How the Taliban got to Yale

Search

Living...vicariously through myself.
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
8,456
Tokens
May 9, 2006 So the decision was made by everybody and nobody.
divider_line_gray.gif



MEDIA HELP TALIBAN YALIE COME TO U.S.
By Wes Vernon
A former spokesman for the Taliban government of Afghanistan is now a student at Yale on a student visa. One of his courses is "Terrorism: Past, Present, and Future." A freelance cameraman/producer who has worked for CBS helped the young man get to Yale and along the way, reports the New York Times, the student was also offered a job at CNN. Yale officials prize this as a diversity pick, and quickly signed him up lest Harvard beat them to it.
At first blush, all of that would seem to be a bad joke. But it's true, and Senator John Cornyn, a member of the Armed Services, Budget and Judiciary committees, is not amused. The Texas Republican has written the Department of Homeland Security reminding Secretary Michael Chertoff that "an alien is inadmissible or removable on terror-related grounds if he is a representative of any designated or nondesignated terrorist organization."
The New York Times Magazine on Feb. 26 ran a long article headlined, "He was the Taliban's spin doctor. So what's he doing at Yale?"
About 95% of those who apply for admission to Yale (most with outstanding scholastic records) are rejected. That raises the question as to how Sayed Rahmatullah Hashemi, with a fourth grade education and a "high school equivalency" degree, got such a helping hand and/or approval from the federal government, the media, and academia. We're not talking here about another candidate for admission whose scholastic credentials were at the very least questionable. We are talking about a former high official of a government that wanted to wipe Western Civilization off the map. Attempting to unravel how all this came about and who is responsible is something akin to trying to nail jello to the wall.
The Media Role
The sympathetic portrayal of Rahmatullah in the New York Times article is misleading in places. It leaves the clear impression that Mike Hoover—the cameraman who befriended Rahmatullah—was on assignment for CBS News. CBS tells AIM the network has had no contact whatsoever with Hoover since 1992. Re-reading the relevant part of the article that connected Hoover with CBS, and with a lawyer's pinpoint- dotted "I" and crossed "T" perspective, one finds wording to the effect that while Hoover has indeed done work in Afghanistan for CBS in the past, it does not specifically say that he was working for that news outlet during his more recent visit there though—again—the wording does leave that impression. Exactly who was Hoover's client on that occasion? We don't know. The article doesn't say. CBS said it had no contact information on him.
The author of the New York Times article, a freelance writer named Chip Brown, simply describes Hoover as "one of the few news cameramen who had been given Taliban permission to visit Afghanistan" at that time. Rahmatullah had been assigned as Hoover's "guide and translator." The two struck up a friendship that ultimately led to the young student's admission to Yale.
The secrecy surrounding Hoover's precise role here (He has been dodging the media since the New York Times magazine article) has caused some to wonder if perhaps this is all a U.S. intelligence operation through which Rahmatullah was being rewarded as an informer. But Center for Security Policy president Frank Gaffney, in a conversation prior to a speech at an AIM luncheon, concurred in the belief that this is more likely what it appears to be: a case of too many people in government, the media, and certainly academia not understanding the nature of the enemy and going along with a politically correct "diversity" move. (Gaffney appeared at the AIM luncheon to discuss his book, War Footing: 10 Steps America Must Take to Prevail in the War for the Free World).
The New York Times quotes Hoover as saying Rahmatullah, while enrolled at Yale, would be something of a teacher/ambassador.
A Media Curiosity
Liberal media outlets seem to be fascinated with the young man who was an official apologist for a regime that extracted women's fingernails if they wore fingernail polish, and loaded up women in the back of pickup trucks, drove them around a stadium with leashes around their necks, and then shot them through the head for violating Islamic law.
Prior to ending up at Yale, according to the magazine, Rahmatullah had seriously "considered taking up a friend's offer to work part time for CNN." CNN headquarters in Atlanta claims to be "unaware" of any such offer, though of course, without the name of the person who possibly made an informal offer, it would take some effort to get a yes or no answer from among CNN's personnel scattered around the far-flung corners of the earth.
Freelance writer Chip Brown is avoiding inquiries as to the identity of the "friend" who made the CNN offer and also the identity of whoever gave Hoover the "news" assignment to be in Afghanistan at that particular time. Rahmatullah has been seen on Fox News running away from a camera and reporter seeking answers, though both he and Hoover had spoken freely with Brown.
State Department spokesman Justin Higgins told AIM that Rahmatullah had applied for the student visa in Islamabad, Pakistan (The New York Times article said he had applied in Peshawar, Pakistan). Higgins said granting him the visa was "an inter-agency decision."
I told him we were not interested in the names of the faceless government workers who may have waved the approval through the paperwork machine that defines much of the federal infrastructure. What AIM wanted to know was this: Who was the person who had all the facts in front of him—the person whose responsibility it was to ask all the right questions? Who was tasked with certifying that the applicant was okay and that—in the "inter-agency" vetting—ex-Taliban spokesman or not—there were no red flags and Rahmatullah was qualified for a student visa in the United States?
Higgins replied that the person who made final judgment and pronounced the application valid and worthy was "the interviewing officer" at the embassy. However, the State Department spokesman said he was forbidden by law to identify the officer by name.
So the decision was made by everybody and nobody. This is the very type of unaccountability that leads to ridicule of the federal bureaucracy on the late-night TV shows and elsewhere. The spokesman for an enemy regime is allowed into the United States in violation of the law (according to Senator Cornyn's letter), but it is also a violation of the law to hold anyone responsible. So the buck stops nowhere.
Or maybe not. Going after another link in the "inter-agency" chain, Senator Cornyn may have better luck with the Homeland Security Department than we had with State. He reminds Secretary Chertoff that Rahmatullah was part of a regime that "gave safe haven and other material support to Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, and continued to do so even after the terrorist attacks of September 11th." The senator demands to know "whether the Department of Homeland Security will seek to deport [Rahmatullah] under one of the terror-related grounds of removal."
Senator Cornyn notes that the 9/11 commission found "that the key officials responsible for determining alien admissions (consular officials abroad and immigration inspectors in the United States) were not considered full partners in counter-terrorism efforts prior to September 11, 2001, and as a result, opportunities to intercept the September 11 terrorists were missed."
His U.S. Job
Prior to 9/11, Rahmatullah was in the U.S. visiting editorial boards and reporters at news-papers around the country, defending the Taliban and excusing bin Laden, whom he described as a "guest" of his government and adding there was "no proof" bin Laden was actually tied to a terrorist bombing, as if taking refuge in a land dominated by a terrorist regime were the actions of an innocent man.
John Fund of the Wall Street Journal, in a series of articles (on the Journal's website Opinion Journal.com, with a follow-up on the Journal's print op-ed page on March 23) has bird-dogged this story starting the day the Times magazine article appeared. He has cited the outrage of Yale alumni, both liberals and conservatives (This is no "right-wing" issue). Two protesting Yale alums—Clinton Taylor and Debbie Bookstaber—received an angry e-mail from Alexis Suronov, assistant director of giving at Yale Law School, saying in part, "What's the matter with you? Are you retarded?" The e-mail was anonymous, but easily traced.
Suronov told Fund he was "only vaguely aware of Taliban practices." That sums up the core problem right there. Yale was turning aside all requests for interviews on its Taliban student, issuing only a short, written statement resembling a description of the arsonist who rushes in to put out the fire. Yale notes that Rahmatullah "escaped the wreckage of Afghanistan" and that "universities are places of understanding, especially of the most difficult issues that face the world."
Interesting that an official of the regime that created the "wreckage" could "escape" it. Would Yale have proffered "understanding" to Hitler's propagandist Joseph Goebbels had he "escaped" Nazi Germany and applied for a visa? What about an aspiring mob lawyer who says there is "no proof" that he did not "escape" joining all those dead bodies buried in a vacant lot in Queens?
During his pre-9/11 PR visit to the U.S., Rahmatullah (whose official title was "second foreign secretary") wore white baggy pants, an official turban, complete with the full beard expected of a good Taliban rep. Now, on the Yale campus, the facial hair is cut short, including a mustache. He wears regular student clothing, complete with backpack. These days, he could pass for any Keokuk, Iowa farm boy.
Senator Cornyn wants DHS to brief him on its progress "in assigning officers to the consulate in Islamabad [as provided by law] and whether those officers are fully integrated into the visa screening process."
This story has been kept alive by talk radio, Fox News, and the Internet. After the fawning New York Times magazine article, there has been little or no follow-up by the mainstream media. If Yale alumnus George W. Bush holds a news conference anytime soon, it would be interesting to see if the White House reporters can divert their attention from the silly Valerie Plame case just long enough to direct a question to him about the Taliban spokesman at his alma mater.
 

Rx. Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
3,699
Tokens
Very disturbing, Yale embracing this scumbag Taliban spokesman. The unbelievable decision to give this Taliban gentleman a spot at Yale that could have gone to a deserving, academically qualified American student is punctuated by the fact that Yale has thrown ROTC off campus and anyone participating in that program must drive about 70 miles to do so.

If the Taliban spokesman is welcomed in the name of diversity and tolerance, isn't having military ROTC adding to the diversity as well? I guess it's diversity as long as the wacko-liberals at Yale approve of it. It seems that the interests of academia are more aligned with terrorists than their own defenders. No matter...our military will continue to fight for the right of these academics to make complete fools of themselves.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
Didn't the Republicans and Ronald Reagan put the Taliban in power in the first place? What's the big deal? Now, they want to disown their own people - again? Didn't the Taliban visit the Bush White House? What, selective memory?
 

Rx. Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
3,699
Tokens
What's your point Capn C? That the Taliban are good guys? That it's ok that the spokesman for the most brutal regime of the 20th century is admitted at one of our most prestigious universities, taking the place of an American student who deserved to go?
 

Is that a moonbat in my sites?
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
9,064
Tokens
CAPN CRUNCH said:
Didn't the Republicans and Ronald Reagan put the Taliban in power in the first place? What's the big deal? Now, they want to disown their own people - again? Didn't the Taliban visit the Bush White House? What, selective memory?

What does what Reagan did 25 years ago have to do with the media and the Neo Klan helping a Taliban go to Yale today?

Where did you come up with this convoluted logic to reach such a dumbassed conclusion!

Are you drunk (again)?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
bblight said:
What does what Reagan did 25 years ago have to do with the media and the Neo Klan helping a Taliban go to Yale today?

Where did you come up with this convoluted logic to reach such a dumbassed conclusion!

Are you drunk (again)?
My point is, that you guys put them in power. Gave them the weapons and instructions to use them and all you can bitch about is one of your annointed ones, unlike your appointed one, GWB, is going to the same school as your leader. Whaddup with that? Come on, step up and take your blame along with your medicine before you point fingers at the good guys, the MIGHTY MORPHIN POWER LIBERALS! P.S. BB: YES!
 

Rx. Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
3,699
Tokens
bblight said:
What does what Reagan did 25 years ago have to do with the media and the Neo Klan helping a Taliban go to Yale today?

Where did you come up with this convoluted logic to reach such a dumbassed conclusion!

That's the main liberal tactic...deflect attention from the issue at hand, try to baffle with bullshit...good is bad, bad is good, and then ultimately there's no good or bad, no right or wrong, just moral relativism. When moral relativism is achieved, then anything goes. That's the liberal dream..a world where anything goes with no moral constraints.
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
lets see ...

this is a BIG ISSUE??? funny ... Bush sells out our ports to the UAE and guess what??

They are one of only 3 countries in the Mid East that recognize the Taliban as the Official Govt of Afghanistan

Bush ... yep, that Port Deal was good since bro Neil had his SW company funded to the tune of 23 million by the UAE
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
Anti-liberal said:
What's your point Capn C? That the Taliban are good guys? That it's ok that the spokesman for the most brutal regime of the 20th century is admitted at one of our most prestigious universities, taking the place of an American student who deserved to go?
MY point is that Neo-Cons that live in Glass Mansions should not be throwing rocks at guys that are inconsequential in comparison with the idiots that put them in power.
 

Rx. Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
3,699
Tokens
CAPN CRUNCH said:
all you can bitch about is one of your annointed ones, unlike your appointed one, GWB, is going to the same school as your leader. Whaddup with that?quote]

"Your leader"? If you're an American, he's YOUR leader too. It's amazing to me that you can disassociate yourself from your own country because you don't like was elected President. Even worse, you root against your leader to fail, which would hurt this country, just to justify your own personal political agenda. You have sedition in your heart.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 20, 2006
Messages
1,433
Tokens
Anti-liberal said:
CAPN CRUNCH said:
all you can bitch about is one of your annointed ones, unlike your appointed one, GWB, is going to the same school as your leader. Whaddup with that?quote]

"Your leader"? If you're an American, he's YOUR leader too. It's amazing to me that you can disassociate yourself from your own country because you don't like was elected President. Even worse, you root against your leader to fail, which would hurt this country, just to justify your own personal political agenda. You have sedition in your heart.

You'll have to forgive capn. He left the country when Bush took office.
 

Is that a moonbat in my sites?
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
9,064
Tokens
Anti-liberal said:
CAPN CRUNCH said:
all you can bitch about is one of your annointed ones, unlike your appointed one, GWB, is going to the same school as your leader. Whaddup with that?quote]

"Your leader"? If you're an American, he's YOUR leader too. It's amazing to me that you can disassociate yourself from your own country because you don't like was elected President. Even worse, you root against your leader to fail, which would hurt this country, just to justify your own personal political agenda. You have sedition in your heart.

Yup!
 

Rx. Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
3,699
Tokens
doc mercer said:
lets see ...

They are one of only 3 countries in the Mid East that recognize the Taliban as the Official Govt of Afghanistan

Many countries don't recognize Hamas either. That doesn't mean they are not in power.

Also, we went to war with the Taliban, and American soldiers died fighting the Taliban, which makes Yale's decision to admit this insolent little bastard even more disturbing.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
Anti-liberal said:
CAPN CRUNCH said:
all you can bitch about is one of your annointed ones, unlike your appointed one, GWB, is going to the same school as your leader. Whaddup with that?quote]

"Your leader"? If you're an American, he's YOUR leader too. It's amazing to me that you can disassociate yourself from your own country because you don't like was elected President. Even worse, you root against your leader to fail, which would hurt this country, just to justify your own personal political agenda. You have sedition in your heart.
I don't root against my country. And 'Your leader' was an allusion to GWB and 1984. And unfortunately, GWB and his evil pals need no help in screwing everything up. Observations do not make me rooting against anyone. I would be the first to admit I was wrong and throw GWB a parade if he had succeeded in his follies, but that didn't happen. So, I have to call 'em the way I see 'em because you and all your buddies in the fascist wing have blinders on.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
Anti-liberal said:
Many countries don't recognize Hamas either. That doesn't mean they are not in power.

Also, we went to war with the Taliban, and American soldiers died fighting the Taliban, which makes Yale's decision to admit this insolent little bastard even more disturbing.
And who put the Taliban in power? Here we go again, still haven't answered the first time.
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
and OUR GREAT LEADER belives in military service so much he went AWOL and Scarface took 5 Deferments

Fuck Bush and fuck his POS ass ....

Let me quote DeLay when Clinton sent troops to Bosnia:

I SUPPORT THE TROOPS .. I DONT SUPPORT THE PRESIDENT
 

Rx. Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
3,699
Tokens
Who helped the Taliban to power doesn't matter.

Because Edison harnessed electricity, does that make him responsible for torture by electric shock that goes on in the world?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
Anti-liberal said:
CAPN CRUNCH said:
all you can bitch about is one of your annointed ones, unlike your appointed one, GWB, is going to the same school as your leader. Whaddup with that?quote]

"Your leader"? If you're an American, he's YOUR leader too. It's amazing to me that you can disassociate yourself from your own country because you don't like was elected President. Even worse, you root against your leader to fail, which would hurt this country, just to justify your own personal political agenda. You have sedition in your heart.
So now, you're judging what's in my heart. I'm sorry. I did not know I was talking to GOD!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,894
Messages
13,574,825
Members
100,883
Latest member
messi245
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com