denver under

[hansenbros.]

who posted the denver under second half deal???
was it just a last year deal or is there a larger sampling???

thank you.

i will be posting nba again this year, was at 58% in '00 and '01 and about 53% in '02 shootin for 60% this year.

gl

 

[SINGURU]

IT'S GOOD TO SEE YOU BACK

 

[MrKennedy]

Can't imagine that trend should apply to this year (denver under 2nd half at home)

New Players... a REAL PG in Miller and probably some decent scoring from Mello

 

[BZ]

hansen,
Denver UNDER 2nd half was 27-12-1 last year.
Previous two years it was 63-19-2.

Good luck this year.

 

[DENIRO]

who are the new "denver nugets" this year

atl?
utah?

 

[UT-Longhorn]

Here are the official stats on the 2nd half Denver Unders, and I will continue to pound them until I see otherwise.......

Unbelievable NBA Trend - (91-31-3 last 3 years) - 74.5%

Unbelievable NBA Trend - (91-31-3 last 3 years)
Play UNDER Denver 2nd half when at Home
2000-2000 31 wins 10 losses 1 push
2001-2002 32 wins 9 losses 1 push
2002-2003 28 wins 12 losses 1 push (End of Regular Season 2003)

good luck

 

[SHACK]

I'm with you. Play that baby till she wont play no more.

 

[srbunny]

if its works bet it until nba half or all-star game. i was wondering what teams at denver went over the total in 2nd half of games that lost??? maybe don`t bet thoses games, does not affect them or did they not travel so far to get to denver??? lets get`em denny

 

[qs185]

Did Denver miss some home games last season? I thought that teams would have 42 home games, but I see 1 post with 40 games in it for last season, and another post with 41 games in it for last season.

Also wondering if anyone else is concerned that Denver looks to be much improved this season, which would affect this trend.

Thanks and good luck,
Bart

 

[MadCapper]

41 home games.

-MC

 

[qs185]

Mad, you're right, my bad. I was thrown off by the quoted records of 2000-2001 and 2002-2003 having 42 games in them, and, without thinking, just said, "why does last year have 41, they must have missed one". I should have just taken a moment to look it up (or realize there are 82 games, so 41 should be at home).

Did they play an extra home game in 2000-2001 and 2001-2002?

Thanks,
Bart

 

[joeybagadonuts]

FYI
The players have less to do with the trend than does the altitude. It's very hard to adjust to the thin air as evidenced by the low scoring 2nd halves regardless of whom Denver is playing...

 

[qs185]

I would like to think that altitude has something to do with it, but why do no other high-altitude environments exhibit this trend? Also, I had someone check in college (since there are more high-altitude arensa), and if anything, the second halfs in high-altitude arenas are higher-scoring in college.

Also, just checked, and there were only 41 home games (as expected) in each of the 2000-2001, 2001-2002, and 2002-2003 seasons, so the overall count is high by 2 games.

Good Luck,
Bart

 

[joeybagadonuts]

Bart
Check Utah's 2nd halves, scoring tends to drop there too...

 

[silver7]

Well maybe it`s because no other team is close to Denver`s elevation, except SLC and they`re 1000 ft less. Who were you thinking of New Orleans?

 

[GreenDoberman]

Denver will be running and gunnning this year, and the team is completely made over from last year.
Expect them to push the ball up, I watched their training camp documentary several times on NBA TV, and they will be doing a 360 from last year's scroing average.
The value will be in the over early.

 

[BZ]

Guys,
It doesn't matter who is on the team and who they are playing. The trend is proven over the last three years. More importantly is to monitor each game and determine value by what the the differnece may be from the original opening line.

 

[qs185]

GreenDoberman,

I agree that the team will be more of a run and gun. Don't know if the value will be in the over, am taking a wait-and-see attitude.


joey,

Utah's second halves (the only other NBA team I considered as "high altitude, and I realize it's not that close - and no, Silver, I didn't consider New Orleans

) do drop, but not by anywhere near as much as Denver. I should say I don't think they do, since I am not looking at my data at the moment and need to check to be certain, but know I looked at them last year and don't recall that betting the second half under in Utah games would have been worthwhile.


BZ,

While I do think it matters to some extent who is on the team, I agree with the "monitor each game and determine value by what the the differnece may be from the original opening line." statement.

Good Luck,
Bart

 

[PatrickMcIrish]

I was wondering if anyone remembered this year! LOL. I am on top of it as always....