tout all over. The odds are that we wont be seeing to much of this handle in the future if these "INSIDE PICKS" continue to lose.

Well the more I think about it, can you tell me why this game should have went under 9 out of 10 times. I am not being a smarta@@, I just want to know how you come to that assumption. I saw the number at 132.5 about 10 minutes to tipoff so the public was hammering the under in this one. Remember if it looks to good to be true then it is to good to be true. The books cleaned up on the over/under in this one.
 
SureGuy

SureGuy

pro gamblererer
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
2,790
Reaction score
0
themanowesme said:
I am not debating if it should be a win or not, what I am debating is someone who comes in here using a handle that smells of tout all over. The odds are that we wont be seeing to much of this handle in the future if these "INSIDE PICKS" continue to lose.

Well the more I think about it, can you tell me why this game should have went under 9 out of 10 times. I am not being a smarta@@, I just want to know how you come to that assumption. I saw the number at 132.5 about 10 minutes to tipoff so the public was hammering the under in this one. Remember if it looks to good to be true then it is to good to be true. The books cleaned up on the over/under in this one.
Public was NOT hammering the Under. The " money " was on the over. TRUST ME. and the line kept dipping. That usually wins.

It doesn't really matter though, It was a loss. I do know you feel about touting off. Touts suck.
 

themanowesme

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
Sure Guy said:
Public was NOT hammering the Under. The " money " was on the over. TRUST ME. and the line kept dipping. That usually wins.

It doesn't really matter though, It was a loss. I do know you feel about touting off. Touts suck.
Where do you get your info on who the public is playing?? I see alot of people posting the percentage of what side the public is on but I dont know where to look for that info at.

Any help would be appreciated!!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,141,881
Messages
13,924,796
Members
104,823
Latest member
the_lizard
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com