If Harrison is tackled at the 1 by Fitzgerald

[BigDon]

WILL THEY CALL IT A TD ??? BECAUSE LARRY FITZGERALD WAS RUNNING OUT OF BOUNCE FOR AT LEAST 15 YARDS AND CAME FROM OUT OF BOUNCE TO MAKE THE TACKLE.. JUST CURIOUS AND THANKS IN ADVANCE FOR THE RULE.........:think2:

 

[Dr.T]

It would have been funny if Harrison had been cocky and decided to "bounce" the football as he ran down the sidelines............and didn't run out of "bounds".

 

[JETE]

There was a penalty on arizona during that play.

If he was down at the 1 then pitts burgh would get one

more play from the 1/2 yard line.

 

[JakeT.]

There was a penalty on arizona during that play.

If he was down at the 1 then pitts burgh would get one

more play from the 1/2 yard line.

Correct.

 

[EasyMoney]

there was also a blatent penalty on Woodley on that play for blocking in the back that wasn't called. But yes Pitt would've gotten one more play.

 

[CoolBreeze22]

there was also a blatent penalty on Woodley on that play for blocking in the back that wasn't called. But yes Pitt would've gotten one more play.

no shit, if Hightower isn't mugged from behind at the 20 he easily pushes Harrison out of bounce.

 

[Syklone]

No penalty on Fitz. That rule only applies on KO's and Punt returns.

 

[BigDon]

No penalty on Fitz. That rule only applies on KO's and Punt returns.

Thanks, thats the rule i was looking for...:toast: Not that that crybaby shit from the other guys.......

 

[I_Need_Money]

Thanks, thats the rule i was looking for...:toast: Not that that crybaby shit from the other guys.......

There was another penalty earlier in the runback on Arizona that was called. So either way on Fitz going out of bounds, it still would have been Pitt's ball on the 1/2 with no time on the clock and one play left.