Did Barack "Spread the Wealth" Obama Just Blow the Election?

Search

Banned
Joined
Nov 9, 2005
Messages
3,981
Tokens
October 16, 2008 11:37 AM ET | James Pethokoukis | Permanent Link | Print
No. Really. You're kidding me. Barack Obama actually told that Joe the Plumber guy that he wants to "spread the wealth around." What, did Obama just get done reading the Wikipedia entry on Huey "Share the Wealth" Long or something? Was he somehow channeling that left-wing populist from the Depression? Talk about playing into the most extreme stereotype of your party, that it is infested with socialists.
A while back I chatted with a University of Chicago professor who was a frequent lunch companion of Obama's. This professor said that Obama was as close to a full-out Marxist as anyone who has ever run for president of the United States. Now, I tend to quickly dismiss that kind of talk as way over the top. My working assumption is that Obama is firmly within the mainstream of Democratic politics. But if he is as free with that sort of redistributive philosophy in private as he was on the campaign trail this week, I have no doubt that U of C professor really does figure him as a radical. And after last night's debate, a few more Americans might think that way, too. McCain's best line: "Now, of all times in America, we need to cut people's taxes. We need to encourage business, create jobs, not spread the wealth around."
And by the way, I just noticed that the IBD/TIPP poll, the most accurate in 2004, has McCain down by just 3 points. If the contest is perceived by the voters as a contest between a wealth redistributor and a wealth creator, then it could be a long night come Nov. 4. This is still a center-right country, gang. Note this Gallup poll from June:
When given a choice about how government should address the numerous economic difficulties facing today's consumer, Americans overwhelmingly—by 84% to 13%—prefer that the government focus on improving overall economic conditions and the jobs situation in the United States as opposed to taking steps to distribute wealth more evenly among Americans.
There you go.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,447
Tokens
You keep insisting that every thing that happens is going to spring McCain into the lead meanwhile the poilling data clearly shows that Obama holds a 6-8 point lead if you average all of the polls:

Polling Data

<table class="data"><tbody><tr><th class="noCenter">Poll</th><th class="date">Date</th><th>Sample</th><th>Obama (D)</th><th>McCain (R)</th><th class="spread">Spread</th></tr><tr class="rcpAvg"><td class="noCenter">RCP Average</td><td>10/09 - 10/16</td><td>--</td><td>49.5</td><td>42.6</td><td class="spread">Obama +6.9</td></tr><tr class="alt"><td class="noCenter">Rasmussen Tracking</td><td>10/14 - 10/16</td><td>3000 LV</td><td>50</td><td>46</td><td class="spread">Obama +4</td></tr><tr><td class="noCenter">Reuters/C-Span/Zogby Tracking</td><td>10/14 - 10/16</td><td>1210 LV</td><td>49</td><td>44</td><td class="spread">Obama +5</td></tr><tr class="alt"><td class="noCenter">Hotline/FD Tracking</td><td>10/14 - 10/16</td><td>804 LV</td><td>50</td><td>40</td><td class="spread">Obama +10</td></tr><tr><td class="noCenter">Gallup Tracking (Traditional)*</td><td>10/14 - 10/16</td><td>2155 LV</td><td>49</td><td>47</td><td class="spread">Obama +2</td></tr><tr class="alt"><td class="noCenter">Gallup Tracking (Expanded)*</td><td>10/14 - 10/16</td><td>2314 LV</td><td>51</td><td>45</td><td class="spread">Obama +6</td></tr><tr><td class="noCenter">GW/Battleground Tracking</td><td>10/12 - 10/16</td><td>800 LV</td><td>49</td><td>45</td><td class="spread">Obama +4</td></tr><tr class="alt"><td class="noCenter">IBD/TIPP Tracking</td><td>10/12 - 10/16</td><td>1020 LV</td><td>46</td><td>41</td><td class="spread">Obama +5</td></tr><tr><td class="noCenter">LA Times/Bloomberg</td><td>10/10 - 10/13</td><td>1030 LV</td><td>50</td><td>41</td><td class="spread">Obama +9</td></tr><tr class="alt"><td class="noCenter">CBS News/NY Times</td><td>10/10 - 10/13</td><td>699 LV</td><td>53</td><td>39</td><td class="spread">Obama +14</td></tr><tr><td class="noCenter">USA Today/Gallup (Traditional)*</td><td>10/10 - 10/12</td><td>761 LV</td><td>50</td><td>46</td><td class="spread">Obama +4</td></tr><tr class="alt"><td class="noCenter">USA Today/Gallup (Expanded)*</td><td>10/10 - 10/12</td><td>1030 LV</td><td>52</td><td>45</td><td class="spread">Obama +7</td></tr><tr><td class="noCenter">Pew Research</td><td>10/09 - 10/12</td><td>1191 LV</td><td>49</td><td>42</td><td class="spread">Obama +7</td></tr><tr class="alt"><td class="noCenter">Ipsos/McClatchy</td><td>10/09 - 10/13</td><td>1036 RV</td><td>48</td><td>39</td><td class="spread">Obama +9</td></tr></tbody></table>
 

L5Y, USC is 4-0 vs SEC, outscoring them 167-48!!!
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
7,025
Tokens
because the righty's only pay attention to 1 poll leans in their favor. YOu know, kinda like Fox News polls saying McCain won every debate 99% - 1%?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,447
Tokens
because the righty's only pay attention to 1 poll leans in their favor. YOu know, kinda like Fox News polls saying McCain won every debate 99% - 1%?

wait, you mean those fox news polls aren't scientific?
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
8,891
Tokens
Simple answer for simple-minded blogwhores:

Nope

The Blogs that completely destroyed the CBS news lie machine? :103631605

103730.jpg
 

I'm still here Mo-fo's
Joined
Sep 20, 2001
Messages
8,359
Tokens
Dude you are so far gone, even the majority of your own poly repugs think you're a stooge.

Fuck get on to Stage 3 already.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,870
Messages
13,574,439
Members
100,879
Latest member
am_sports
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com