Dal/Sac greatest refs EVER!!!!!

[Mr NJ Sports]

Thank you for not calling a foul at the end !!!!!

 

[smokey]

I totally agree with you, that was bs.

 

[TheEddieBelfourcaster]

i watched it without wager . . . those were fouls.
i've seen them call way less way too many times for them to not call those repeated hacks.

 

[islandboy]

total bs

 

[Horseshoe]

Those were makeups for securing Sacto as the outright with a few bogus calls minutes earlier(and throughout), because we know that refs don't bet, nor does Stern..it surely wasn't to keep it in the hat.

 

[dolphin]

glad to see those posts this AM...I'm pretty objective...I know when I've gotten breaks and don't whine on normal "bad luck" such as meaningless buzzer 3's...but that seemed clear. The league doesn't like that either. They don't talk about it publicly, but they know how big betting on the sport is for their tv fan base especially, and they don't want a hint of the taint from the 50's and 60's. Besides, if a foul had been called immediately, Dallas still had perhaps a 1-in-10,000 shot of winning the game...hardly anything, but enough for even Cuban to have a complaint. I'm surprised they ddn't draw blood on Brad Miller.

All immaterial if Peja was shooting normally even for just the second half.