blue marlin owes 500,000 and and went under noone of the other costa rican books seem to care when if they all pitched it to save their reputations and collectively bailed out the players it would cost them almost nothing. Jay cohen said it well i hope you guys all have a chair when the music stops because im outa there. come on costa rica step up to the plate here
Some say that well respected hang out with the rogue operators and party together.
I ask for solid books to put notice on their websites about the practices of books like BML, ESB, & Theonlinebet, etc...
But, no one even replies to the suggestion.
There are good books there I believe but the market is set up nicely for scammers.
I ask for solid books to put notice on their websites about the practices of books like BML, ESB, & Theonlinebet, etc...
But, no one even replies to the suggestion.
There are good books there I believe but the market is set up nicely for scammers.
im a moron flopber just because i speak up about the big game going on down there, i'm trying to come up with a way to save the good books because at this point who the hell in their right mind would want any money in any book down their if football season keeps going the way they say its going.....what info do we have about hollywood that says its different than blue marlin really people wake up..... however if people believed that when a forum advertised book goes others would come to the rescue i think alot of the flight away from these books would stop
Agreed, books everywhere are hurt because frankly few people know exactly where the books are as it is. Not to mention how impossible it would be if a consortium of books came in, these guys can't agree on anything in how to operate, how could you get them all to agree on how to run a book they invested in??? Some would say cut the bonuses, others would say bonus out of their ears. Some would say no wiseguys, others would say take every nickel of action you can find. It just won't happen, books have to be taken over by one book or one like-minded group of investors with a clear leader calling the shots.
Wildbill, let's review for one second what a CONSORTIUM is:
con·sor·ti·um( P ) (kn-sôrt-m, -sh-m)n. pl. con·sor·ti·a (-t-, -sh-)
<LI>An association or a combination, as of businesses, financial institutions, or investors, for the purpose of engaging in a joint venture.
<LI>A cooperative arrangement among groups or institutions: a library consortium.
<LI>An association or society.
The way I understand a CONSORTIUM seems to difer with your conception.
Books don't have to agree 100% in the way they run their operation to form a consortium. They simply would have to look for a neutral legitimate 3rd party, such as an accounting reknown firma, and have them hold the proofs of audit run on each of the books. As long as they're financially solvent and as long as they keep any post-up monies in escrow, this accounting firma would be in the position to determine which book has the assets to cover its liabilities.
Once this consortium has been formed, it would simply be a matter of having any new shop -willing to be part of it- submit its financial reports, not to the other shops in the consortium, but to the accounting firma, hired to do so.
It's very simple. The biggest issue seems to be the TRUST to be developed amongst the initial members of this society. But that is not impossible to work out and it has come a time where a solution like this could be very viable.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Some would say cut the bonuses, others would say bonus out of their ears. Some would say no wiseguys, others would say take every nickel of action you can find<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I do not know of one solid book that wouldn't agree to drop the bonuses. Actually, they would be very happy to see something like this happening. Wise guys? Bookig steam or not?
Man, that has nothing to do with this. It all boils down to be financially solid and being able to prove it. As long as they got the bankroll to back any action they choose to book, it all should be good.
Besides, it would put a limit to movers and bonus whores. THAT would be fun.
con·sor·ti·um( P ) (kn-sôrt-m, -sh-m)n. pl. con·sor·ti·a (-t-, -sh-)
<LI>An association or a combination, as of businesses, financial institutions, or investors, for the purpose of engaging in a joint venture.
<LI>A cooperative arrangement among groups or institutions: a library consortium.
<LI>An association or society.
The way I understand a CONSORTIUM seems to difer with your conception.
Books don't have to agree 100% in the way they run their operation to form a consortium. They simply would have to look for a neutral legitimate 3rd party, such as an accounting reknown firma, and have them hold the proofs of audit run on each of the books. As long as they're financially solvent and as long as they keep any post-up monies in escrow, this accounting firma would be in the position to determine which book has the assets to cover its liabilities.
Once this consortium has been formed, it would simply be a matter of having any new shop -willing to be part of it- submit its financial reports, not to the other shops in the consortium, but to the accounting firma, hired to do so.
It's very simple. The biggest issue seems to be the TRUST to be developed amongst the initial members of this society. But that is not impossible to work out and it has come a time where a solution like this could be very viable.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Some would say cut the bonuses, others would say bonus out of their ears. Some would say no wiseguys, others would say take every nickel of action you can find<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I do not know of one solid book that wouldn't agree to drop the bonuses. Actually, they would be very happy to see something like this happening. Wise guys? Bookig steam or not?
Man, that has nothing to do with this. It all boils down to be financially solid and being able to prove it. As long as they got the bankroll to back any action they choose to book, it all should be good.
Besides, it would put a limit to movers and bonus whores. THAT would be fun.
Haha, that is funny. Yeah all it would take is a third party administrator, but that is for rational folks. Almost every big hitter at a book redefines ego and control. Imagine CRIS and NASA getting together and trying to do this, oh that is funny. They would argue over what color to make the web page and it would delay the process a month!
Make it simple have one book take it over, a book that is rational, has cash, and most of all has a backbone so they can do what is best to protect everyone's interests and not worry about the few people that come to sites complaining about not getting their money tomorrow.
Make it simple have one book take it over, a book that is rational, has cash, and most of all has a backbone so they can do what is best to protect everyone's interests and not worry about the few people that come to sites complaining about not getting their money tomorrow.
WildBill:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Haha, that is funny. Yeah all it would take is a third party administrator, but that is for rational folks. Almost every big hitter at a book redefines ego and control. Imagine CRIS and NASA getting together and trying to do this, oh that is funny. They would argue over what color to make the web page and it would delay the process a month! <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
What makes you think that any solid reputable shop would like to be associated with BoS?
As an insider I know you are, you're definitely not being "sharp" on this one. Why? Is it possible that you're missing the big picture or is it just that an idea like this wouldn't be on your best interest?
That, Wildbill, is a legitimate question.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Make it simple have one book take it over, a book that is rational, has cash, and most of all has a backbone so they can do what is best to protect everyone's interests and not worry about the few people that come to sites complaining about not getting their money tomorrow.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Consolidation will definitely be a part of the process, but by no means the ultimate solution.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Haha, that is funny. Yeah all it would take is a third party administrator, but that is for rational folks. Almost every big hitter at a book redefines ego and control. Imagine CRIS and NASA getting together and trying to do this, oh that is funny. They would argue over what color to make the web page and it would delay the process a month! <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
What makes you think that any solid reputable shop would like to be associated with BoS?
As an insider I know you are, you're definitely not being "sharp" on this one. Why? Is it possible that you're missing the big picture or is it just that an idea like this wouldn't be on your best interest?
That, Wildbill, is a legitimate question.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Make it simple have one book take it over, a book that is rational, has cash, and most of all has a backbone so they can do what is best to protect everyone's interests and not worry about the few people that come to sites complaining about not getting their money tomorrow.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Consolidation will definitely be a part of the process, but by no means the ultimate solution.
Why don't you do the smart thing and put your money in books that YOU KNOW have the founds to pay you back.
For them is still bussines, if someone wants to step up and take care of the accounts, great for those guys and we'll be here praising that book, but no one HAS to, you know that first thing people are going to do is take their money out. I don't think you would take your competitors losses just for the fun of it, or just because you're in the same state.
For them is still bussines, if someone wants to step up and take care of the accounts, great for those guys and we'll be here praising that book, but no one HAS to, you know that first thing people are going to do is take their money out. I don't think you would take your competitors losses just for the fun of it, or just because you're in the same state.
My next few articles will detail a proposal I make for insurance or whatever you want to call it. A wide-ranging proposal that probably won't be implemented right away, but hopefully it will get people talking.
I am not an insider when compared to many on this site. I do know what I know from simple observation and anyone that knows most of the shops knows that the man at the top of almost every one of them is a control freak that believes he has the best concept of how to run a sports book. Most I refer to are quite successful so I won't exactly say their concepts and way of doing business are bad, just that it doesn't lend itself to a couple of books getting together and doing the benevolent thing and taking over a book in trouble.
I am not an insider when compared to many on this site. I do know what I know from simple observation and anyone that knows most of the shops knows that the man at the top of almost every one of them is a control freak that believes he has the best concept of how to run a sports book. Most I refer to are quite successful so I won't exactly say their concepts and way of doing business are bad, just that it doesn't lend itself to a couple of books getting together and doing the benevolent thing and taking over a book in trouble.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by WINNA:
awesometime baby,
Stop being a crybaby. Just because you lost money in Blue Marlin, don't blame any other book in Costa Rica for your misfortunes. You should blame yourself, look in the mirror, thats who you blame, you crybaby.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Or better yet, maybe he outta just BOOT you in thre ASS, for being so insensitive.......
awesometime baby,
Stop being a crybaby. Just because you lost money in Blue Marlin, don't blame any other book in Costa Rica for your misfortunes. You should blame yourself, look in the mirror, thats who you blame, you crybaby.
Or better yet, maybe he outta just BOOT you in thre ASS, for being so insensitive.......
