Bushco is planning the next 9-11

[mjaytee]

Okay, I firmly believe that 9-11 was an inside job. There is no changing my mind so dismiss the insults. Although, I have to admit I have conservatively changed the minds of at least a dozen people in my circle and I am in Republican circles. Heck, I started a cushy Homeland Security subcontracting gig today thanks to my Republican connections. I'm just not a party first, neocon Republican.

The only reason I post that on here is because people disagree with me. I frequent a couple of boards where everyone believes as I do and it can get pretty boring sometimes.

All that being said it appears according to the American Conservative magazine Bushco is planning to release another 9-11 in order to attack Iran with no proof whatsoever below is an excerpt from the article:

The question is how is it that they are already planning to attack Iran no matter what? Another inside job in the making?

According to Philip Giraldi, writing in the new issue of the American Conservative, it's to nuke Iran:

The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President Dick Cheney's office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States. The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons. Within Iran there are more than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option. As in the case of Iraq, the response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of terrorism directed against the United States. Several senior Air Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the implications of what they are doing--that Iran is being set up for an unprovoked nuclear attack--but no one is prepared to damage his career by posing any objections.​

​

​

 

[docmercer--banned]

Sad part is the large number of Bushies on this board that would scream for joy if millions of innocent Iraqis lost their lives ....

You are intelligent and have working brain substance ... that puts you 2 up on the Bushies and 9-11 was just like 11-22

 

[docmercer--banned]

On Feb. 22, 2002, John Bolton, a leading Administration chickenhawk, who runs the arms control and disarmament office at the State Department, gave an interview to the Washington Times, in which he boasted about the Bush Administration's intent to use nuclear weapons, under certain circumstances. He candidly told the Times that the world had changed so dramatically on Sept. 11, 2001, that it was no longer unthinkable to use nuclear arms against rogue states thought to possess weapons of mass destruction.

On Sept. 14, 2002, President Bush signed a secret document, National Security Presidential Directive 17, which stated, in part: "The United States will continue to make clear that it reserves the right to respond with overwhelming force—including potentially nuclear weapons—to the use of [weapons of mass destruction] against the United States, our forces abroad, and friends and allies."

In 1992, when Cheney and his cohorts attempted to include the idea of preventive war, and the offensive use of mini-nukes in their draft Defense Planning Guidance, the proposal was vetoed by President George Bush Sr., at the urging of his top national security aides, General Brent Scowcroft and James Baker III.

 

[Holysmoke+]

do you guys watch Fahrenheit 911 every night on DVD and scream at the mirror afterwards?

 

[docmercer--banned]

Bush sacrificed 3000 Americans before so another 3-5k to let him and Cheney drop Nukes is not out of the question with this pack of lunatic, Neo-Cons ....

 

[nimue77]

Unless they say that Iran was behind or aiding in the attack or harboring the so-called attackers than they would not have good enough cause to get enough support IMO. It is not like Iraq where Saddam Hussein was already known as the big boogy man who slaughtered his own people to mainstream america. I do agree about the inside job part, have for years.

 

[BASEHEAD]

9-11...An inside job?? You all are clueless.And to praise someones intelligence in response to such a comment is even worse.So was everyone including Clinton involved? I mean his weak stance on terror (although Dems will say he was tough on the animals) led directly to the abortion, otherwise known as airport security during the late 90's.How about the finances of such people being able to move funds and information for years before Bush took office.Or were the lazy bitches that searched the terrorist bags and failed to detect the weapons that fateful day part of the plan? All just to remove Hussein,right? To finish his fathers war right? Get real people. His father finished the first war as the point of Iraq I was to get Hussein out of Kuwait...objective completed.


Are you guys what people refer to as radical? Or propagandists? Just plain Bush haters...

 

[mjaytee]

do you guys watch Fahrenheit 911 every night on DVD and scream at the mirror afterwards?

Fahrenheit 9/11 is a f#$%ing joke. It was good for some Bush bashers and it exposed some lies but all in all it was lacking. I'm interested in America saving not Bush bashing although Bush deserves bashing.

 

[mjaytee]

9-11...An inside job??

Just look at who has benefitted from 9-11. Without 9-11 Bush would have been bumbling one-term idiot. All of Bush buddies have made Billions on this war. I'm about to make $50k over at least the next year because of 9-11, so I put myself in the profiteering group as well. Personally, I think my boss may be cheating me because she will not tell me what she is making. I'm just taking a bit of her workload so she can spend more time with her family, so she says.

So all this war profiteering was started by a mythical figure hiding in a cave and 19 incompetents (according to the "official" story) with box cutters? Yea, right.

 

[Redneckman]

This has got to be the most wacked out thread I've ever seen on here. And you clowns wonder why 5% of the population take you seriously.

 

[docmercer--banned]

and the Masses also followed Hitler in the late 1930's

 

[eek.]

but Hitler was a great leader, he made his country strong.

hang on a minute...

 

[Redneckman]

Is that all you have, Hitler and gays? What do have against gays anyway. You're the party who's supposed to be all inclusive I thought. Sounds like you're the homophobe.

 

[docmercer--banned]

Your party is the Party of "Morals" and everywhere ya turn are fudge packers named Rove, Mehlmann, McClellan, Jeff Gannon & Mary Cheney ....

Is there anyone straight in this administration? And dont say Right Wing cause he keeps bragging that "Redneckman sure has a 'Purty Mouth'

 

[Redneckman]

Shhh! Not sure why you keep advertising the fact that you're a homophobe. Only republicans are homophobes.

 

[BASEHEAD]

"Without 9-11 Bush would have been bumbling one-term idiot."

Another ingenious statement. 9-11 and the subsequent fallout has done nothing but hurt Bush.In the very early stages of Afghanistan there was a rise in popularity but that steadliy declined in the face of the liberal media relentless bashing.The fact Bush made a strong statement to terrorists in retalition stayed with people,even though their confidence in GWB had eroded somewhat.This is why JFKerry lost.When presented with a pseudo-war hero/billionaire/flip-flopper the public decided a "more sensitive" war on terror was not the answer.And unfortunately Kerry had no other answers either.See its not that Bush won it, its that Kerry lost it.Big difference....Thanks be to the Lord.

 

[Redneckman]

Accurate post. Problem is it will fly right over the left wing wackos' heads. You see, Bush is gay. He also planned 9/11. That Rove is sure a crook. Then there's that Dumbsfeld guy. You know, that Bush, he's just like Hitler! etc. etc. etc. ad nauseum.

 

[eek.]

Several senior Air Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the implications of what they are doing--that Iran is being set up for an unprovoked nuclear attack--but no one is prepared to damage his career by posing any objections.

So Bush is planning a tactical nuclear strike....
....but no-one wants to damage his career by going public

Coldweather will be chuffed.
Get yourself a couple of carrierbags son and be ready to take their stuff.

 

[mjaytee]

9-11 and the subsequent fallout has done nothing but hurt Bush

I would beg to differ. All Bush has is 9-11, 9-11, 9-11, terrorists, 9-11, terrorist, 9-11, 9-11, terrorists. Even Bush himself would admit that 9-11 is all he has going for him in America. He has all the "good Germans" in the palm of his hand as the posts defending him indicate.

 

[JDeuce]

Can't help but to love the logic of the Left:

One minute, Bush is a bumbling chimp who couldn't be counted on to tie his own shoes.

The next...he's an insidious, Lex Luthor-like mastermind who has the genius capability to coordinate something of this grand magnitude for his own benefit.

Whats the story du jour, ladies?