Fishhead said:
What is wrong with bonus whoring if one follows all the rules and regulations put forth by a particular sportsbook?
For example, a book offers a 20% cash bonus with a 4x rollover and ones sends in money to receive the maximum bonus, plays through the 4x rollover rollover requirement, and withdraws his or hers money after deciding this book is not for them.
-Fishhead-
There is plenty wrong with bonus whoring. There is littlle difference between that and having a scam book put their ad up here. One cant complain against one with out having serious issues with the other. At least the scam books are paying the Rx to have their banner up here.
And it really does not matter whether one follows the books rules or not, if a bonus whore touts a scam book on here and sends people to it and they lose their money, what difference do the books make?
do bonus whores even pay a dime to those who fall victim to their antics?
One even wonders, why should a book even bother paying for a banner when all they have to do is send their lackeys into the forums to post lies and b/s about the book when it turns out that bonus whores are really in it to make a buck for themselves all the while pretending to be genuine gamblers or posters!!!!
Bonus whores and the books they tout are a scourge as bad as the scam books that have their banners up on here. (Only difference is RX makes money from one of the two)