- Executive
- Legislative
- Judicial
- Media ( I know this isn't a real branch but people call them a pseudo branch that sets the agenda and the issues).
I was actually entertained listening to Bill Clinton on TV the other day. He is a political moderate, blue dog democrat and he was talking about voter demographics. He said that pretty much throughout our history 40% of the people will vote Democrat, 40% will vote republican, 5% Indy, and you end up fighting over the rest.
Bill clinton was a moderate, and his strategy played right into the median voter model's theory of winning an election.
Clinton also pointed out that althought we had that historical 40-40-5 mix, in the 80's it was probably more like 40% dem, 45% repub, 5% Indy, and 10% up for grabs.
NOW he says it is most likely 45% dem, 40% repub, 5% indy, and 10% up for grabs. I actually found myself agreeing with a lot of what he was saying, and if I ever had to have a democratic president, I would want a more fiscally conservative one like him ( that lowered cap gains, and divy taxes) and certainly NOT a super liberal socialist like Obama.
The point I am trying to make, is that I would think that most Americans would NOT want to be bombared by Liberals. Bush is unpopular and has a 28% approval rating, but Nancy Pelosi and her Democrat cronies in Congress have a 9% approval rating. Most people don't want the Democrats in control of EVERYTHING.
I think the republicans can use this as a strong sales pitch to Joe Public. Do you really want the Democrats in control of your entire life? What your kids see on TV, the judgements in court, the CEO of the country, and the people spending your money?
- Legislative
- Judicial
- Media ( I know this isn't a real branch but people call them a pseudo branch that sets the agenda and the issues).
I was actually entertained listening to Bill Clinton on TV the other day. He is a political moderate, blue dog democrat and he was talking about voter demographics. He said that pretty much throughout our history 40% of the people will vote Democrat, 40% will vote republican, 5% Indy, and you end up fighting over the rest.
Bill clinton was a moderate, and his strategy played right into the median voter model's theory of winning an election.
Clinton also pointed out that althought we had that historical 40-40-5 mix, in the 80's it was probably more like 40% dem, 45% repub, 5% Indy, and 10% up for grabs.
NOW he says it is most likely 45% dem, 40% repub, 5% indy, and 10% up for grabs. I actually found myself agreeing with a lot of what he was saying, and if I ever had to have a democratic president, I would want a more fiscally conservative one like him ( that lowered cap gains, and divy taxes) and certainly NOT a super liberal socialist like Obama.
The point I am trying to make, is that I would think that most Americans would NOT want to be bombared by Liberals. Bush is unpopular and has a 28% approval rating, but Nancy Pelosi and her Democrat cronies in Congress have a 9% approval rating. Most people don't want the Democrats in control of EVERYTHING.
I think the republicans can use this as a strong sales pitch to Joe Public. Do you really want the Democrats in control of your entire life? What your kids see on TV, the judgements in court, the CEO of the country, and the people spending your money?
Last edited: