Good news: update on those Russian jammers and Pentagon assessment

[Jazz]

The still ongoing CENTCOM daily briefing revealed that the US has in fact detected the Iraqis attempting to use those jammers and have destroyed six of them, one of them with a GPS precision munition - lol. When asked directly if these jammers are having any effect, the answer from the AF general was absolutely none.

Maybe the Russians just sold them those knowing they wouldn't work, as well as a controlling interest in the Brooklyn Bridge - that's great news, both for us and the civilians. We still might have problems, though, but it was nice to hear this. As far as the night vision equipment goes, it's a different story entirely.

 

[grantt]

Jazz wrote "When asked directly if these jammers are having any effect, the answer from the AF general was absolutely none." You wait Jazz and see what they blame the high number of civilian casualties on. It will be the Russians and their jammers.

 

[PatPatriot]

When the jammers don't work the ragheads will blame it on the jewish russian merchants,ripping off the religion of peace.

 

Less than a week and we've already found out some of what the Ruskies were up to. Can't wait to see to what degree the pukes from France & Germany have gone to prop up their favorite tyrant. Me doth think they protesteth WAY too much.

 

[Jazz]

Grantt: you are incredibly predictable, not quite as a precision munition, but close.

You will never admit anything you may hear from the coalition is true, and when you suspect it might be, you trot out some other BS.

I'm going to ask you a few questions, just so I understand your bias:

1 - I was born in America, have lived here all of my life - where were you born, raised, and where do you live now?

2 - I am conservative, with some 'liberal' opinions - I believe in democracy and republic forms of government, and thoroughly approve of capitalism - how about you?

3 - My primary reaction is not to distrust everything my government says and place instead my trust in what foreign media sources report - do you?

This is not to indict but to reveal your source of bias, as I have shown my source of bias.

 

[grantt]

Jazz who did the U.S. hold responsible for Enron. Lets just say the U.S. has a reputation of not hauling people with money up onto the carpet.

 

[grantt]

My Lai masacre look into that war crime and see what happened to those responsible.

 

[Jazz]

Grannt: I am refusing to answer any more of your questions until you answer mine. You have ducked a lot of them, including a question about the Russian's supplying of the night-vision goggles. The reason is that you are so biased, and the only one here in the forum who I've reacted this way to, is that I don't owe you the attention you apparently demand from me when you continually refuse to answer other questions.

 

[ShamelessSchill]

Jazz,
How can anyonw who supports a $75 billion dollar war (down payment) that will waste lives etc and a president that took a HUGE surplus and turned it into a HUGE debt be considered CONSERVATITVE.

I think that right wingers, bigots and racists (I am not saying that you are all three) should start calling themselves something different than conservative. By the way, what is your token liberal opinions?

 

[Jazz]

Schill: what's the point? You already accused me of double talk.

Grantt: ducking again, right?

 

[PatPatriot]

Schill how much did clintons wars cost? How comes when it comes to wastefull useless goverment social programs the dems and the libs never consider cost but when it comes to the american peoples security they count every penny?

 

[ShamelessSchill]

And you are not ducking Jazz?

 

[Jazz]

Schill: I'll answer you another time - right now, I'd like to hear what Grannt has to say. He is expert at ducking questions and I'm fed up with it.

 

[PatPatriot]

Jazz, because he really dosen't know anything..typical bumper sticker mentality.

 

[Jazz]

Well, Pat, I bend over backwards, and in this case Grantt HAS to know the answers to the questions I posed. And until I understand what his bias is, I'm not interested in discussing anything further with him.