GoSooners Plays For Week 2

Search

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
Last week was a crappy start to the season. Not only for my plays but because of OU losing right out of the gate. And with the Sooners losing both Bradford and Gresham, it doesn't look good for the rest of the season. OU had only 5 starters back on offense to begin with. Without these two players there are now only 3 starters back from last season's highest scoring offense. There are 4 cogs to the offense. The OL, QB, RB, WR's. And OU has now lost 3 of those cogs, which is usually the kiss of death. Even for the BCS powers. Hopefully Bradford will make a quicker than expected return and OU can at least play the spoiler role in conference this season.

Overall the Big 12 looked very good last week with the exception of Colorado. it looks like it's going to be more of the same with this team. Maybe worse. I can see now why Hawkins avoided talking about his defense this summer. They stunk. The D-Line is weak. And the secondary is very unstable and gave up way too many big plays. The offense looked about the the same, maybe worse. They didn't have the running game they were expected to have. And the playcalling was lousy. Overall, not a good effort at all from the Buffs. And in order for Hawkins statement of the Buffs winning 10 games this season to come true, they may have to end up playing 30 games. I don't know what is going to happen this week at Toledo. But if Hawkins doesn't win this one, he may not last the season. And their chances probably aren't that great since they've only won 2 road games in the last 3 years. That won't get it done.

Last Week:

** Plays 1-4
*** Plays 1-1


Iowa State (+6.5) over Iowa **

This is almost a no-brainer for me every year. ISU has always been the ugly stepchild team of the state of Iowa. And they ALWAYS play way above their heads in this game. As a rule it takes Iowa about a half a season to really get cranked up. And as good as they look on paper, they never seem ready or at full strength when these two teams meet. Iowa either loses this game or they play just good enough to win. They very seldom give you more than that when these two rivals meet. This year Iowa will face a more balanced ISU offense under the direction of OC Tom Herman, who made Rice's offense a big success for the last couple of years. And the Clones have a dangerous duo threat QB Arnaud running the show. So with their clever new coordinator calling the plays, Iowa may have a few unexpected matchup problems to deal with. And with the lack of playmakers that I'm seeing with Iowa right now, it may only take 2 or 3 big plays and a couple scores by ISU to cover or win this game. I think the lack of a decent running game without Shonn Greene, and now without his replacement, is going to put too much pressure on Stanzi this year to make the plays. I think Stanzi is an adequate QB, but from the times that I've seen him play, nothing special. He also better have his O-Line protecting him better than they did last week if they have any hope of winning this game. He was sacked 4 times against an FCS team. And new coach Paul Rhodes (ex Auburn DC) is coaching this ISU defense to be a little more agressive. I'm not sure that Iowa's near loss last week was that much of a fluke. They just aren't that good on offense right now. They have a great defense that will probably keep them in any game this year. But being a TD favorite on the road is another story. I like the Clones here in yet another close state rivalry game.


Wake Forest/Stanford (OVER 44) **

This is kind of an unusual cross country matchup between two middle of the road teams. And the first time these teams have meant. It looks like it's going to be Stanford's ground game against Wake's passing game. I still think these teams are lacking a little in defense. Although probably improved a little from last season, Stanford's pass defense up to now has been weak. I think their strong run game is going to help them get more covers and wins this year. But I think they'll be in a few high scoring contests when they go up against the good balanced offenses in their league. On the other side Wake lost pretty much everybody off of what was their best defensive unit under Grobe. But even last season with their best D unit, the total still went over this 44 number in 5 of their games. And with a weaker defense but a stronger offense, I expect more overs from Wake this year. I just got through watching the replay of the Wake/Baylor game today, and Riley Skinner was just a hair off on his passes, which caused him to throw 3 int's. Very uncharacteristic for him. But he was very close with his passes being right on the fingertips of his WR's... I think he'll be much sharper in this second game against what I believe will be a weaker defense than what Wake faced against Baylor last week. Let's not forget that Skinner pretty much holds the passing records for Wake and the ACC in a few categories. He can get it done. And you very seldom will see him or this Wake team throw in two bad games like that in a row under Grobe. I look for more points here from Wake than what we saw in a rusty offensive performance last week. And I don't think they'll be able to stop Stanford's ground game, when they gave up 200 yards to Baylor last week.. They'll get their points too. I'm liking the over here.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
2,864
Tokens
Good luck, GS . . . .
stpatrick2.gif
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
Texas Tech (-27.5) over Rice **

Maybe not a name your own score game, but pretty close to it. It is pretty obvious by last week's game against UAB that Rice isn't anything close to the same team they were last season when Clement called the signals. They not only lose Clement, they also lose stud WR Dillard. And maybe just as bad lost their OC Herman to Iowa State. So you have new offensive skill players working with a new coordinator. And it showed last week with Rice scoring just 24 points. Much less than their 2008 average. There is also somewhat of a QB controversy. Or maybe less of a controversy than the coach can't really make up his mind between two mediocre QB's. And they both played last week with average at best results against a UAB defense that was much weaker than the TT defense they face this week. Defensively, Rice wasn't very good either in giving up 516 total yards including almost 300 yards rushing and nearly 8 ypc. And we know that TT will throw much more at them offensively. Although a rookie QB, TT QB Potts still had over 400 yards passing last week to something like 10 different receivers. So this is still pretty much the same dangerous TT offense. I look for Leach to play Potts pretty much the whole game to give him the reps and to aim more to cut out mistakes before their big game with Texas next week. Leach will want a dominating performance here to give his offense some confidence going into next week's game. And after their lackluster performance last week against North Dakota in which they scored just 38 points, I expect the Red Raiders to come out swinging here. Rice has been an absolutely terrible ATS team when facing BCS opponents the last few years. And that's been when they had better teams. I promise you if they have a chance, Leach won't call off the dogs here. I look for a blowout. And I think TT has a good enough defense to hold off any backdoor cover.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 21, 2008
Messages
236
Tokens
GL gs, tough week last week, but a bad week is much better then a bad season... duh. I like that total in the Stanford game. I am looking at playing a few 1st halfs this week. The one game that I have been waiting to play for weeks is Southern Miss -15. UCF will be out of this game by the end of the 1st quarter and USM's coach doesn't take his foot off the gas at all. USM has a pretty tough schedule but they could possibly be a BCS buster this year, all of the games are winnable (Louisville, UVA and ECU) and provide enough meat to get them into the top 16 for the BCS if they go undefeated. A couple of other games I was looking at was Oregon, I think they rebound nicely here, they have been getting crapped on for 9 days and all they want to do is silence their critics. As for the Big 10... well I would say the two teams that looked the best last week were Michigan and Purdue but I have no faith in Purdue so I like the Ducks in this spot. I was looking at playing the 1st half in the Navy game, LA tech gave up a ton of rushing yards last week and if anybody can exploit a crappy run defense it's Navy. I'm not a huge fan of the -7.5 so I was thinking about taking Navy -4 for the first half figuring that it may take Tech some time to get used to the option. Better luck this week.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
GL gs, tough week last week, but a bad week is much better then a bad season... duh. I like that total in the Stanford game. I am looking at playing a few 1st halfs this week. The one game that I have been waiting to play for weeks is Southern Miss -15. UCF will be out of this game by the end of the 1st quarter and USM's coach doesn't take his foot off the gas at all. USM has a pretty tough schedule but they could possibly be a BCS buster this year, all of the games are winnable (Louisville, UVA and ECU) and provide enough meat to get them into the top 16 for the BCS if they go undefeated. A couple of other games I was looking at was Oregon, I think they rebound nicely here, they have been getting crapped on for 9 days and all they want to do is silence their critics. As for the Big 10... well I would say the two teams that looked the best last week were Michigan and Purdue but I have no faith in Purdue so I like the Ducks in this spot. I was looking at playing the 1st half in the Navy game, LA tech gave up a ton of rushing yards last week and if anybody can exploit a crappy run defense it's Navy. I'm not a huge fan of the -7.5 so I was thinking about taking Navy -4 for the first half figuring that it may take Tech some time to get used to the option. Better luck this week.
I'm still looking at the Southern Miss game. I've got to admit it's looks very tempting. And I really like their HC. Oregon is in a good situational spot and is on my radar. Usually the best time to bet on a team is when most everybody has lost faith in them. The one thing that does concern me is the rushing game. Oregon's lack of it last week and Purdue's big rushing against Toledo. And Oregon showing some defensive holes in the run game against Boise. So I'm still thinking this one over. With the La Tech/Navy game I'm favoring La Tech. But haven't decided if it's a strong enough play for me. I just think the Auburn team they faced last week has much more muscle up front than Navy has. La Tech also didn't know exactly what to expect from Auburn's new offense last week. They pretty much know what's coming at them with Navy. Plus i think La Tech can move the ball in this game and keep it close. They aren't playing nearly as stout of a defense as they did with Auburn. The one thing right now that concerns me with this LT team is the outbreak of the swine flu that has hit them. Luckily it did hit the team early in the week. So they might be over it by the weekend. But they probably lost some precious practice time in preparing for this Navy option. So this game is still a little bit up in the air with me. GL this weekend.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
12,479
Tokens
On the Iowa State game too .......Just wanted to wish you the best along the way an thanks for your work here ......
douglas

I think we matched up on this one last year with a wild win late ?
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
GS: Have you checked out N. Car this week. I like T Tech and S. Miss is one I am looking at also. BOL.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
2,131
Tokens
Good stuff..

GoSooners, been looking at the Texas Tech game all week and your write-up probably just talked me into it. Leach always likes to throw big numbers up and make a big statement.

echampion, I have a buddy at Central Florida and he says they are just absolutely awful. I will be looking at the Southern Miss game as well. Might be worth making sure Southern Miss is at full strength. I know Ole Miss' team has been devastated by the flu (read that 28 players missed practice yesterday). Hopefully, Southern isn't facing a similar situation.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
SoonerBS...As always BOL this week buddy. And I know revenge is immenent next time we hook up for golf.

oceanguy...BOL my friend.:103631605

Furmaski...I hope your right. Luckily my plays were small last week. Like most of them will be this week. This looks like a very weak card for week two. Not very many strong playable games out there.


Gyno, Pags and jbbragg...i'm always glad when we're on the same side of our plays. GL fellas. :toast:

douglas...I remember that game well last year. It was the first time a self-induced safety ever turned out to be my friend. :lol:
SEC Player...It looks like this flu bug is really hitting these teams hard in the south. At least Ole Miss picked a good time to get it, when they have a bye week.

Russ...I'm looking pretty hard at Southern Miss right now. They could very well be the breakout team in college football in Fedora's second year of his system. And a ton of players coming back. The North Carolina game scares me. Although he isn't a bad QB, I worry about TJ Yates getting it done on the road if UCONN stops or slows down their running game. NC missed Brandon Tate after he went down last year. And from what I see coming back could be missing him again this season. Yates didn't look good passing the ball last week. Luckily they ran for over 300 yards on the Citidal and didn't need him. It could be a different story this week against a pretty stout UCONN run defense. I see both teams having the same problems here. They'll both probably have mixed results running the ball. And mistakes will be made in the passing game. The team who makes the fewest mistakes should cover or win the game. UCONN made them at NC last year with those 3 blocked punts that led to scores. But I'm expecting a low scoring game this year. The under (45.5) could be a decent play for this game.
 

The Gr8 1
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
6,372
Tokens
I am thinking hard about that Texas Tech game as well. I keep going back and forth. There is another capper who I respect also on Texas Tech so you guys are pushing me into playing them more and more.
 

I can handicap circles around your ass!!
Joined
Oct 30, 2007
Messages
2,377
Tokens
I am rooting big time for Texas Tech to beat Rice by 50 points. I also want Texas to struggle a little bit at Wyoming. I want that line as low as possible for next week's Texas Tech/Texas so that i can make Texas my chalk play of the week next week.

Good luck this week GS.....
 

New member
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
344
Tokens
I always look forward to your writeups. I am definitely more comfortable with the possibility of pulling the trigger on Iowa St.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 27, 2004
Messages
424
Tokens
GS Thanks again for all your hardwork. Love those writeups of yours, dont alsways agree but love your opinion in the Big 12 for sure..
Remember a few years ago when you got on the Longhorns and the Over for a few weeks? Well it was good, and they were very good last week and the over cashed as well. I always try to be on the doggie in those interstate matchups.
As Always a GREAT week to ya.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,787
Messages
13,572,983
Members
100,862
Latest member
brokenplanethoodiec
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com