I like New England

Search

New member
Joined
Mar 30, 2008
Messages
711
Tokens
I'm not a fan of either team so I thought making a pick would be easy. I was wrong. Both teams are well coached and have very talented players.
On paper, this should be a very good game with a close score throughout the 4 quarters. As a matter of fact, this game could possibly be the first to go into overtime in Super Bowl history. Yet inevitably, the intangibles will determine the winner. Fumbles, interceptions, penalties, imaginary penalties from the refs, players having unusually good games and players having terrible games. No way to predict these things. I happen to like the Pats (PK) for the reasons listed below but anything could happen and it usually does. GLTA and have a great Super Bowl.


The Pats players are hungrier and want this win more than Seattle. Tom Brady knows this is his last chance to win a Super Bowl.


The Packers provided a blueprint for defeating the Seahawks. I think Belicheck will use this and improve upon it. He'll find away to slow down Lynch and not let him take over the game. He'll also find a way to keep Wilson in the pocket as much as possible.


Packers 3-4 defense gave Wilson fits and the Pats 3-4 defense might do the same. If they can keep Wilson contained in the pocket, he will struggle and the Pats should win.


Much has been made of Seattle going 6-0 into the postseason but who did they play during that stretch? The QB-less Cardinals twice, the disappointing 49ers twice, the Rams and then an Eagles team clearly declining at season's end. Then they get a sub 500 team in the first round of the playoffs and then a miracle win versus Green Bay courtesy of a massive choke. Outside of Green Bay's game, which was awesome, they haven't played a quality team in month.


The Seahawks have a dominant defense but two of their key players (arguably their two best defensive players) have fairly significant injuries. Sherman has an elbow injury and Thomas has a separated shoulder. Those aren't insignificant injuries and take time to completely heal. Just because the Seahawks say they're both ready to play doesn't mean the players are at full strength. Belichick will test both of these players and expose any weakness he sees in the defense.


I think what a lot of people are overlooking is the fact that the Pats defense is better than people realize and the Seahawks offense is only good when Lynch is running well. The Pats run defense is good enough to take Lynch out of the game and put it all on Wilson's arm and if the game is on Wilson's arm, then the Pats should win.
 

come strong or dont come at all
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
5,455
Tokens
Wasn't Peyton in the same predicament last year....his window was open and closed..no difference with Brady..actually denvers team last year was better than this pats team.
 

seer
Joined
Jun 23, 2006
Messages
14,000
Tokens
gl thanks for providing links

The Pats players are hungrier and want this win more than Seattle. Tom Brady knows this is his last chance to win a Super Bowl.
i doubt this very much

The Packers provided a blueprint for defeating the Seahawks. I think Belicheck will use this and improve upon it. He'll find away to slow down Lynch and not let him take over the game. He'll also find a way to keep Wilson in the pocket as much as possible.
they wont stop both lynch and wilson on the ground. hell they cant even stop the jets rb allowing them to run all over pats in near upset victories 2x this year.
seattle beat themselves by turning the ball over. sure the pack did well but i expect that from the 2nd best team in the nfl.

If they can keep Wilson contained in the pocket, he will struggle and the Pats should win.
yes a big if - one that i doubt very much . they dont have clay matthews nor do they have peppers. so it is no rather than if

Much has been made of Seattle going 6-0 into the postseason but who did they play during that stretch? The QB-less Cardinals twice, the disappointing 49ers twice, the Rams and then an Eagles team clearly declining at season's end. Then they get a sub 500 team in the first round of the playoffs and then a miracle win versus Green Bay courtesy of a massive choke. Outside of Green Bay's game, which was awesome, they haven't played a quality team in month.

wat about pats playing and nearly losing 2x to jets. how about a dbl digit loss to miami a non contender? the nfc west has the best d in the whole nfl which still makes them the top division

The Seahawks have a dominant defense but two of their key players (arguably their two best defensive players) have fairly significant injuries. Sherman has an elbow injury and Thomas has a separated shoulder. Those aren't insignificant injuries and take time to completely heal.
who said it was significant? i only consider it really bad if there was a leg injury. these d men you speak of will be able to cover one hand or not

I think what a lot of people are overlooking is the fact that the Pats defense is better than people realize
no denver's was better ly and offense better than this pats team ty. den had a top run stuffing d. pats dont. pats rank 17th in pass coverage.
playing in the afc east even makes them look better than their actual rank.
consider also that the pats who held comfy leads in many games- it actually forced the other team to abandon the run
this pats d is not good. lynch and wilson will run through them like a hot knife through butter
 

New member
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Messages
2,196
Tokens
Tom Brady position is a lot better than P. Manning and he knew that very well more than you. So what, even he lost, he still better than Manning at least in rings and post season record. The only thing Brady is asking himself that when he can break that 530 TDs record.

Brady win this, prop Manning announce retirement. And I lost 6 units. That's fine to me, Brady and Manning both retired LOL. Looking deep into Pats stats last 4-5 games.....sorry, they didn't show up much balance on running and passing on the O#, and same thing with D#. The only game they played above expectation was last game vs the Colts, and ton of people bite that. Why don't people asking the Colt for playing the worst game of the year? LOL.

This is a real game, not a Play Station game that saying they should do this, do that. You are not the manager. NFL is the manager. You play the game by their rule, not the way that you imagine in your mind.

Should be a good game. Seattle and the OVER to the bank.

Good luck to your play.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 30, 2008
Messages
711
Tokens
Wasn't Peyton in the same predicament last year....his window was open and closed..no difference with Brady..actually denvers team last year was better than this pats team.

I don't think it's going to be easy this time for Seattle. Belichick and Brady are not gonna lay an egg in the Super Bowl like the Broncos last year. Green Bay exposed a lot of Seattle's weaknesses last week and I think the Patriots will pick up on it.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
49,218
Tokens
I don't think it's going to be easy this time for Seattle. Belichick and Brady are not gonna lay an egg in the Super Bowl like the Broncos last year. Green Bay exposed a lot of Seattle's weaknesses last week and I think the Patriots will pick up on it.

Agree mantero.

Anyone who compares the Pats to last year's Broncos just doesn't get it. I really hope Seattle is doing just that.

Good luck to you mantero.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 30, 2008
Messages
711
Tokens
I think New England is the better team this year at this point in time. I can't buy into Seattle having the needed offense to score more points than the Patriots. Seattle's receiving core lost a couple key players. They got rid of Harvin mid-season and let Golden Tate go to Detroit. I'm not convinced they can win the big game against the Pats with the receiving core they have.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
I think New England is the better team this year at this point in time. I can't buy into Seattle having the needed offense to score more points than the Patriots. Seattle's receiving core lost a couple key players. They got rid of Harvin mid-season and let Golden Tate go to Detroit. I'm not convinced they can win the big game against the Pats with the receiving core they have.



and without Paul Richardson who was coming on... Golden Tate was big time for this team. I do not think Jermain Kearse is very good at all. I like the TE Luke Wilson but the Patriots have a very deep linebacker core that can shut him down.

Seattle is going to have to pull some shit out of a hat to win this game.


I think someone tries to do a fake and fucks it up because the other team is ready for it.

Patriots cheat to win super bowls so I don't know why this would be any different than their other super bowl wins. I say Pats by 4
 

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,811
Tokens
I think New England is the better team this year at this point in time. I can't buy into Seattle having the needed offense to score more points than the Patriots. Seattle's receiving core lost a couple key players. They got rid of Harvin mid-season and let Golden Tate go to Detroit. I'm not convinced they can win the big game against the Pats with the receiving core they have.

I thought defense wins championships?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,870
Messages
13,574,445
Members
100,879
Latest member
am_sports
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com