EXCLUSIVE: Coronavirus Study Confirms

[StevieRay]

[h=1]Coronavirus Study Confirms, with Exception of New York and New Jersey, Overall Mortality Not Much Different Than a Bad Flu Season[/h]

[h=3]On March 17, 2020, we were the first to identify that the WHO and the WHO’s Director General Tedros were pushing fraudulent numbers regarding the expected mortality of the coronavirus. The WHO over-stated the mortality rate of the virus by at least 30 times.[/h]
[h=3]We then followed up with multiple posts on the subject. We reported on June 7, 2020, a study showed that when looking at the mortality rates for all causes this flu season, things aren’t much worse than a bad flu.[/h]
[h=3]We followed up on this study on June 18th with more current data supporting these results.[/h][h=3]Today we have more information based on more current data that supports our initial observations – that current mortality rates from the China coronavirus are within expectations for an above-average flu season with the exception of NYC.[/h]
[h=3]The actions of the governor and health officials in New York City caused that area to explode with cases and death, especially when compared to the rest of the country.[/h]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ce=Twitter&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons

 

[Mobdeeper7239]

A couple of things jumped out about the speech. First, it is clear that Trump is enormously concerned about being attacked for the trade deal he made with China in January, in the early days of the coronavirus epidemic. Trump’s former National Security Advisor John Bolton’s account of his time in the administration revealed that in June 2019, Trump begged Chinese President Xi Jinping to help him win reelection by agreeing to buy more U.S. agricultural products. This purchase was central to the January trade deal. But the trade deal, which Trump and his people touted as a game-changer for the economy, hurt America’s response to the coronavirus as Trump’s cheery support for Xi Jinping and the way in which the Chinese leader was handling the coronavirus helped slow our own response to the crisis.



Now Trump is eager to distance himself from the earlier deal. The constant refrain of his speech was how hard he has been on China in contrast to how easy Biden had been when he was vice president. “Make no mistake,” Trump said, “We hold China fully responsible for concealing the virus and unleashing it upon the world. They could’ve stopped it. They should’ve stopped it. It would’ve been very easy to do at the source when it happened. In contrast,” he continued, “Joe Biden’s entire career has been a gift to the Chinese Communist Party and to the calamity of — of errors that they’ve made.”


Look no further. This is the real story. Your boy praising China for handling the coronavirus and now blaming China for handling the coronavirus. Can’t make this shit up.

 

[rush__man]

So why are we like this today? I've put thought into this lately. Is it possible that all the elected officials were so wrong about this that if they admit to such their careers are over? They have destroyed countless businesses. If they admit the truth now they might as well resign on the spot. So they continue the hoax in unison to save their own worthless asses. Their only chance to weasel through this is to get to November and hope to win the election then hope they can also hold off and keep a vaccine a secret until that election is over. I think a vaccine is coming soon but will be squashed and discounted by elected officials and the media until they are ready. In the meantime - like nixon said - FUCK THE DOOMED.

 

[rush__man]

A couple of things jumped out about the speech. First, it is clear that Trump is enormously concerned about being attacked for the trade deal he made with China in January, in the early days of the coronavirus epidemic. Trump’s former National Security Advisor John Bolton’s account of his time in the administration revealed that in June 2019, Trump begged Chinese President Xi Jinping to help him win reelection by agreeing to buy more U.S. agricultural products. This purchase was central to the January trade deal. But the trade deal, which Trump and his people touted as a game-changer for the economy, hurt America’s response to the coronavirus as Trump’s cheery support for Xi Jinping and the way in which the Chinese leader was handling the coronavirus helped slow our own response to the crisis.



Now Trump is eager to distance himself from the earlier deal. The constant refrain of his speech was how hard he has been on China in contrast to how easy Biden had been when he was vice president. “Make no mistake,” Trump said, “We hold China fully responsible for concealing the virus and unleashing it upon the world. They could’ve stopped it. They should’ve stopped it. It would’ve been very easy to do at the source when it happened. In contrast,” he continued, “Joe Biden’s entire career has been a gift to the Chinese Communist Party and to the calamity of — of errors that they’ve made.”


Look no further. This is the real story. Your boy praising China for handling the coronavirus and now blaming China for handling the coronavirus. Can’t make this shit up.

nowhere in this thread or the article does it mention trump. PEOPLE I URGE YOU NOT TO RESPOND TO THIS AND TAKE THIS OFF THE INTENDED THREAD MESSAGE.

 

[Mobdeeper7239]

Lmfao. Let me ask you.... do you think Trump has nothing to do with the coronavirus and the situation we are in now? I am sure he would like you to think that. He made it political like he makes everything political and he fucked it up. Our response was atrocious. We get a grade D for our response and it would be an F if not for Fauci

 

[Bozzie]

Great points the constant flip flopping from the top on the Chinese policy.
Watch the dollar vs the yen this year... Blown policy and crushing debt loads are bad news coming up here.

Keep the subject floating

Great post

A couple of things jumped out about the speech. First, it is clear that Trump is enormously concerned about being attacked for the trade deal he made with China in January, in the early days of the coronavirus epidemic. Trump’s former National Security Advisor John Bolton’s account of his time in the administration revealed that in June 2019, Trump begged Chinese President Xi Jinping to help him win reelection by agreeing to buy more U.S. agricultural products. This purchase was central to the January trade deal. But the trade deal, which Trump and his people touted as a game-changer for the economy, hurt America’s response to the coronavirus as Trump’s cheery support for Xi Jinping and the way in which the Chinese leader was handling the coronavirus helped slow our own response to the crisis.



Now Trump is eager to distance himself from the earlier deal. The constant refrain of his speech was how hard he has been on China in contrast to how easy Biden had been when he was vice president. “Make no mistake,” Trump said, “We hold China fully responsible for concealing the virus and unleashing it upon the world. They could’ve stopped it. They should’ve stopped it. It would’ve been very easy to do at the source when it happened. In contrast,” he continued, “Joe Biden’s entire career has been a gift to the Chinese Communist Party and to the calamity of — of errors that they’ve made.”


Look no further. This is the real story. Your boy praising China for handling the coronavirus and now blaming China for handling the coronavirus. Can’t make this shit up.

 

[Knightrofins]

Problem is that its summer time and its NOT flu season

 

[Bozzie]

Lmfao. Let me ask you.... do you think Trump has nothing to do with the coronavirus and the situation we are in now? I am sure he would like you to think that. He made it political like he makes everything political and he fucked it up. Our response was atrocious. We get a grade D for our response and it would be an F if not for Fauci

Very true..Had Trump dealt with this early and in a nationally cohesive manner he'd be crushing it in the polls....
It wouldn't even be close.. science won, Trump's going to lose.
It's that easy.

 

[Bozzie]

[FONT=&quot][h=1]Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt tests positive for coronavirus[/h]

[/FONT]

 

[rush__man]

sorry SR. the pigs have taken it off the intended subject with their random garbage again.

 

[Bozzie]

sorry SR. the pigs have taken it off the intended subject with their random garbage again.

The subject is germane to the conversation.
C19
Get over controlling the narrative here doofus..never works .

 

[StevieRay]

sorry SR. the pigs have taken it off the intended subject with their random garbage again.

Lol. Blaming trump is a battle cry for the idiots

 

[JavyBaez9]

Problem is that its summer time and its NOT flu season

So a black swan illness that no one has antibodies for shows up and spreads rapidly.

It's not worth destroying the global economy. Even if we stopped all the madness this very second and behaved like normal, it'd take until 2023 to fully recover the global economy.

Liberals want to continue this for 2 more years though, so a full recovery from then might take decades. Literally decades.

Some of us seem incapable of analytical skills. We need to weigh the cost of billions of people having lower quality of life than they would have had, vs the cost of 80 and 90 year old people living a few less years.

We make public policy decisions like this every day.

Think about it... if the speed limit was changed to 35 MPH nationally, most people would obey. That means, the number of people involved in car crashes would mostly be teens and men under 30, because those are the people most likely to speed. But the overall number of deaths from car accidents would plummet if the speed limit was 35 MPH nationally.

So why isn't the speed limit 35 MPH nationally?

 

[Bozzie]

Lol. Blaming trump is a battle cry for the idiots

Battle cry for the idiots is he isn't responsible for the horrid response nationally.

fact are he's never had a clue how to deal with this...again ,science won and Trump will lose.

Fact Trumpers

 

[Mobdeeper7239]

Science and racism the two things Trump doesn’t believe in will be what does him in. Kind of humorous but definitely karmic

 

[JavyBaez9]

Battle cry for the idiots is he isn't responsible for the horrid response nationally.

fact are he's never had a clue how to deal with this...again ,science won and Trump will lose.

Fact Trumpers

If you understood anything about state's rights, you'd understand that you should be blaming the governors of hard hit areas.

The mayor of New Orleans blamed New Orleans' problems on Trump not canceling Mardi Gras....

I mean fuck... do you agree with that idiocy? She's the fucking mayor of the city, her job is literally to look after the city of New Orleans... and Trump should have canceled Mardi Gras? Not her?

Please...

The irony is, that if Trump had tried to cancel Mardi Gras, she would have attacked him and refused.

 

[JavyBaez9]

Science and racism the two things Trump doesn’t believe in will be what does him in. Kind of humorous but definitely karmic

Racism definitely exists. When Nick Cannon says "white people are less human and savages" and most of black social media says "Why is everyone mad at him, he was speaking facts" it definitely proves that racism exists in wide numbers in this country. Most people who are racist in this country have black skin though, sad to say. We move on.

 

[Mobdeeper7239]

Terrible attempt at sarcasm, Javi.

 

[JavyBaez9]

Terrible attempt at sarcasm, Javi.

No sarcasm, little lady. Do you agree with Nick Cannon that whites are an inferior racial group, and less human? Just curious. Or is Nick Cannon a racist? Which is it?

 

[Knightrofins]

So a black swan illness that no one has antibodies for shows up and spreads rapidly.

It's not worth destroying the global economy. Even if we stopped all the madness this very second and behaved like normal, it'd take until 2023 to fully recover the global economy.

Liberals want to continue this for 2 more years though, so a full recovery from then might take decades. Literally decades.

Some of us seem incapable of analytical skills. We need to weigh the cost of billions of people having lower quality of life than they would have had, vs the cost of 80 and 90 year old people living a few less years.

We make public policy decisions like this every day.

Think about it... if the speed limit was changed to 35 MPH nationally, most people would obey. That means, the number of people involved in car crashes would mostly be teens and men under 30, because those are the people most likely to speed. But the overall number of deaths from car accidents would plummet if the speed limit was 35 MPH nationally.

So why isn't the speed limit 35 MPH nationally?

Huh?

2 trains 1568 miles apart from each other was leaving. Train A was leaving at 230pm traveling 123 mph towars train B. Train B was leaving at 310 traveling 117 mph towards Train A. When the 2 trains eventually cross paths, what % of the passengers would have tested positive from corona virus?