Epitome of perfection update: U.S. GDP grows a scant 0.2% in first quarter

Search

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,401
Tokens
U.S. GDP grows a scant 0.2% in first quarter


WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - The U.S. grew at a meager 0.2% annual pace in the first three months of 2015, a period marked by severe weather, a major port dispute and a soaring dollar that curbed American exports. Consumer spending, the main engine of growth, slowed sharply to 1.9%, below the average 2.3% increase since the recovery began in mid-2009. Business investment in "structures" such as mining shafts and wells sank 23.1% in the first quarter, reflecting lower spending by U.S. energy companies seeking to cope with suddenly cheap oil. Other companies also cut back on investment amid a surge in the dollar that's made U.S. goods and services more expensive to sell outside the nation's borders. Exports tumbled 7.2% while imports edged up 1.8%. A bigger trade deficit subtracts from GDP. Spending on new home construction, meanwhile, rose a scant 1.3% as severe weather hampered builders. The value of inventories, which adds to GDP, increased by a surprisingly large $110.3 billion, the Commerce Department said. Inflation as measured by the PCE price index fell at a 2% annual pace, though the core rate that excludes food and energy rose at 0.9% clip.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us...t-quarter-2015-04-29?link=MW_home_latest_news

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Severe weather! :missingte

obama-recovery1.jpg
 

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
26,039
Tokens
Stock market very high
Unemployment very high
GDP very low
Bubble growing

Good luck w your portfolios. Might be time to hit up some bonds.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,141
Tokens
rut ruh, I be a guessing it bees Congress at fault again

Any good news, the least prepared man in the room thumps his chest. Any bad news, the lazy loser points fingers.

I'd say his whole persona is akin to dust in the wind, but dust in the wind has much more stability

he's just the epitome of a clusterfuck

he makes libtards look smart
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
It's too bad we can't get one of dem big spending Keynesian Republicans in office. This economy would be booming!!!

slowest-spending.png
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,891
Tokens
It's too bad we can't get one of dem big spending Keynesian Republicans in office. This economy would be booming!!!

what is so funny is that when this was allegedly the "best economy in 15 years" you didn't make any obstruct and blame comments.

Oh, and Obama is a bigger spender than Clinton, Reagan, or Bush.

ReaganvObamaREALspendingyr1-3.png



052312spending2.jpg



052412obamaspending.jpg


I guess what the 20+ million jobs created under Clinton needed was more government spending!

You literally know nothing about economics and are a laughable liar.

Oh and that stupid chart you keep posting was rated as misleading by the Washington Post. This has been pointed out to you a dozen times yet you keep posting it.

Idiot.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Uh oh, Ace is going back to his simple division dilemma, lmao!! This kid has no shame.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Uh, oh, you're a dumb fuck liar out of his depth.

LMAO!

Huh, coming from the guy who doesn't understand what "as % of GDP" means, doesn't understand what liquidate means, is an all star lawyer from a top 10 law school but thinks policies have to be written down, someone who doesn't understand what "sold" means, and someone who has problems with what "very likely" means... hahaha. You are no match whatsoever for me man. You're on Dave/Russ/Joe level here.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,891
Tokens
Huh, coming from the guy who doesn't understand what "as % of GDP" means

The best was when you thought it responsive to Obama's spending on the matter to say "what if GDP goes down"

That is how fucking dumb you are.

Of course when asked how % of GDP is calculated you could not respond. You literally have no idea.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
The best was when you thought it responsive to Obama's spending on the matter to say "what if GDP goes down"

That is how fucking dumb you are.

Of course when asked how % of GDP is calculated you could not respond. You literally have no idea.

You still don't understand why I say that, lmao!!! Just classic comedy, you never fail to disappoint. By the way I was asking that question mocking you, wasn't serious at all.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,891
Tokens
You still don't understand why I say that, lmao!!! .

The fact that you think it responsive is hysterical. You do not have any command of this topic at all.

But this is all a sideshow to the fact that you keep making up shit about Obama being some sort of modest spender. That is a complete & utter lie.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
The fact that you think it responsive is hysterical. You do not have any command of this topic at all.

But this is all a sideshow to the fact that you keep making up shit about Obama being some sort of modest spender. That is a complete & utter lie.

The fact you still don't understand why I ask that mocking you is the best part of the entire topic, lmao!! You still don't get it... it's hilarious. Wish Wabash was here to see this to get some good ole memories back of your simple division problems.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,891
Tokens
The fact you still don't understand why I ask that mocking you is the best part of the entire topic, lmao!! You still don't get it... it's hilarious.

Just think, Obama is a bigger spender than Reagan, Clinton, or Bush and you've posted the exact opposite of that.

The fact that you would even type "what if GDP goes down" as a response to federal spending as a % of GDP is just surreal. I mean, you have absolutely no, zero, understanding of economics. Just embarrassing.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Just think, Obama is a bigger spender than Reagan, Clinton, or Bush and you've posted the exact opposite of that.

The fact that you would even type "what if GDP goes down" as a response to federal spending as a % of GDP is just surreal. I mean, you have absolutely no, zero, understanding of economics. Just embarrassing.

The fact you still don't understand why I ask that question is absolutely hilarious. Like, I'm honestly laughing out loud right now. You still don't get it. Not surprised, based on how much trouble you have with simple concepts, but it is hilarious nonetheless. Proceed ace....
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
The fact you still don't understand why I ask that question is absolutely hilarious. Like, I'm honestly laughing out loud right now. You still don't get it. Not surprised, based on how much trouble you have with simple concepts, but it is hilarious nonetheless. Proceed ace....
Acebb is the forum whack-a-mole....guy pops his head up, gets hit with a sledgehammer and keeps coming back. You would think he would hide his head in shame by now

" except I didn't say that "
" except you can't point to any lie"
" vit posted in poly forum fact"

i mean how many times must this guy make an idiot out of himself.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,891
Tokens
The fact you still don't understand why I ask that question is absolutely hilarious.

I know exactly why. I said it at the time and I'm saying it now.

You can stop repeating stupid lies now.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Acebb is the forum whack-a-mole....guy pops his head up, gets hit with a sledgehammer and keeps coming back. You would think he would hide his head in shame by now

" except I didn't say that "
" except you can't point to any lie"
" vit posted in poly forum fact"

i mean how many times must this guy make an idiot out of himself.

The funny thing is, he's so mentally retarded and stubborn, that he sticks to his same lies forever. No matter what, he will lie about you posting in the Poly for the rest of his life. He will always say that mutual funds can't be liquidated or that policies have to be written down. No matter how much evidence or facts is brought his way. He's truly a nut case.

This whole thing about why I kept asking him "what if GDP goes down" is hilarious. The fact he brought that back up himself just boggles my mind, hahaha. He doesn't realize how stupid he is.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
I know exactly why. I said it at the time and I'm saying it now.

You can stop repeating stupid lies now.

No you didn't say it at the time, you had no clue why I was asking it and you kept repeating the same stupid shit over and over. It was quite humorous. I wasn't the only one laughing at your expense. I still don't think you actually get it since the way you brought it up makes it seem like you don't.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,857
Messages
13,574,114
Members
100,876
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com