In a phone poll 93% supported the kidnappings.

[eek.]

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=629 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD colSpan=3>Arabs ambivalent over hostage crisis




</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top width=416><!-- S BO --><!-- S IBYL --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=416 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=bottom>By Sebastian Usher

BBC World Media correspondent

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

<!-- E IBYL -->

<!-- S IIMA --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=203 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- E IIMA -->

The Arab media has presented the latest hostage crisis in Iraq as just another element in the bloody and chaotic pattern of violence in the country.

The latest developments have been reported and often broken on Arab television channels, but they have soon been superseded by bloodshed elsewhere in Iraq or in the Palestinian territories and Israel.

There has been little sign of the outrage that greeted the kidnapping of two French hostages last month and none of the soul-searching prompted by the Beslan siege.

The issue of foreign hostages in Iraq was examined this week on the most heated discussion programme on the Middle East's most-watched television station, al-Jazeera.

Television debate

In the programme The Opposite Direction a fiercely anti-American political analyst, Talat Rumayh, faced off against an Iraqi politician, Karim Badr.

<!-- S IIMA --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=203 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>

In the Arab media the plight of Iraqis and Palestinians overshadows that of the hostages



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- E IIMA -->Mr Rumayh claimed that the kidnappers were Iraqi resistance fighters and compared the number of their victims to the thousands of Iraqis, who had been killed:

"Two thousand people have been killed since the beginning of the attack on Falluja, which was dismissed in one report, one line or just a couple of words... while we keep hearing about the hostages. It's the hostages and the terrorists, always the terrorists," he said.

Karim Badr responded by saying all Iraq was disgraced by the beheadings.

"We have to prove our humanity. I am addressing my brethren in Iraq: These are masked creatures that resemble humans, who I am certain are uglier than their deeds," he said.

"Is the killing of people and exploding cars in the streets an act of resistance? Is the kidnapping and murder of people in this manner an act of resistance? I am certain they do not represent the Iraqi conscience in any way at all."

Viewers 'unmoved'

Viewers were unmoved. In a phone poll 93% supported the kidnappings.

<!-- S IBOX --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=208 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=5>

</TD><TD class=sibtbg>

The kidnappers' demands are limited to Iraq, whose political and security problems remain the focus of Arab attention rather than the fate of Western hostages

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- E IBOX -->A little later - after the beheading of the second American hostage - an Iraqi religious leader told al-Jazeera that the foreign hostages were capturing the world's attention at the expense of the Iraqi people's suffering.

In the Arab media, naturally enough, this order is reversed - with the plight of Iraqis and Palestinians overshadowing that of the hostages.

But this is not to say that the Arab satellite channels have ignored the human impact of the story - the hostages' relatives appeared live on al-Jazeera, hoping to convey their pleas for mercy directly to the kidnappers.

The Arab press has also, in the past, condemned Abu Musab al-Zarqawi as a thug who perverts Islam.

But there has not been the same outcry as when two French journalists were taken hostage and their kidnappers demanded that France rescind its ban on Islamic headscarves in schools.

Then, many Arab commentators warned that the kidnappers' actions could irrevocably tarnish the image of Islam and the Arab world. This time, the kidnappers' demands are limited to Iraq, whose political and security problems remain the focus of Arab attention rather than the fate of Western hostages. <!-- E BO -->



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3684324.stm
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

 

[American]

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=629 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD colSpan=3>Arabs ambivalent over hostage crisis






</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top width=416><!-- S IIMA -->
Viewers 'unmoved'

Viewers were unmoved. In a phone poll 93% supported the kidnappings.




</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Q:How could that be? Ans: That's because it's a *CENSOR**CENSOR**CENSOR**CENSOR* culture.

 

[Benassflick]

let me see you violently take over and occupy their country. You term it as a mishap of war every time you kill their innocent civilians yet your government calls all the retaliation attacks against American soldiers terrorist acts. Bush is on fukked up mother fukkker and most of you guys are uneducated enough on world affairs to ride right along with him.

 

[primetime21+]

let me see you violently take over and occupy their country. You term it as a mishap of war every time you kill their innocent civilians yet your government calls all the retaliation attacks against American soldiers terrorist acts. Bush is on fukked up mother fukkker and most of you guys are uneducated enough on world affairs to ride right along with him.

uneducated enough to understand that they are kidnapping soldiers, they are kidnapping innocent workers. If a poll came out and said that 93 percent of americans are ambivalent to the deaths of innocent iraqis you would be shocked. But since we expect no civility from arabs it is ok that they could care less about innocent americans and british being beheaded.

 

[bblight]

In the Peoples Republic of Massachusetts, one has to maintain a very public degree of political correctness; the consequences of not doing so can be economically and socially painful.

In Iraq, I'm sure that the PC thing to do is support the insurgents point of view - to do otherwise is probably quite suicidal! After all, you never know who's on the other end of the phone.

 

[primetime21+]

In the Peoples Republic of Massachusetts, one has to maintain a very public degree of political correctness; the consequences of not doing so can be economically and socially painful.

In Iraq, I'm sure that the PC thing to do is support the insurgents point of view - to do otherwise is probably quite suicidal! After all, you never know who's on the other end of the phone.

the article is unclear, but i believe the poll was of arab's and not just iraqi's. are we to presume that ALL arabs are unable to express their own true belief's for fear of reprisal?

 

[bblight]

primetime - My mistake - but the same still goes for the remainder of the Arab countries where the Wasabi point of view appears to be prevalent among the elite while the mainstream Arab working stiff has to be very careful about what he says and who he says it to.

The young people might be susceptable to the Wasabi rhetoric, but the older men with a family feed know where their priorities are.