ECC's 2H PLAYS 4:00 thread

[ECC]

4:00
Sea vs Ari -3
Stl @ SF -6.5
SD @ Pitt -4
Jax vs Ten -3

1:00 Results
MIAMI -4.5= loss
GIANTS -3= Push
HOUSTON +6.5=loss
CINCINNATI +7 (pending)
CAROLINA -7=loss
MINNESOTA +3=loss
GREEN BAY PK=WINNER!!

Thursday 1-0
NE WINNER!1

 

[ECC]

1:00 Results 1-4
MIAMI -4.5= loss
GIANTS -3= Push
HOUSTON +6.5=loss
CINCINNATI +7=push
CAROLINA -7=loss
MINNESOTA +3=loss
GREEN BAY PK=WINNER!!

Thursday 1-0
NE WINNER!!

This week 2-4

 

[MonsterBuck]

Rough start...looks like if SEA doesnt make a TD, AZ is going to be a play

 

[tbonestk]

2hf lines:
AZ/SEA -0.5 / 23

 

[peteg]

bookmaker has 2/23 getting a no play with az opening line: -3

 

[MonsterBuck]

AZ is only a play if u have 4 as a 2H line

 

[ECC]

Arizona = no play

 

[DertyD]

I have been following ECC the past few months and love what I am seeing!

Question: I know the formula requires ARZ's HF line to be 4.5 in order for it to be a play, but does that make sense?

Play ARZ at -4.5 and not at ARZ-2.5? Sheesh?!?!

Thanks for clarification,

Derty D

 

[ECC]

san fran pk

 

[tool21]

Tis very picky. Results are proven though!!

 

[ECC]

tennessee -3.5

 

[peteg]

Double post - thanks ECC for confirming

 

[GE4511]

check tennessee...they are the favorite in the game

 

[ECC]

SAN DIEGO +3
SAN FRAN PK
TENN -3.5

GL
see you at SN GAME

 

[peteg]

SAN DIEGO +3
SAN FRAN PK
TENN -3.5

GL
see you at SN GAME

thanks, matches what i got, best of luck to us and catch up with you later...

 

[MonsterBuck]

JAX (DOG) leading by 11, middle >10 = NO PLAY?

 

[ECC]

check tennessee...they are the favorite in the game

they're down 11 add the original 3 = 14
2h is 3.5 =10.5

Its right

 

[peteg]

error

 

[tbonestk]

this is not arguing with you at all, just clarification

i thought if the underdog was winning the only possible play was the underdog?

Who gives a fvck!

You just took a shiiitttt in your own well. Yes, the Water Well.

Why do you think ECC took down the original post with the recipe? :missingte

 

[GE4511]

chill out, i was asking for clarification from ECC, if i was wrong that's fine. just a question