Here's some funny 9/11 conspiracy stuff for ya

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,799
Tokens
This is just too much. And yes, this guy is totally serious. I've highlighted what I feel are the "best" (translation...LMAO) lines in this piece of "research".

Wings Break Off

I set up an experiment testing how a plane might break up upon impacting arrayed steel columns like the WTC wall. The plane and the columns were both constructed of similar pieces of wood (which here favors the plane, since in real life, aluminum is weaker than steel). The dimensions of the models were not perfect, but they were a rough match for the WTC and a 767. I did not put floors into the model, so this also favors the plane.

I pushed the plane forcefully into the "wall", and while the fuselage penetrated the wall after reasonably strong force was applied, the wings broke off at the root where the wings met the plane. The wings actually bent backwards and slid into the hole alongside the fuselage. The wood of the wings actually broke. A few "columns" broke where the fuselage went in, and a couple broke on either side of the fuselage hole, where the wings broke off-- but basically the array of columns were much stronger than the long wings.

This actually makes sense in terms of physics. (Omni's note: LOL!!!!) The fuselage had a concentrated impact force on a relatively small front area, and thus could break the columns inward. However, a wing has a much wider impact area, which dissipates the impact force, thus favoring the columns' strength. If I were an engineer, I'm sure I could find an equation that could describe this phenomenon. Basically, of course, it is the same principle why a pointed object has more penetrating power than a long straight edge-- even if both are equally sharp.

Note that in real-life, the aluminum wings should break off even more readily when they impact heavy steel columns than in this experiment.

This finding that the wings break off also fits with what is observed in other plane crashes: the wings break off.

This means of course, that no 767 hit either WTC tower.

The plane-shaped hole was merely a ruse, to trick people into thinking a large plane had impacted the WTC.
Unfortunately this trick defied physics.


Further: in theory, wings could break through the columns if they had enough mass and momentum. The key point though is that on a plane, the wings are far from the center of mass, they cannot carry enough force to break through the columns and thus their response is to break and fold back. The analogy would be like having your arms stretched straight out and trying to knock down two strong wooden posts on either side of you with your fists. With your whole body behind your hands, you could knock down one post, but your body's force is too diffuse to knock down both posts when your arms are stretched out to the side.

(End of column. Here's the link http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2006/04/wings-break-off.html )

Wow. With hard hitting data research like this, it's a wounder why people still buy the official story, huh?! :103631605

(LOL again)
 

I'm still here Mo-fo's
Joined
Sep 20, 2001
Messages
8,359
Tokens
Now hang on Omni, I thought missles were "dressed up" to look like commercial aircraft???
:icon_conf :smoking:
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,799
Tokens
It would seem this "9/11 researcher" agrees with that conclusion Cussin it. He's not done with his little experiment yet!

"I repeated the experiment I described in the previous post, but this time I made a plane with stronger wings than the first time.

The wings did not break, but I COULD NOT RAM THE PLANE THROUGH THE WALL of columns, even using all my strength. Only after repeated ramming attempts was I able to get the plane inside, and even then it went in sort of sideways, without the wings breaking any extra columns.

Funny-- wings simply will not break columns.

Conclusion: same as before-- no planes (at least no normal planes) hit the WTC towers."


All I have to say is :laughingb :laughingb :laughingb
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
So, you found some crazy guy posting about 9/11. If it was'nt funny the first time around, why is it now?!

Omni, you can make a blog about 9/11 or anything else that you would like. Just like this guy did. Many sites now offer them for free.
 
Last edited:

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,799
Tokens
Sorry Rob, I thought it was pretty damn funny the first time around. Sorry if you don't think so.

Besides, I've seen countless threads started here about 9/11 conspiracy stuff, all of them by people who agree with the conspiracy. Yet I have only started 2 (anti-conspiracy) threads on the subject, this one a while back and the Pentagon one yesterday. That makes only 2 anti conspiracy threads total, yet you have already called this one out. WTF?

Just make sure the next time someone posts 9/11 conspiracy bullshit here that you do the fair thing and tell them too that they can make a blog about it instead.
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
Omni, I don't mean to jump on your case. You are free to do as you like.
I did'nt realize you added a new link at first.

It's just that you're presenting stuff that might be funny, but you will be hard pressed to find anyone here that agrees with those things.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,799
Tokens
OK, no worries Rob.

It's always hard to know if what one thinks is funny will necessarily translate to someone else. I think it's funny to see this guy seriously trying to prove something by shoving a model plane into a wooden WTC, or in the latest case setting his rabbit cage on fire to try and simulate the whole thing, but then again I spend way too much time on the whole subject...maybe I'm just too immursed in the subject to realize it's not as funny as I think. (Some of my other 9/11 research buddies thought it was hilarious.)
 

RX Stud
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Messages
118
Tokens
Omni, everyone knows that an arab sheikh, working together with Strom Thurmond, spray-painted a couple of missles to look like planes and launched them into the WTC. It was all part of their master plan to control the world's supply of humus.
 

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Tokens
STILL no pictures of whatever hit the Pentagon yet.
4-5 years and still nothing.

tick tock tick tock
 

New member
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
1,164
Tokens
eek. said:
STILL no pictures of whatever hit the Pentagon yet.
4-5 years and still nothing.

tick tock tick tock

How about a picture of the passengers? thats alot of memorial services for people who are alive.
 

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Tokens
Where's that Liberal press ?
Where's the outrage ?

tick tock tick tock
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,761
Messages
13,572,493
Members
100,859
Latest member
hb88kimcomm
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com