Drilling in Alaska

Search

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Tokens
Am starting to favor the concept. How does it work though. Does the goverment just lease the land to the oil companies? If it is government land, wouldn't the oil belong to all of us?
 

I'm still here Mo-fo's
Joined
Sep 20, 2001
Messages
8,359
Tokens
'02
Article co-penned by Woolsey

http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0329/p11s02-coop.html

Interesting that security is indeed an important issue. Primarily the economics of the project and cost of delivery; though certainly the profitability has widened their eyes.

My understanding talking to my Alaskan friends is the oil they are looking at is "heavy" crude, not really useful to remove much of our dependence.

What it does say is something all should heed and frankly we can achieve the goal thru conservation. Smaller cars, more efficient, and certaily wiser driving habits. IMO
 

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
6,676
Tokens
For national securtiy we should be drilling for oil in every corner of this country. We should be using Nuke technology and open as many as we need. We should be using corn or whatever the hell else we can to make fuel. I know I am getting a wood or pellet stove before the next winter. This is our fault we let all the damn tree huggers and oil companies do this to us. We as the people of this country need to take back control of our energy use. We does not mean the govt.



Judge did you get your bike yet?
 

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Tokens
RS, I would die of a heart attack the first time I tried to ride it up the mountain. Back to my question, how would it work? I realize the need for drilling there, but do the oil companies get a free ride?????
 

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
6,676
Tokens
Judge Wapner said:
RS, I would die of a heart attack the first time I tried to ride it up the mountain. Back to my question, how would it work? I realize the need for drilling there, but do the oil companies get a free ride?????


Well knowing how govt works they prolly would. But I say lease the land Don't give up the land to these corporations.

Cussin I think it is people's right to own a hummer. But the great thing about this country is people have the right to be dumb as hell also. BTW I would never never own a hummer knowing what I know. Take that for what it's worth.
 

This place isn't paradise... trust me.
Joined
Jan 23, 2006
Messages
6,437
Tokens
Not for "National Security" START drilling... but have the OPTION to START drilling. I think we can scare OPEC with the OPTION.

Just MO,

BDiz...
 

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
6,676
Tokens
The thing that kills me is the tree huggers and greenpeace and all the other enviremental kooks don't realize what they are doing to our country. They are helping the enemy of this country and they are helping the big oil corporations.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Tokens
Well if the oil companies pay through the nose for the drilling rights, I am for it. It just bugs me that they get the oil from government land, then stick it up our ass at the pumps.
 

I'm still here Mo-fo's
Joined
Sep 20, 2001
Messages
8,359
Tokens
Judge Wapner said:
Am starting to favor the concept. How does it work though. Does the goverment just lease the land to the oil companies? If it is government land, wouldn't the oil belong to all of us?

Judge this may shed some light....

taken from: http://www.politicalgateway.com/main/columns/read.html?col=467

"Pay attention. This is important.

Not one drop of oil that is taken out of the ground in Alaska, our forty-ninth state, is used anywhere in the other forty-nine states.

What's more, the rights to the oil don't even belong to an American company.

This isn't difficult. It is actually very simple. That is why it baffles me it is not common knowledge.

British Petroleum, a BRITISH COMPANY owns the rights to the oil under the ground in Alaska, specifically a state in the United States of America.

How did that happen?

Remember the Exxon Valdez?

Exxon sold off their rights when they lost big time when their ship's captain was drunk and the tanker ran aground and spilled the oil all over the place. Enter BP.

However, even though BP owns the oil, they aren't being the bad guy here by sending the oil somewhere other than to the lower forty-eight states. No. It is not the case.

I remember when they built the Alaskan Pipeline. Like so many other Americans I supported it because I lived through the oil embargo of the seventies and if we could use our own oil I was all for it. If a pipeline would do it I thought we should build it. It made sense to me.

But it was a scam. It was as much a scam then as it is now.

Did anyone ever ask where the Exxon Valdez was headed when it ran aground? Did anyone ever think to ask?

Was it headed for an oil refinery in Seattle, or Portland, or San Francisco, or Los Angeles, or even San Diego?

If you thought it was going to one of those cities that has the facilities to refine the oil into gasoline you would be mistaken. You would be sadly mistaken.

When the Exxon Valdez left port its destination was Yokohama, Japan.

In fact, since the pipeline first opened 99.9% of the oil has gone directly to Japan.

Think about it.

We buy oil from the Arabs and we buy oil from the British. The British, British Petroleum, send us oil from the North Sea. Our oil, our Alaskan oil, is sent to Japan.

Welcome to a global economy and the New World Order.

Drilling for oil and building the pipeline that will become necessary as a result of the drilling will not lower gasoline prices here in the United States. In fact it won't lower prices anywhere. What it will do is help stabilize prices in Japan. ..."
 

2006 People Magazine's Sexiest Handicapper Alive
Joined
Oct 29, 2005
Messages
1,201
Tokens
i'm all for drilling anywhere and everywhere, but drilling in alaska won't solve all our problems by a long shot.

if i remember correctly, there's enough recoverable oil in alaska to meet our entire oil requirement (the U.S.'s) for about 18 months...

or, more ideally, enough to provide 7.5% of our need for the next 20 years (what the plan would be)...

sure, it's better than nothing, and it would lower our oil imports by somewhere around 15-20% (i forget the exact number)...

but it's far more important to increase fuel efficiency requirements, develop hybrid technologies, etc. etc.

i couldn't care less about caribou and wildlife. i would wipe every caribou off the face of the earth if it meant we could give a big middle finger to the Middle East and never need one more drop of oil from them...

but drilling in alaska isn't going to save us. not even close.
 

Living...vicariously through myself.
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
8,456
Tokens
Cuss I do not believe BP owns the ANWR oil.They have vast oil holdings in Alaska but ANWR is not owned by them.If tapped wed be the beneficiaries.Also we do not buy the bulk of our oil from Arabs.Mexico and Canada are out no. 1 and 2 suppliers.
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Tokens
<TABLE class=tborder id=post2819781 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=thead style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal">04-27-2006, 04:33 PM <!-- / status icon and date --></TD><TD class=thead style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal" align=right> #1 </TD></TR><TR vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 width=175>Judge Wapner<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_2819781", true); </SCRIPT>
RX Local



Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,130


</TD><TD class=alt1 id=td_post_2819781><!-- icon and title -->
icon1.gif
Drilling in Alaska
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

I ASSUMED THE GOOD JUDGE HAD WROTE A NEW NOVEL ....
 

I'm still here Mo-fo's
Joined
Sep 20, 2001
Messages
8,359
Tokens
BASEHEAD said:
Cuss I do not believe BP owns the ANWR oil.They have vast oil holdings in Alaska but ANWR is not owned by them.If tapped wed be the beneficiaries.Also we do not buy the bulk of our oil from Arabs.Mexico and Canada are out no. 1 and 2 suppliers.

You 100% positive about that? Frankly I really don't know. Of course I knew our neighbors are our top suppliers. But is what the fellow (he's a Hannity fan too) suggests really that innacurate?
 

919

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
9,360
Tokens
TheRightSide said:
The thing that kills me is the tree huggers and greenpeace and all the other enviremental kooks don't realize what they are doing to our country. They are helping the enemy of this country and they are helping the big oil corporations.

Yeah, damn tree huggin fruits always trying to protect the environment and stuff...who wants clean air and water and to preserve the natural habitat for animals and stuff...bunch of hokey pokey...
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
One way of brining the price of gas down would be to cut taxes... it cost 63 cents on the gallon in NY!!! Right now!
 

My AK-47 has killed less people than Ted Kennedy's
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
429
Tokens
Doc, you and your left wing friends at PETA are worried more about the elk than you are American's wallets. Drill in ANWAR and we have the problem under control.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,126,845
Messages
13,688,493
Members
102,378
Latest member
charlotte822
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com