If this trend continues, Bushie COULD BE impeached

[cincy_]

We all know that our "leaders" follow polls before making any decision, and if this poll has any credibility, they might just try it.

http://americanresearchgroup.com/

<table align="center" bgcolor="silver" border="0" cellspacing="0" width="90%"><tbody class="tbody1"><tr><td colspan="4" align="left">Question:</td> </tr><tr> <td colspan="4" align="left">Do you favor or oppose the US House of Representatives beginning impeachment proceedings against President George W. Bush?</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="4" align="right" bgcolor="maroon" height="2">
</td> </tr> <tr> <td>7/5/07</td> <td align="center">Favor</td> <td align="center">Oppose</td> <td align="center">Undecided</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="4" bgcolor="maroon" height="1">
</td> </tr> <tr> <td>All Adults</td> <td align="center">45%</td> <td align="center">46%</td> <td align="center">9%</td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#efefef">Voters</td> <td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">46%</td> <td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">44%</td> <td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">10%</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="4" align="right" bgcolor="maroon" height="2">
</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left">Democrats (38%)</td> <td align="center">69%</td> <td align="center">22%</td> <td align="center">9%</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left" bgcolor="#efefef">Republicans (29%)</td> <td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">13%</td> <td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">86%</td> <td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">1%</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left">Independents (33%)</td> <td align="center">50%</td> <td align="center">30%</td> <td align="center">20%</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="4" align="left" bgcolor="maroon" height="2">
</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="1" align="left">3/15/06</td> <td colspan="1" align="center">42%</td> <td colspan="1" align="center">49%</td> <td colspan="1" align="center">9%</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="4" align="left" bgcolor="maroon" height="1">
</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="4" align="left">Based on 1,100 completed telephone interviews among a random sample of adults nationwide July 3-5, 2007. The theoretical margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points, 95% of the time. Of the total sample, 933 interviews were completed among registered voters.</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

<table align="center" bgcolor="silver" border="0" cellspacing="0" width="90%"><tbody class="tbody1"><tr> <td colspan="4" align="left">Question:</td> </tr><tr> <td colspan="4" align="left">Do you favor or oppose the US House of Representatives beginning impeachment proceedings against Vice President Dick Cheney?</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="4" align="right" bgcolor="maroon" height="2">
</td> </tr> <tr> <td>7/5/07</td> <td align="center">Favor</td> <td align="center">Oppose</td> <td align="center">Undecided</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="4" bgcolor="maroon" height="1">
</td> </tr> <tr> <td>All Adults</td> <td align="center">54%</td> <td align="center">40%</td> <td align="center">6%</td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#efefef">Voters</td> <td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">50%</td> <td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">44%</td> <td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">6%</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="4" align="right" bgcolor="maroon" height="2">
</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left">Democrats (38%)</td> <td align="center">76%</td> <td align="center">24%</td> <td align="center">-</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left" bgcolor="#efefef">Republicans (29%)</td> <td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">17%</td> <td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">83%</td> <td align="center" bgcolor="#efefef">-</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left">Independents (33%)</td> <td align="center">51%</td> <td align="center">29%</td> <td align="center">20%</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="4" align="left" bgcolor="maroon" height="2">
</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="4" align="left">Based on 1,100 completed telephone interviews among a random sample of adults nationwide July 3-5, 2007. The theoretical margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points, 95% of the time. Of the total sample, 933 interviews were completed among registered voters.</td></tr></tbody></table>

 

[Willie99]

right, impeached about what?

prewar intelligence? you really think anybody wants their lies about the President lying to be exposed? Not even a fucking sniff

I like how all of a sudden, some 14 words in a lengthy address becomes "the reason we went to war", and even those words are true today.

"British Intelligence" believes to this day Iraq tried to by Yellowcake from Niger. Joe Wilson literally having "cocktails with a friend" does not disprove anything. Joe is a fool, and only fools & haters could accept his story as factual. It's sooooo weak it's actually laughable. Then again, we have people who think W planned 9/11, blew up the levies, let black people die on purpose, stole Florida, stole Ohio and is managing to keep 1,216,332 people involved in his World Wide Web of Deception quite.

PS: Our own intelligence believes it's now "more likely" Iraq tried to buy Yellowcake from Niger after reading Wilson's report. You see, the Iraqi officials identified by Joe whom Joe said went there to buy coffee would never go there to buy coffee. ITHO, which certainly carries a lot more weight then "cocktails with a friend".

Guarantee to GOP in 08, please try to impeach W.

 

[FatTony]

No Willie.


They're going to impeach him for lying about a blow job.

 

[Willie99]

Lets have these fools take the stand in 2008 and the Dems esplain dem der positions.

I'm telling you, I like the idea. Bring on impeachment. :missingte

http://www.husseinandterror.com/

 

[RobFunk]

Wouldnt make sense to waste money on a trial. Hes only got 17 months

Anyone know when the primarys are?!

 

[Willie99]

No Willie.


They're going to impeach him for lying about a blow job.

He committed perjury while defending himself in a lawsuit brought on by a third party. He lied in court "under oath", not to protect his wife (she knew and she's an enabler, not a good characteristic for a President), but to keep himself from losing a lawsuit & possibly his job.

He was lying about Monica, while his henchmen were working to destroy this girl. Hillary joined in the lies and started lying about a "vast right wing conspiracy". Then they choked on a blue dress, settled the lawsuit out of court and started walking around carrying fucking bibles.

These people are your heros. :think2:


PS: with respect to the blow job, every 50+ year old person in America would lose his or her job if they had a relationship with a twenty year old intern. Everyone except Democratic politicians, that is.

:lolBIG:

 

[JudgeWapner]

To my knowledge, idiocy is not an impeachable offense.

 

[JudgeWapner]

"PS: with respect to the blow job, every 50+ year old person in America would lose his or her job if they had a relationship with a twenty year old intern." Except bookmakers.

 

[Willie99]

"PS: with respect to the blow job, every 50+ year old person in America would lose his or her job if they had a relationship with a twenty year old intern." Except bookmakers.

Self employed or corporate or both?

In the States or CR or both?

:thumbsup:

 

[JudgeWapner]

Willie, it's a job requirement in every part of the world.

 

[FatTony]

right, impeached about what?

prewar intelligence? you really think anybody wants their lies about the President lying to be exposed? Not even a fucking sniff

I like how all of a sudden, some 14 words in a lengthy address becomes "the reason we went to war", and even those words are true today.

"British Intelligence" believes to this day Iraq tried to by Yellowcake from Niger. Joe Wilson literally having "cocktails with a friend" does not disprove anything. Joe is a fool, and only fools & haters could accept his story as factual. It's sooooo weak it's actually laughable. Then again, we have people who think W planned 9/11, blew up the levies, let black people die on purpose, stole Florida, stole Ohio and is managing to keep 1,216,332 people involved in his World Wide Web of Deception quite.

PS: Our own intelligence believes it's now "more likely" Iraq tried to buy Yellowcake from Niger after reading Wilson's report. You see, the Iraqi officials identified by Joe whom Joe said went there to buy coffee would never go there to buy coffee. ITHO, which certainly carries a lot more weight then "cocktails with a friend".

Guarantee to GOP in 08, please try to impeach W.

You probably could have gotten away with this lawyer type/smoke screen defense if it wasn't for things like this.......


<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td>
</td></tr> <tr><td>

</td></tr> </tbody></table><script> //if ((typeof(window['toSeenX']) == 'undefined') || (toSeenX > toShowX)) { document.write('

'); //} </script>

<noscript>

</noscript><script> function cbsCheckSize(){ var adsize = document.getElementById('midad').offsetHeight; if(adsize > 35){document.getElementById('adinsert').innerHTML = '
';} } </script>
Bush Sought ‘Way’ To Invade Iraq?

O'Neill Tells '60 Minutes' Iraq Was 'Topic A' 8 Months Before 9-11


<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="628"><tbody><tr><td class="body" valign="top" width="175">
</td><td width="8">
</td><td bgcolor="#999999" width="1">
</td><td width="8">
</td><td class="body" valign="top" width="436">Jan. 11, 2004<hr><table align="left" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="250"><tbody><tr><td class="bodysmall" width="244"><script> var storeInfo = new Array (3); var cbsx = 1; storeInfo[1] = '

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O\'Neill is the main source for an upcoming book about the Bush White House, "The Price of Loyalty." *(CBS)

'; storeInfo[2] = '

O\'Neill was fired by the White House a year ago for his disagreement on the president\'s policy on tax cuts. *(CBS)

'; storeInfo[3] = '

Former Wall Street Journal reporter Ron Suskind says he interviewed hundreds of people for the book – including several cabinet members. *(CBS)

'; function movePrev(){ cbsx-=1; if (cbsx == 0){ cbsx = 3; document.getElementById("pictures").innerHTML = storeInfo[cbsx]; document.getElementById("numbers").innerHTML = listNumbers(); } else {document.getElementById("pictures").innerHTML = storeInfo[cbsx]; document.getElementById("numbers").innerHTML = listNumbers(); } } //end of movePrev function moveNext(){ cbsx+=1; if (cbsx == 3 + 1){ cbsx = 1; document.getElementById("pictures").innerHTML = storeInfo[cbsx]; document.getElementById("numbers").innerHTML = listNumbers(); } else {document.getElementById("pictures").innerHTML = storeInfo[cbsx]; document.getElementById("numbers").innerHTML = listNumbers(); } } //end of moveNext function listNumbers(){ var numberImg = ''; for(i=1;i<4;i++){ if(i == cbsx){ numberImg += '

';} else{ numberImg += '

';} } return numberImg; } //end of function function getPic(){ document.getElementById("pictures").innerHTML = storeInfo[1]; } </script>

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill is the main source for an upcoming book about the Bush White House, "The Price of Loyalty." (CBS)

Quote

"From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go."[SIZE=-2] Paul O'Neill[/SIZE]
<hr></td><td width="6">
</td></tr></tbody></table>(CBS) <!-- sphereit start -->A year ago, Paul O'Neill was fired from his job as George Bush's Treasury Secretary for disagreeing too many times with the president's policy on tax cuts.

Now, O'Neill - who is known for speaking his mind - talks for the first time about his two years inside the Bush administration. His story is the centerpiece of a new book being published this week about the way the Bush White House is run.

Entitled "The Price of Loyalty," the book by a former Wall Street Journal reporter draws on interviews with high-level officials who gave the author their personal accounts of meetings with the president, their notes and documents. [Simon and Schuster, the book's publisher, and CBSNews.com, are both units of Viacom.]

But the main source of the book was Paul O'Neill. Correspondent Lesley Stahl reports. <hr width="50%">Paul O'Neill says he is going public because he thinks the Bush Administration has been too secretive about how decisions have been made.

Will this be seen as a “kiss-and-tell" book?

“I've come to believe that people will say damn near anything, so I'm sure somebody will say all of that and more,” says O’Neill, who was George Bush's top economic policy official.

In the book, O’Neill says that the president did not make decisions in a methodical way: there was no free-flow of ideas or open debate.

At cabinet meetings, he says the president was "like a blind man in a roomful of deaf people. There is no discernible connection," forcing top officials to act "on little more than hunches about what the president might think."

This is what O'Neill says happened at his first hour-long, one-on-one meeting with Mr. Bush: “I went in with a long list of things to talk about, and I thought to engage on and as the book says, I was surprised that it turned out me talking, and the president just listening … As I recall, it was mostly a monologue.”

He also says that President Bush was disengaged, at least on domestic issues, and that disturbed him. And he says that wasn't his experience when he worked as a top official under Presidents Nixon and Ford, or the way he ran things when he was chairman of Alcoa.
</td></tr></tbody></table>
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/main592330.shtml


He was ready to go in on day 1 of office, before anyone handed him an ounce of evidence.

 

[JudgeWapner]

I will always believe that Iraq occured because JR wanted to make a place in history for himself.

 

[Willie99]

You probably could have gotten away with this lawyer type/smoke screen defense if it wasn't for things like this.......


<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td>
</td></tr> <tr><td>

</td></tr> </tbody></table><script> //if ((typeof(window['toSeenX']) == 'undefined') || (toSeenX > toShowX)) { document.write('

'); //} </script>

<noscript>

</noscript><script> function cbsCheckSize(){ var adsize = document.getElementById('midad').offsetHeight; if(adsize > 35){document.getElementById('adinsert').innerHTML = '
';} } </script>
Bush Sought ‘Way’ To Invade Iraq?

O'Neill Tells '60 Minutes' Iraq Was 'Topic A' 8 Months Before 9-11


<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="628"><tbody><tr><td class="body" valign="top" width="175">
</td><td width="8">
</td><td bgcolor="#999999" width="1">
</td><td width="8">
</td><td class="body" valign="top" width="436">Jan. 11, 2004<hr><table align="left" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="250"><tbody><tr><td class="bodysmall" width="244"><script> var storeInfo = new Array (3); var cbsx = 1; storeInfo[1] = '

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O\'Neill is the main source for an upcoming book about the Bush White House, "The Price of Loyalty." *(CBS)

'; storeInfo[2] = '

O\'Neill was fired by the White House a year ago for his disagreement on the president\'s policy on tax cuts. *(CBS)

'; storeInfo[3] = '

Former Wall Street Journal reporter Ron Suskind says he interviewed hundreds of people for the book – including several cabinet members. *(CBS)

'; function movePrev(){ cbsx-=1; if (cbsx == 0){ cbsx = 3; document.getElementById("pictures").innerHTML = storeInfo[cbsx]; document.getElementById("numbers").innerHTML = listNumbers(); } else {document.getElementById("pictures").innerHTML = storeInfo[cbsx]; document.getElementById("numbers").innerHTML = listNumbers(); } } //end of movePrev function moveNext(){ cbsx+=1; if (cbsx == 3 + 1){ cbsx = 1; document.getElementById("pictures").innerHTML = storeInfo[cbsx]; document.getElementById("numbers").innerHTML = listNumbers(); } else {document.getElementById("pictures").innerHTML = storeInfo[cbsx]; document.getElementById("numbers").innerHTML = listNumbers(); } } //end of moveNext function listNumbers(){ var numberImg = ''; for(i=1;i<4;i++){ if(i == cbsx){ numberImg += '

';} else{ numberImg += '

';} } return numberImg; } //end of function function getPic(){ document.getElementById("pictures").innerHTML = storeInfo[1]; } </script>

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill is the main source for an upcoming book about the Bush White House, "The Price of Loyalty." (CBS)

Quote

"From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go."[SIZE=-2] Paul O'Neill[/SIZE]
<hr></td><td width="6">
</td></tr></tbody></table>(CBS) <!-- sphereit start -->A year ago, Paul O'Neill was fired from his job as George Bush's Treasury Secretary for disagreeing too many times with the president's policy on tax cuts.

Now, O'Neill - who is known for speaking his mind - talks for the first time about his two years inside the Bush administration. His story is the centerpiece of a new book being published this week about the way the Bush White House is run.

Entitled "The Price of Loyalty," the book by a former Wall Street Journal reporter draws on interviews with high-level officials who gave the author their personal accounts of meetings with the president, their notes and documents. [Simon and Schuster, the book's publisher, and CBSNews.com, are both units of Viacom.]

But the main source of the book was Paul O'Neill. Correspondent Lesley Stahl reports. <hr width="50%">Paul O'Neill says he is going public because he thinks the Bush Administration has been too secretive about how decisions have been made.

Will this be seen as a “kiss-and-tell" book?

“I've come to believe that people will say damn near anything, so I'm sure somebody will say all of that and more,” says O’Neill, who was George Bush's top economic policy official.

In the book, O’Neill says that the president did not make decisions in a methodical way: there was no free-flow of ideas or open debate.

At cabinet meetings, he says the president was "like a blind man in a roomful of deaf people. There is no discernible connection," forcing top officials to act "on little more than hunches about what the president might think."

This is what O'Neill says happened at his first hour-long, one-on-one meeting with Mr. Bush: “I went in with a long list of things to talk about, and I thought to engage on and as the book says, I was surprised that it turned out me talking, and the president just listening … As I recall, it was mostly a monologue.”

He also says that President Bush was disengaged, at least on domestic issues, and that disturbed him. And he says that wasn't his experience when he worked as a top official under Presidents Nixon and Ford, or the way he ran things when he was chairman of Alcoa.
</td></tr></tbody></table>
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/main592330.shtml


He was ready to go in on day 1 of office, before anyone handed him an ounce of evidence.

Do you know how deceptive this, intentionally deceptive which makes O'Neil another liar. You see, he knows the truth. Just decided to deceive instead.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/830817/posts

Bill Clinton implemented to American Policy to remove Saddam and signed the Iraqi Liberation Act in 1998.

At the first meeting that liar looney O'Neil refers to, the first meeting happened to be about national security, Bush simply retained Bubba's policy. There was no reason to overturn Bubba's policy. :banger:

A little truth, logic & thinking goes a long way. :thumbsup:

 

[Willie99]

Willie, it's a job requirement in every part of the world.

I'm in the wrong profession. Come to think of it, so is Bubba :thumbsup:

 

[cincy_]

I will always believe that Iraq occured because JR wanted to make a place in history for himself.

YUP ... and the people who pushed his buttons did it for a variety of reasons.

Go back and listen to Dumbsfeld's speech the day he was canned ... Dumbsfeld kept bringing up "the President's legacy" ... that is how the Neocons got our Dumbass President to go for the ride and sign the checks.

 

[tiznow]

They are all criminals in some way shape or form on the left and the right. The powers that be want to polarize people to either the far right or far left to distract from this fact.

 

[VaultedTreehouse]

How silly. He is out in a year and half anyway. He is a lame duck. That's his punishment.

 

[cincy_]

They are all criminals in some way shape or form on the left and the right. The powers that be want to polarize people to either the far right or far left to distract from this fact.

YUP.

That is how politics is run ... gather a group of bitches who will support you no matter what ... polarize them into a frenzy ... then you have the license to do ANYTHING ... the bitches don't have the self-respect to question you and will support you forever ... I have seen it with Clinton and I see it with Bushie.

 

[BASEHEAD]

How silly. He is out in a year and half anyway. He is a lame duck. That's his punishment.

I keep hearing this.Im not sure you folks have thought it out tho.

What have the almighty house and congress actually implimented that Bush didnt support?

Hey at least the poll admits its liberal heavy.

 

[FatTony]

Do you know how deceptive this, intentionally deceptive which makes O'Neil another liar. You see, he knows the truth. Just decided to deceive instead.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/830817/posts

Bill Clinton implemented to American Policy to remove Saddam and signed the Iraqi Liberation Act in 1998.

At the first meeting that liar looney O'Neil refers to, the first meeting happened to be about national security, Bush simply retained Bubba's policy. There was no reason to overturn Bubba's policy. :banger:

A little truth, logic & thinking goes a long way. :thumbsup:

Way to be condescending with a weak argument. :thumbsup:

Adviser on National Security Richard Clarke said the SAME THING O'Neil said about Bush having a "hard-on" for invading Iraq and he worked under both Clinton's and Bush's administrations.

Why would he publicly make a point of this if it was just a continuation of policy????????

I guess Clarke must be lying too. Probably one of those conspiracy things going on. Man, that Clarke and O'Neil are two sly devils.