I need the help of posting body. Should I ban Beantownjim

[wilheim]

I have had a few complaints claiming Beantownjim's posting is racist and he should be banned. Personally I am trying not to ban anyone but will if you the posting body of The Rx.com vote that I should.

This poll is a simple yes ban him for the way he posts or no don't ban him because of the way he posts.

The poll will run two days - majority rules.

Thanks for you help, wil.

 

[royalfan]

No need to ban.

 

[VIEJODINOSAUR]

No....but if you do then others have to follow...you make racist remarks you are just plain stupid...if you act on them, then you must pay the consequences..

 

[whalewager]

No way in hell he should be banned.

 

[Gravy]

Yes boot his lame ass to the curb

 

[TTinCO]

I'd have to vote no.

A lot of people here occasionally blurt out something that I'd say was "racially insensitive" and it would set a double standard if we didn't ban them all(and no, we're not going to become the "racially pc" police).

Besides, I think BTJ's stuff is more tongue in cheek more than anything.

p.s. I believe that the votes in the poll are what is the official count(vs. the comments here)

 

[wilheim]

I am asking posters to help by voting.

The remarks are fine and welcomed but I would really appreciate it and consider it a personal favor if you would kindly vote one way or another rather than just comment. That way I can settle this matter.




Thanks, wil..

 

[whalewager]

Wil,

I know you said it should be a simple yes or no but I have to comment.

You have guys on here that say worse things. We are all grown men and can pick and choose who we ignore.

I say things that could be construed as racist so does that mean I should be banned? Hell, I just called the fedex guy a wetback bastard.

This forum needs characters and btj is one of them.

 

[ECS]

Can I vote to not ban him, but make him post in normal font, that shit drives me crazy trying to read it

 

[bellyputter]

I seldom read any of his posts. He isn't exactly a rocket scientist!

 

[VIEJODINOSAUR]

I'd have to vote no.

A lot of people here occasionally blurt out something that I'd say was "racially insensitive" and it would set a double standard if we didn't ban them all(and no, we're not going to become the "racially pc" police).

Besides, I think BTJ's stuff is more tongue in cheek more than anything.

p.s. I believe that the votes in the poll are what is the official count(vs. the comments here)

don't have your cell #, give me a ring.......

 

[FuriousDrew]

BTJ is a character....I'd like to see him stay around

 

[JohnnyB]

Besides, I think BTJ's stuff is more tongue in cheek more than anything.

Exactly. If anybody thinks that BTJ's act is anything more than a shtick they are a moron. No way he should be banned.

 

[billhill999]

No, but a warning stating diciplinary action will be taken if he doesn't clean his act up may be the way to go.

 

[oldirtyku]

BTJ is a POS...

 

[trytrytry]

no

 

[VakS]

NO but you should ban DOUG

 

[Dawoofdaddy]

No he should not be banned, but the majority of his drivel belongs in rubber room instead of the offshore forum.

 

[whalewager]

I think disloyalty should be a reason for banagement.

 

[bellyputter]

Wil, by the way, the people that need to be banned are the instigators and the tough guys. Just a bunch of punks.