Imagine if policemen thought and acted like liberals do?

Search

Militant Birther
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
11,836
Tokens
Imagine if policemen thought and acted like pansy "anti-war" liberals do?

Imagine if policemen spent hours questioning their moral judgment every time they witnessed a rape, a murder, theft, or even a graffiti thug "expressing himself" -- and just sat there and did nothing?

"Who am *I* to pick fights and go around stirring up trouble?" they would ask themselves. "Gosh, what if I kill someone? Then I'm just as bad as the evil doer who committed the crime!" :ohno:

Society would explode into chaos.

But that's feeling-centric liberalism for ya. No intellectual depth, no common sense, no moral clarity...just a heavy dose of prepubescent narcissism and moral relativism.

Now imagine what would happen on a global scale "the good" became oblivious to evil? Imagine what would happen if the United States adopted Barack Obama or Ron Paul's isolationist policies?

The world would soon explode into chaos. In fact throughout human history, that's EXACTLY what happened.

You see, the United States is a unique society. The United States is a prosperous and FREE society because we are blessed society.

Our government was founded on the concept of being governed by the people, for the people -- meaning, the good has the monopoly on force. (When I say "the good" I mean our system was founded on a dilution of power and ruled by the collective majority.) Therefore, "the good" keeps the pockets of evil at bay and marginalized. And since most people are inherently good, the troublemakers don't disrupt our free and prosperous way of life. (Unlike modern "progressives" them founders were brilliant, I'll tell ya!)

Do these do-gooder liberals understand any of this? Of course not, because liberals masturbate to John Lennon tunes when formulating their political beliefs -- they don't THINK.

Liberals aren't evil, they're just very VERY DUMB because liberals devote all their time and energy trying to convince you that people like me are "war mongers."

If you oppose evil, be prepared to have every pejorative in the limited liberal lexicon thrown your way.

Liberals rant against American foreign policy oblivious to the fact there are countries on this planet who still castrate women and imprison their citizens for simply expressing different political or religious views.

And yet in many of these countries liberals frame as "moral equal" in the abstract, there is no rule of law -- there is only law of the jungle.

"The good" does not have a monopoly on force in countries like Iran, China, Russia, Syria, Saudi Arabia, North Korea and so on.

So it should hardly be a shocker that a) tyrants and terrorists periodically stir up trouble AND b) that the good (The United States, Israel, Great Britain and whoever else wants to join us) must confront and stare them down whenever and wherever evil rears it's ugly head.

If you served in the United States military, having patrolled the air, the seas and various lands, I don't have to explain this to you. You understand the role of the United States military first hand. Having served your country honorably and been willing to pay the ultimate sacrifice, you understand why the US Navy, US Airforce, US Marines, US Army, CIA, special-ops do what they do.

On the other hand, if you're a Noam Chomsky bleeding-heart surrender monkey, hardly ever leave your sheltered existence and believe America is "imperialist" -- that the REAL source of evil in the world is the George W Bush -- then you must also believe it is immoral for police officers to do what they do in our society.

After all, violence is violence. One man's "freedom fighter" is another man's Jihadist.

Good news, libs! Seeing that America is a FREE country and that other fellow Americans have paid the ultimate price so you can keep spewing your anti-American Barack Obama "world citizen" garbage, Amazon.com has some reading material for you!

Hugo%20Chavez%20and%20Chomsky.jpg


Memo to all John Lennon liberals:

America is GREAT -- the "world" sucks!

"The good" must police the world, or evil will eventually win.
 

Militant Birther
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
11,836
Tokens
And now ladies and gents, before the appearance of the Chosen One, please rise for the singing of Barack Obama's anthem:

John Lennon's Imagine

Imagine there's no Heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today

Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace

You may say that I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one

Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world

You may say that I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one

FE_DA_080807whispers.jpg
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
The only thing I can tell from your post is that you are not a conservative.
 

RX resident ChicAustrian
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
3,956
Tokens
What do you think we should be doing about the Russia/Georgia conflict?
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Holy Cow....Mark's bipolar swing is strong to the Manic side this afternoon. Here come the 1000+ word essays which will be ready by a half dozen people.

What a sad waste of energy and passion. Too bad Mark doesn't have the sack to cull his passionate rants down into 5-600 word essays that might possibly be marketable to outlets which are read by thousands or tens of thousands of people such as most any mainstream newspaper.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
Holy Cow....Mark's bipolar swing is strong to the Manic side this afternoon. Here come the 1000+ word essays which will be ready by a half dozen people.

What a sad waste of energy and passion. Too bad Mark doesn't have the sack to cull his passionate rants down into 5-600 word essays that might possibly be marketable to outlets which are read by thousands or tens of thousands of people such as most any mainstream newspaper.

Barman, so your critique is now to the point of bitching that
he has 1,000 words instead of 600? Extremely weak and lame
if you ask me.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
ZIT, in order to be considered for publication in most mainstream newspapers, writers must be able to condense their thoughts down to a coherent 5-600 words for OPEDs or 250 words or less for LTEs.

OPEDs and LTEs in mainstream newspapers are read by at least 40% of their subscribers and that demographic is also the most highly rated for registred voters.

1000+ word Opinion items are routinely tossed by mainstream newspapers due to their restrictions on space per item.

Thus Mark is limited to internet rants posted in a Sports Handicapping Forum PoliticoPub where maybe a dozen or so people even read his 20-30 minute efforts. That's why I wince and wish he had the balls to condense his opinions down to a level where a real audience could read them and critique them (via feedback to the newspapers etc). Alas, Mark is a bit too fearful to put his heartfelt opinions in front of a real audience. Looks like our sports capping fraternity is his only audience.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
ZIT, in order to be considered for publication in most mainstream newspapers, writers must be able to condense their thoughts down to a coherent 5-600 words for OPEDs or 250 words or less for LTEs.

OPEDs and LTEs in mainstream newspapers are read by at least 40% of their subscribers and that demographic is also the most highly rated for registred voters.

1000+ word Opinion items are routinely tossed by mainstream newspapers due to their restrictions on space per item.

Thus Mark is limited to internet rants posted in a Sports Handicapping Forum PoliticoPub where maybe a dozen or so people even read his 20-30 minute efforts. That's why I wince and wish he had the balls to condense his opinions down to a level where a real audience could read them and critique them (via feedback to the newspapers etc). Alas, Mark is a bit too fearful to put his heartfelt opinions in front of a real audience. Looks like our sports capping fraternity is his only audience.

Seems like a pretty strange criticism to me. We all post here because we
feel like it - not because we aspire or desire to write for newspapers.

I have to admit though, that I do consider a lot of the time I spend
on here a waste of time - but then again, I do get a certain
amount of entertainment value out of it.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
ZIT, you hit it well there. "Most of us" post here as part of our leisure time between handicapping and wagering on sporting events.

Mark (joeC) clearly posts with a stronger agenda in mind based on the literal hours per week he invests in composing long, overblown essays on this or that political topic.

In the past 11 years working with people across the continent who are sincerely working to create positive social change, I've learned how hard it is to find people who will direct their beliefs into a venue that can truly effect voter change and policymaker changes of attitude. So when I see someone burning a couple dozen hours a week in a venue that reaches such a teeny tiny audience, I wince and wish that person had more belief in themselves and would have more ambition to reach a true audience where change could be effected. Clearly, Mark does not, but that's okay. Here at the RxPoliticoPub we welcome all comers, regardless of their level of ambition.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
ZIT, you hit it well there. "Most of us" post here as part of our leisure time between handicapping and wagering on sporting events.

Mark (joeC) clearly posts with a stronger agenda in mind based on the literal hours per week he invests in composing long, overblown essays on this or that political topic.

In the past 11 years working with people across the continent who are sincerely working to create positive social change, I've learned how hard it is to find people who will direct their beliefs into a venue that can truly effect voter change and policymaker changes of attitude. So when I see someone burning a couple dozen hours a week in a venue that reaches such a teeny tiny audience, I wince and wish that person had more belief in themselves and would have more ambition to reach a true audience where change could be effected. Clearly, Mark does not, but that's okay. Here at the RxPoliticoPub we welcome all comers, regardless of their level of ambition.

Probably both of us spend/waste more time on here than we should...
Have you ever asked Joe why he doesn't find a more productive
venue for his posts? That is a good question, given the amount of
time he spends on them. I see where you are coming from.
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,373
Tokens
Imagine if police were opposite of what Joe pens here. What if they said "The hell with our actions, we're just doing someone else's bidding. Who cares if innocent people are hurt? It's better to hurt a few thousand innocent people if we get a few bad guys!"

Wait! That' exactly what we have now with the majority of this ilk.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Probably both of us spend/waste more time on here than we should...
Have you ever asked Joe why he doesn't find a more productive
venue for his posts? That is a good question, given the amount of
time he spends on them. I see where you are coming from.

ZIT, been there, done that. I challenged Mark several years ago when I first saw his two to three hours a day in PoliticoPub as to why he didn't take his beliefs to a bigger venue and he's never had an answer.

The only logical conclusion is that he doesn't believe his own rap with sufficient ardor to try and effect real change in the community. In short, he's all talk, no walk.

Which takes me back to my observation that the world needs more walk and less talk when it comes to making positive change in our communities.
Perhaps one day, Mark will get enough gumption to promote his seemingly passionate beliefs to a venue of more than a couple dozen fairly apathetic (in this context at least) sports handicapping schmoes like us.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,917
Messages
13,575,202
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com