GoSooners
Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2004
- Messages
- 28,800
- Reaction score
- 48
Last week (5-4) Season (11-7)
The Big 12 redeemed itself somewhat with Iowa State and Texas beating up on the Big 10. It's funny how I'm now hearing Ohio St. and Iowa aren't any good any more. They're good. They just got beat. Shit happens. Move on. Besides these 2 teams and maybe Texas Tech and Colorado, the Big 12 still consists of a bunch of dogs who haven't earned my respect. Texas still has 9 games to play. Vince Young may or may not win the Heisman, but he gets my vote for most valuable player. Because if Young goes down Texas season will too.
Picks of the week:
Ucla (-7) over OU...I had no doubt after watching OU these past 2 weeks who i was going to take in this game. After a closer look at UCLA and a few things that's happened in the OU camp my feelings have gone from UCLA winning this by 4 or 5 TD's to maybe OU holding this down to a 14 points or less game. First off with UCLA,: I've never had too much respect for a coach who makes the same mistakes over and over. As in when UCLA played OU here a couple of years ago and while HC Dorrell was in an apparent coma his team continued to kick the ball to Anthony Perkins, and he continued to return the ball for touchdowns. It took OU breaking an NCAA record before this coach realized that maybe we might want to think about kicking away from this guy. But by that time OU had layed 59 points up. Game over.
As for this team matching up with OU; I believe offensivly they match up very well. I did get to see the UCLA-San Diego game, and i was very impressed with their RB Drew, and their tight end is one of the hottest in the country. They say their QB is adequate, nothing special and has trouble throwing the long ball. Thus a lot of tight end route passes.
On the other side of the ball is where UCLA has it's weaknesses. The defensive line isn't very strong. And their DB's are young, small and inconsistent.
With OU the problems are many. Let's start with the QB. Both Thompson and Bomar are simply too inexpierenced to run the Jason White style of OU offense we've had for the last 5 years. Too many throws into double and triple coverages have caused these coaches to make changes. The receivers are all young and haven't learned how to get seperation from the DB's. The offensive line is just terrible..period. No lineman..Let me repeat no lineman has started at the same position he started the week before. Centers are moving to guard..Guard to center..tackles to guard etc..Some are moving out of the lineup entirely. OU will be starting 2 freshman at tackle this week to replace the 2 seniors who weren't performing. Although not as obvious, I believe this OU defense still has a lot of problems to solve. With injuries to the defensive line what kind of pass rush are we going to be able to put on a much better UCLA offense? Our defensive backs are all young. They haven't done what i would call a bad job. They don't seem to be out of place as much and are holding their positions a little better than last year. Their tackling could be better. And when they faced some good talent last week with Tulsa TE Mills they had problems. This UCLA TE is even better. I hope OU has answers for this guy. OU also hasn't faced a good RB like Drew.
This week I've learned that OU is pretty much going to junk the offense they've been using and are going to simplify things for their rookie QB. I'm hearing they are going to go almost exlusivley with a 2 back set with Peterson and Runnells and play some smashmouth football. You saw a little bit of that against Tulsa last week when OU decided Bomar was making too many mistakes and decided to do nothing but run and see what happens. OU didn't throw one pass in the second half. I'm also hearing they're going to get J.D.Runnells more into the offensive schemes. All I can say about that is that it's about time. This guy is a big time talent that's been way underused. Bomar will be under center much more. And they've utilized some run plays for him to give OU yet another weapon. When OU does go with the shotgun look, it will be primarily for the short safe underneath routes to their tight end. Something else OU hasn't done this year. From what I'm hearing Long has been afraid of getting the QB's hurt. Which is why they haven't done any QB run plays. With the desperation OU is facing on offense that's all out the window. These QB's were recruited because of their running ability and it's about time they use it. Look for offensive line coach Wilson to finally get his way and begin to start utilizing the type of offense he had when he was at Northwestern. And they ran their QB's a bunch their.
The problem with all of these changes is you can't do it in just one week. This is a transition period for OU. And it's going to take weeks to get this new system down. It's still not clear how well these 2 huge freshman lineman are going to perform. I can tell you that big freshman never have the conditioning to go a whole game this early in the season. So that will be a factor. How QB Bomar takes to this system and a new playbook will be another. My guess is that OU will struggle in the first half and Adrianne Peterson will start finding some holes to run through in the second half when the UCLA line starts to get a little worn down. On the other side of the ball i don't think OU's young defense is going to have much success stopping UCLA from moving the chains. Tulsa and TCU were both successful at dinking and dunking down the field on OU. And with the added deminsion of a good running game I think UCLA will put up enough points to cover.
I still think the linemakers are off with OU and basing the spreads on the team OU has been for the last 6 years under Stoops. It's meant that I've made some easy money in the first 2 weeks. And I believe we still have one more week before these lines start adjusting to OU's talent level. We were lucky OU scored those 2 junk TD's at the end of a tight game last week or else these lines could very well be in the 9 or 10 range. I think we're getting a gift here. And I'm taking advantage. In a high scoring game UCLA wins it 42-27
I'll be back later with the rest of my Big 12 angle playes. GL
The Big 12 redeemed itself somewhat with Iowa State and Texas beating up on the Big 10. It's funny how I'm now hearing Ohio St. and Iowa aren't any good any more. They're good. They just got beat. Shit happens. Move on. Besides these 2 teams and maybe Texas Tech and Colorado, the Big 12 still consists of a bunch of dogs who haven't earned my respect. Texas still has 9 games to play. Vince Young may or may not win the Heisman, but he gets my vote for most valuable player. Because if Young goes down Texas season will too.
Picks of the week:
Ucla (-7) over OU...I had no doubt after watching OU these past 2 weeks who i was going to take in this game. After a closer look at UCLA and a few things that's happened in the OU camp my feelings have gone from UCLA winning this by 4 or 5 TD's to maybe OU holding this down to a 14 points or less game. First off with UCLA,: I've never had too much respect for a coach who makes the same mistakes over and over. As in when UCLA played OU here a couple of years ago and while HC Dorrell was in an apparent coma his team continued to kick the ball to Anthony Perkins, and he continued to return the ball for touchdowns. It took OU breaking an NCAA record before this coach realized that maybe we might want to think about kicking away from this guy. But by that time OU had layed 59 points up. Game over.
As for this team matching up with OU; I believe offensivly they match up very well. I did get to see the UCLA-San Diego game, and i was very impressed with their RB Drew, and their tight end is one of the hottest in the country. They say their QB is adequate, nothing special and has trouble throwing the long ball. Thus a lot of tight end route passes.
On the other side of the ball is where UCLA has it's weaknesses. The defensive line isn't very strong. And their DB's are young, small and inconsistent.
With OU the problems are many. Let's start with the QB. Both Thompson and Bomar are simply too inexpierenced to run the Jason White style of OU offense we've had for the last 5 years. Too many throws into double and triple coverages have caused these coaches to make changes. The receivers are all young and haven't learned how to get seperation from the DB's. The offensive line is just terrible..period. No lineman..Let me repeat no lineman has started at the same position he started the week before. Centers are moving to guard..Guard to center..tackles to guard etc..Some are moving out of the lineup entirely. OU will be starting 2 freshman at tackle this week to replace the 2 seniors who weren't performing. Although not as obvious, I believe this OU defense still has a lot of problems to solve. With injuries to the defensive line what kind of pass rush are we going to be able to put on a much better UCLA offense? Our defensive backs are all young. They haven't done what i would call a bad job. They don't seem to be out of place as much and are holding their positions a little better than last year. Their tackling could be better. And when they faced some good talent last week with Tulsa TE Mills they had problems. This UCLA TE is even better. I hope OU has answers for this guy. OU also hasn't faced a good RB like Drew.
This week I've learned that OU is pretty much going to junk the offense they've been using and are going to simplify things for their rookie QB. I'm hearing they are going to go almost exlusivley with a 2 back set with Peterson and Runnells and play some smashmouth football. You saw a little bit of that against Tulsa last week when OU decided Bomar was making too many mistakes and decided to do nothing but run and see what happens. OU didn't throw one pass in the second half. I'm also hearing they're going to get J.D.Runnells more into the offensive schemes. All I can say about that is that it's about time. This guy is a big time talent that's been way underused. Bomar will be under center much more. And they've utilized some run plays for him to give OU yet another weapon. When OU does go with the shotgun look, it will be primarily for the short safe underneath routes to their tight end. Something else OU hasn't done this year. From what I'm hearing Long has been afraid of getting the QB's hurt. Which is why they haven't done any QB run plays. With the desperation OU is facing on offense that's all out the window. These QB's were recruited because of their running ability and it's about time they use it. Look for offensive line coach Wilson to finally get his way and begin to start utilizing the type of offense he had when he was at Northwestern. And they ran their QB's a bunch their.
The problem with all of these changes is you can't do it in just one week. This is a transition period for OU. And it's going to take weeks to get this new system down. It's still not clear how well these 2 huge freshman lineman are going to perform. I can tell you that big freshman never have the conditioning to go a whole game this early in the season. So that will be a factor. How QB Bomar takes to this system and a new playbook will be another. My guess is that OU will struggle in the first half and Adrianne Peterson will start finding some holes to run through in the second half when the UCLA line starts to get a little worn down. On the other side of the ball i don't think OU's young defense is going to have much success stopping UCLA from moving the chains. Tulsa and TCU were both successful at dinking and dunking down the field on OU. And with the added deminsion of a good running game I think UCLA will put up enough points to cover.
I still think the linemakers are off with OU and basing the spreads on the team OU has been for the last 6 years under Stoops. It's meant that I've made some easy money in the first 2 weeks. And I believe we still have one more week before these lines start adjusting to OU's talent level. We were lucky OU scored those 2 junk TD's at the end of a tight game last week or else these lines could very well be in the 9 or 10 range. I think we're getting a gift here. And I'm taking advantage. In a high scoring game UCLA wins it 42-27
I'll be back later with the rest of my Big 12 angle playes. GL