Ind got hosed

[Ketch]

that field looked good

 

[bukis1]

Sure did. Not sure what ref saw but i never do

 

[boss415]

It was good for sure but disgusting d is what cost them particularly the qb draw for 80 yards in the first half

 

[brewerfan003]

Very frustrating

is is what it is

on to next play

 

[torpedomo]

Karma from the non call intentional grounding the play before that went uncalled

 

[cutacrossshorty]

Was probably good, but the kick had a fade on it. If it had a draw it would've been inside the post by 5 feet or more.

Lost around 5K on a similar kick in the 1985/86 Orange Bowl.

 

[DC.]

fg was off what are you guys smoking?

 

[brewerfan003]

Analysts at half of Tulsa va tech game said fg looked like inside uprights

 

[powerz]

Always contraversy in that bowl game, Refs must be from Jersey...had resos at Babbo didn't want to be late

Fell bad for that Kicker missed the game winner thanks to the son of Ray Finkle & then Gets hosed by the refs.

 

[quantumleap]

fg was off what are you guys smoking?

Looked to me like it went right over the upright and I had a bet on Indy.

 

[JRWins]

LOL. That kick was clearly not good. Sounds like just seem people that lost money on the game. Eye Doctor's should be open Monday for you guys.

 

[Daigo23]

Unless you are standing under the uprights... you will never know. I think it looked good AFTER it went past the uprights

 

[lumpy]

Looked to me like it went right over the upright and I had a bet on Indy.

That's how it looked to me too and I think the rule is that the entire ball has to pass INSIDE the upright. If part of the ball is over the top of the upright, the kick is not good. Unfortunately for Indiana bettors, there is nothing up there to bank the ball through like when a lower kick hits the inside of the upright and goes through.

 

[locker8]

As a duke player I thought it was karma because the play before should have been called grounding but I don't understand these fields with such low goal post make no sense

 

[MidNiteGambler]

If the ball would have been lower it PROBABLY "donks" the up right pole - might have glanced off and gone through or bounced off and not thru - thats why if the ball is over the top of the up right its not reviewable , even though it looked a bit inside.

 

[Gravy]

What couldn't that played be reviewed as it looked like it went right over the upright

 

[Daigo23]

What couldn't that played be reviewed as it looked like it went right over the upright

I was wondering if they was going to review it or not.

 

[1osubucks]

that field looked good

I agree but glad it was called no good

 

[torpedomo]

Good start for big ten ...0-1 and counting

 

[tnvolfan]

I had Ind -2 & Duke +3.5 Had a dollar more on Duke +3.5. Did u see the replay they showed
behind the goal post? FG was good