Bookies Nightmare

[THEBUFFROCK]

I believe I am correct in saying that no matter what you played, EVERY SINGLE TEASER hit..........wow, no good for bookies! I was willing to bet at the end, they were gonna sack McNabb in the endzone to make the final 26-21 at least this would of offset most of the teasers as most everyone had a total of 47 at gametime.

 

[petre]

You Are Correct Sir

 

[tigerclicks]

My book needed Philly and the UNDER Big...No Teasers...

 

[petre]

Ne Played Like Crap


<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->NE PLAYED LIKE CRAP. gave was easy over and NE covers easily. NE didn't show for the 1st H and the game was over and NE for game but for the trade-off of NE's last FG for TD...

THE DEATH OF BRADY'S GRANDMUM for anyside or total made you loser/winner...you can't handicap for that...in VEGAS it is now known as GRANDMUM'S DAY :sad3:
<!-- / message -->

 

[one9]

I felt like the teaser was the only way to bet this game...

NE -1 / Under 53

NOTORIOUS

 

[dimeplayersonly]

guys.........all teasers hitting would normally take a bite out of the books profits in most instances......monday night football would be a prime example.......


but with the superbowl its a different story.....the multitude of prop bets almost always wash the traditional exotic bets, meaning add up all the exotics and your going to show a small plus or minus..........the biggest factor was the outcome of the side.....

 

[ElIguana]

Buffrock, ya gotta love these games where all teases hit--everyone is happy, and everyone wins.....except for the books! But according to dimeplayersonly, we shouldn't feel to sorry for the books. I'm sure they had a lot of action not only on the props but on the NE loss. I bet Philly +7 based on the fact that the books wouldn't take a bath with that much action on NE. It worked out this time.

 

[docgone]

dido El arty: