IF AMERICA ONLY EXISTED

johnnie2times · Jul 30, 2003

Then there would be no imports and WE could live happy lives.No but we have to deal with the muslim world every day of hatred of the United States.

If these fools were not jeolous there would be peace.
But because these people will never eat STEAK or have half of what we have, they are a everyday threat to OUR society.Until they all go away we will always HAVE to look over the shoulder to see if the holloween party is going on.

AMERICA THE POWERHOUSE! Keep the pressure on and keep the blood flowing.As our tropps continue to kill innocent people,hopefully the media won't tell the public.What the public does not know will not hurt.MARCH ON!

Sand castles anybody?

Brazil4Worldcup2002 · Jul 30, 2003

even Rome fell as*hole

Oceans11 · Jul 31, 2003

Rome fell, and a thousand years of chaos and darkness followed....

[This message was edited by eek on July 31, 2003 at 03:56 AM.]

KMAN · Jul 31, 2003

Does anyone out there think that us Americans want to be involved in all of the problems of these third world countries. We try to help because we are asked to, and this is the payback we get. Talk about ungrateful P.O.S. I would much rather pull all of our troops out of all of these third world countries and let them all kill each other and continue to live in the 15th century, yet our government tries to protect people less fortunte then ourselves and this is our reward. WTF!

Thanks to America, actually thanks to Al Gore

jerkoffs from around the world can get on our websites and post anti-American. Thanks AL!

KMAN

Brazil4Worldcup2002 · Jul 31, 2003

thank u for sending troops to liberia

radiofreecostarica · Jul 31, 2003

Rome fell, and a thousand years of chaos and darkness followed....

Untrue. Monks in ireland perserved texts throughout the "dark ages" while intellectual life flourished in the middle east.
We wouldn't know that now, seeing that we just bombed them right back to pre-Roman times.

radiofreecostarica · Jul 31, 2003

Thanks to America, actually thanks to Al Gore jerkoffs from around the world can get on our websites and post anti-American. Thanks AL!

Kman, way to push the blame on someone else...Al Gore? Come on...

He has nothing to do with an unemployment rate of 6.4%, numerous little "vietnams" around the world. If anything, Al Gore is a sellout to the right, the man promised so many environmental reforms only to later bow to corporations. He should be your idol, not your scapegoat.

KMAN · Jul 31, 2003

RFC - FYI - Al Gore claims that he invented the internet.

KMAN

radiofreecostarica · Jul 31, 2003

Yes, and Dan Quayle cannot spell potato.

So what?

JackDee · Jul 31, 2003

and dubya has 1600+ dumbass quotes on dubyaspeak.com and counting...

KMAN · Aug 1, 2003

RFC - It was supposed to be a joke about Al Gore.

KMAN

radiofreecostarica · Aug 2, 2003

I was joking about Quayle....

forgot to put the "

"

Skyweasel · Aug 3, 2003

Well it's a toss between this one and the many Johnny/fatbob posts about "towelheads" for my favorite, but I think I'm going with the one where he gayly mused about why he should care if anyone bombs and maims innocent Iraqis. Hear hear! And I don't care if anyone bombs or maims Johnny, if I read about it in the morning paper that someone dropped a bomb on a house in Cleveland and Johnny and Mrs. Johnny and the little Johnnys all fried like toast that got stuck in a toaster on 'high', I'd just say, "Hmmph" and get to back to my Cheerios and the sports page. God bless America!

radiofreecostarica · Aug 3, 2003

hahaha....

"stuck in the toaster..."..

****ing funny.

johnnie2times · Aug 3, 2003

Skycap--everybody has a dream,but they aint happening to me.

A innocent Iraqie family has a better shot of becoming my next french frie or filaphel on the ground.

March on troops.I am getting tired of seeing one of my troops getting gunned down each day.

For every troop that dies the Army should double their killings of the enemy!And the enemy is Iraqies and Iranians.

More blood please.

Tellitlikeitis · Aug 3, 2003

More blood please????

The US has no right to be there in the first place. Bush wouldn't give the UN inspectors an additional 2 weeks. Now it has been months and Bush says he needs more time to find the weapons of mass destruction.

Most of the highjackers on 9/11 were from Saudi Arabia. What the hell is he doing attacking Iraq in the first place? Why not attack the Saudi's?

Terrorism isn't caused by jealousy. It is caused by foriegn policy, sticking our nose in other countries business, ignorance, arrogance and lastly RELIGION. Religion has caused far more damage than good.

As long as the US troops are standing around Iraq, in over 58 degree heat, they will be sitting targets for the locals. How much would you like a foriegn occupation force standing on your corner with M16's? They don't know the language or culture. At this point they have no business there. Maybe someone should knock this into the president's head.

I guess Bush is just so confused with all these evil doers. So lets just distract the US public and dig the economy deaper into a pit of dispare.

RalphJ · Aug 4, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Tell it like it is:
More blood please????

The US has no right to be there in the first place. Bush wouldn't give the UN inspectors an additional 2 weeks.

What the hell is he doing attacking Iraq in the first place?

Why not attack the Saudi's?

At this point they have no business there.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

No, we didn't give them 2 more weeks, you can thank the French for that. After Saddam ordered the removal of the U.N. inspectors for the 15th time, that's right, 15 times!! Since the end of the 1991 gulf war. U.S. and Britian went to the UN security council with yet one more resolution to make the Iraqui's comply with the original UN resolution in 30 days or "any and all means necessary to enforce the resolution would be used". The French vetoed this because it inferred the use of force in the case of non-compliance. The French said they would veto ANY resolution where the use of force was inferred. So you see, the French forced America's hand. We didn't want to give them only 15 days, we wanted to give them a full month. Saddam did not comply to the original resolution in 11 years! Kicked out UN inspectors a total of 15 times! You can only say, "this is your last chance" so many times. With someone with supposedly nothing to hide, sure was strange behaviour. Especially when he knew well and good that if the Americans came this time, destination was Baghdad, and objective was his removal from power.

If we find that any Saudi's had a direct hand in 911, that are still alive, the Saudi gov't will have to take action against them or else they will have a problem.

As far as Americans still being there. Believe me, the worst thing that could be done right now for the Iraqui's, with Saddam apparently still alive, would be to leave Iraq. Guarantee ya if we leave Iraq with Saddam still alive, he'll kill a lot more Iraqui's than the Americans did.

lander · Aug 4, 2003

Ralphie "the political expert of South America after an entire FOUR years",
Isreal has violated SEVERAL UN resolutions & has performed terrorist acts - do you fancy bombing them too?

"No, we didn't give them 2 more weeks, you can thank the French for that."
No, you can thank "selected" President Bush and yet another one of his "common man" lies .. ahem .. "lay the cards on the table"

RalphJ · Aug 4, 2003

Don't know if you would classify me as a South American political expert. But have several "friends" that are Brazilian politicians. All I've stated is what I have FIRST HAND experience in. I don't need to read a ****ing book, I'm here, I know the politicians, I'm experiencing it.

As far as Isreal is concerned, I'm not a big fan of our foreign policy concerning them. When they're wrong we need to tell them they're wrong and stop playing favorites because of financial implications.

"lay the cards on the table??" I guess you believe that we should've continued to give Saddam a 16th attempt at kicking out the UN inspectors huh? Don't just blame Bush, our military action had the approval of congress my friend. I guess you believe that we should allow the French to make decisions for us in the protection of our own country and people. Don't know if you're american or not, but if you're so damn unhappy and pissed off why don't you just get the **** out and quit crying?

lander · Aug 4, 2003

As far as Isreal is concerned, I'm not a big fan of our foreign policy concerning them. When they're wrong we need to tell them they're wrong and stop playing favorites because of financial implications.
That's fantastic, but you ducked my question. Isreal, like Iraq, has violated UN resolutions (except Isreal has violated many more) - do you think we should bomb them too? Policy is policy, no?

"lay the cards on the table??" I guess you believe that we should've continued to give Saddam a 16th attempt at kicking out the UN inspectors huh? Don't just blame Bush, our military action had the approval of congress my friend. I guess you believe that we should allow the French to make decisions for us in the protection of our own country and people.
The French didn't make the decision to weasel out of a vote - GWB & Co did (Bush really doesn't like this majority voting idea). Your scapecoat theory is as weak as your "they broke the resolution so force was needed" argument.

Don't know if you're american or not, but if you're so damn unhappy and pissed off why don't you just get the **** out and quit crying?
Yes I am American, and yes your statment is about the most ignortant idiotic statement on the boards. So instead of fighting to fix a broken system (ahem .. the revolution Spanky) we should just "get out"

Riiiiiight - maybe I'll go to Brazil and become a political expert