Cappthespread Wednesday

[Cappthespread.com]

We have some good plays for today. Here is today's Bonus Play:

Charleston (-6.5) @ Wofford

- Charleston has won 9 of last 10 in this series,
average of victory throughout those games 7.9 pts/game
- Wofford’s 1-6 in their last seven, only win was at
Citadel. Wofford has only one win vs. a team rated
lower than 200 RPI, which was Davidson at home,
Davidson is RPI #159, Charleston is rated RPI # 85.

This type of games would seem to be a breakout game
for Charleston who has been struggling as of late.
Wofford is a terrible team and has already lost to the
cougars earlier this season by 20. All three of the
leagues top teams have trounced this team for an
average victory of 17 pts/game. Only one of those
games was played at home but the picture is still
pretty clear, Wofford doesn’t match up well against
good teams.

We have 3 other strong plays for today.

 

[Cappthespread.com]

Ton of people on this one, that scares me, still the analysis is good.

 

[MAKE$$$$]

CAP
WROTE YOU BACK LAST NIGHT

 

[Cappthespread.com]

Yes thanks Make, still doing some brain storming

 

[Kojak]

Best of luck with your Charleston pick as I will definitely take a closer look at the game after reading your analysis. Keep up the great work.

 

[WINNINGHAND]

Certifiably Crazy
posted February 11, 2004 05:19 PM
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Cappthespread:
WHOA! that's alot of plays, you can't possibly be profitable with that many plays. Did you hit say you have been hitting about 50% this year? I am guessing with an small average of say 7 games a day @ 100 dollars a day you are giving 9 dollars in juice *7 plays a day * about 65 days = 4095 dollars in juice over the course of the season!! that's a conservative estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


If he plays everything at 105 outs like pinnacle and iis, you are dead wrong. Also, the best gambler in the world bets more games than that. His name is billy walters. God it must hurt to show the whole world your ignorance.

 

[WINNINGHAND]

 

[Cappthespread.com]

Yeah you sure showed me wrong, man maybe I should get on my knees and kiss you feet, get the **** out of my thread bitch, nobody knows who this damn billy walters, when you play 7 games a day for a full month documenting them in this forum then I might believe you but your still not going to make the same bank as I do playing only a few top plays a day, so get the **** out

 

[WINNINGHAND]

Lets see, I have had partial ownership of a sportsbook in Costa Rica for over 3 years. I know categorically that billy walters plays so many games that it will make your head spin. I also used to move games for him. Additionally, you neglected to acknowledge the distinction between laying 105 on myriad games versus 110. Most people resort to profanity when their backs are to the wall and they can't come up with a better refutation. I feel sorry for you.

 

[Cappthespread.com]

Kojak is this one of your flunky names? What the hell is going on here? I didn't even say anything to this ****er and he came into my thread for no ****ing reason

 

[WINNINGHAND]

This guy Kojak couldn't tell you the difference between billy walters and michael jackson. I also guarantee that a guy like him knows nothing of the importance of laying 105 versus 110. I merely saw that you made two statements that were 180 degrees from the truth on his thread, and i wanted it pointed out that you were 1000% wrong. I am not saying that you lack prowess as a capper, but when you make bold statements in a public forum, you should be intelligent enough to come up with stats that reflect laying 110 versus 105, which a lot of people are now laying. As far as whether he can win with that many games, you are probably right, he will lose in the long run playing that many games. However, it is not that smartest thing in the world to make statements that NOBODY can win playing that many games because you are dead wrong. If it upsets you so much to have someone here with an IQ that eclipses 100 who is pointing out inacurracies in your statements, i am sorry. when I say something stupid, and i say plenty of stupid things myself, i am man enough to take my criticisms like a man. You obviously do not. A Kojak ghost, I don't think so. Feel free to look at my past posts, and like all smart people here, you should conclude that I have nothing to do with him.

 

[Cappthespread.com]

Whatever, look dumb ass, even if it's only 105 juice we are still talking about over 2000 dollars which was my point. This doesn't conflict with anything I have ever said before and it's right. You still have to win 51% or more and doing that over the course of a full year is next to impossible, bitch.

 

[Kojak]

cappthespread,

No, Winninghand and Kojak is not the same person. But what I did want to point out to you is that I went 12-3-1 tonight for (80%). I am not trying to rub it in your face but I just wanted to point out how some nights have more games worth betting than others. Best of luck on your future bets as I do value your opinion.