Conference Finals Pick

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,595
Tokens
Total Playoff Record: 9-3 (75%)+14.4 units
4 units plays: 1-0 + 4.0 units
3 unit plays: 1-0 + 3.0 units
2 unit plays: 6-2 +7.5 units
1 unit plays: 1-1 - 0.1

NE ML -158 3 units (-158)

To be clear that is to win 3 units so I am risking 4.74 units to win 3.

The other option was -2.5 (-140) or -3 (-115 or so) but I think this is the best option. I may play the total but I have to stud it.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
2,009
Tokens
I'm with you. Going with the points and adding ML play(s) to my original bets to cover my main bets. I think both combining -3 + ML and straight ML plays will be very effective here given a) playoffs b) match-up history. Also, taking the points now looks to be favorable as well for Pats backers based on my ratings. I try my hardest to be unbiased when I pick one of my favorite teams at look at it from an objective point of view. I really try to look for spots to bet against them - this isn't one of them. I have this line ranging anywhere from 4 to 5 Patriots so I see value in taking the points as well as obvious ML plays.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,595
Tokens
Add 4 more units & make them a 7 unit, lol......gl man!

I am tempted. I try to stay within a 1 through 4 unit system as a way to manage my bankroll, although with only 3 games left sometimes I will cheat a bit toward the end. Last year I bet 5 units on the SB (won) two units on the FH UNDER (lost in painful fashion) and added some props.

But as a general rule, 4 units is my max bet and pretty rare. 2 units is probably my most typical bet. 1 unit is usually what I bet if I bet on a natonally televised game for fun, but don't have a strong conviction (which is probably why I always have the worst record on 1 unit plays) And 3 units is almost as rare as the 4 unit play.

But with 3 games left, there is only so much gambling that can be done. I would consider adding something on the FH or a TT of some sort. Denver will probably have a TT of 21, which seems low. But Brady has more TD passes (3) in Denver this season than Manning (1).
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,595
Tokens
I'm with you. Going with the points and adding ML play(s) to my original bets to cover my main bets. I think both combining -3 + ML and straight ML plays will be very effective here given a) playoffs b) match-up history. Also, taking the points now looks to be favorable as well for Pats backers based on my ratings. I try my hardest to be unbiased when I pick one of my favorite teams at look at it from an objective point of view. I really try to look for spots to bet against them - this isn't one of them. I have this line ranging anywhere from 4 to 5 Patriots so I see value in taking the points as well as obvious ML plays.

Yeah, I am a Pats fan too, so I try to be objective. To be honest, I was susprised by this line at first -- if you had asked me what the line would be in a hypothetical matchup on Saturday morning I would''ve guessed a PK or maybe even Denver -1. But these are unusual circumstances -- we had no idea if the Pat's team was mailing it in the last two weeks and if they would return to dominance when healthy.

They looked amazing and the O-line only allowed 1 hit on Brady. So all of a sudden it feels close to the Pats of week 1-10. meanwhile the Broncos look like they still don't have a QB. The PAt's really should've won in Denver this year -- they went to OT after a bunch of shady calls -- and that was without almost Lewis, Edelman and Amendola, (and probably o-line and defensive players who I can't recall).

But my bet is totally on Xs and Os and has nothing to do with consensus or sharp/square stuff -- this is a straight up prediction that Brady will beat Manning.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,595
Tokens
I am adding 1 unit to the NE ML at -160 which makes the total bet 6.34 units to win 4. The first 3 units are at -158 so totaled it is like I am betting the ML at -185.3 (or -185.25 but how many decimal points do we need to use

Amended

Pats ML (-158.3) 4 units

I am shopping for a good FH TT OVER for Carolina, but I don't like what I see for. I can get 10.5 with heavy juice (-130) or 13.5 at (+100). I wish I could find something like a 12 at -110.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,595
Tokens
Total Playoff Record: 9-3 (75%)+14.4 units
4 units plays: 1-0 + 4.0 units
3 unit plays: 1-0 + 3.0 units
2 unit plays: 6-2 +7.5 units
1 unit plays: 1-1 - 0.1
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,595
Tokens
Add

Carolina First Half Team Total OVER 11 (-115) 1 unit

I like this much better than what some other books are offering (such as OVER 10.5 at -130 or OVER 13.5 at +100).

So my card for the day (not including any 2nd half plays) is:

NE Moneyline -158 - 6.3 to win 4 units
Panther FH OVER 11 - 1.15 units to win 1 unit
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,595
Tokens
Wow, late line move has the NE ML at -145. The FH mL is -125.

Add

Patriots FH +.5 (-140) 1 unit
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,595
Tokens
I figure, laying -125 for the ML vs laying -140 for +.5 is worth the juice (available at 5 Dimes). This way a half-time tie is a win for me.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,908
Messages
13,575,089
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com