Bill O'Reilly is finished

[GAMEFACE]

on the radio and is crippled with his TV show.

I stopped watching Bill 6 months ago when I smelled a rat. Bills radio show has always been terrible and his Fox show has been average lately.

Bill has made it painfully obvious he's jockeying for a major network anchor job, which may explain his kissing up to Kerry and the left wing.

The final straw for Bill.

1. When he basically let Michael Moron make him look like a fool on his own show.

2. Attacked the Swiftvets for telling the truth.

3. Currently defends Rathers fraud docs.

 

[D2bets]

Wow, didn't know his own kind was turning on him. Thought you guys worshipped him.

Network anchor job??? LMFAO

 

[RobFunk]

gameface is firing everybody. first rather then o'reilly. i guess this is the forum version of the apprentice or something.

 

[GAMEFACE]

O'Reilly is a phony...

I really hate to have to slam the guy, however, I'll go with the painful truth on this one.

 

[GAMEFACE]

Bill should be embarrassed for what Moron did to him on his own TV show. I believe Bill was a willing accomplice.

 

[PatPatriot]

Got to agree with you Game...He has gotten way to full of himself.
Laura Ingraham ate his lunch last nite and she is playing clips of it right now on her radio show.

 

[GAMEFACE]

Pat,

I really liked the way O'Reilly stepped up after 9-11 when the charities were out of control, however, lately Bill has lost it.

I can no longer support the phony.

 

[truthteller]

What is phony about O'reilly?

Just last week you guys were praising him when he had Bill Maher lost for words.

 

[GAMEFACE]

TT,

I know you're a big supporter of O'Reilly, I was also at one time.

Bill is a phony because he acts as if he's not like the media elite when it turns out he is. Bill says he's investigating if the docs are real while he continues to defend Rather. The fact of the matter is Bill is a very smart man and knows the docs are fraudulent and is providing cover for Rather. Everyone now knows the docs are fraudulent, i don't believe Bill is the only person left that believes they are real. This is not going to look good for Rather or O'Reilly when this shakes out.

Not to mention the terrible job Bill did when he had Mike Moron on his TV show. I could not believe how poor of a job O'Reilly did. I have to believe O'Reilly allow that interview to go the way it did.

 

[xpanda]

Maybe because O'Reilly clearly remembers this case:

The Monsanto/Fox News issue, detailed in the movie The Corporation ruled as such:

___________
This latest decision stems from a case filed in 1998 by former Fox journalists Akre and Wilson who charged they were pressured to broadcast what they knew and documented to be lies about an artificial hormone injected into dairy cows, then fired when they refused and threatened to report the matter to the Federal Communications Commission.

After a five-week trial in 2000, a jury decided unanimously that Akre was fired solely because she threatened to blow the whistle to the FCC the broadcast of a false, distorted or slanted news report. The panel that found in Akre's favor awarded nothing to Wilson who represented himself at trial.

The Fox appeal was largely on an argument that it is not technically illegal for a broadcaster to deliberately distort the news on television. The appellate justices reasoned that since state law provides whistleblower protection only for employees who object to misconduct which is against an "adopted law, rule, or regulation" and they decided prohibitions against news distortion are merely a "policy" of the FCC, the reporters' eight-year-old lawsuit must have been without merit from its inception.

"The appellate judges were wrong to overturn the jury on the notion that it's not illegal for a broadcaster to lie in a television news report," Akre said.

"And what's even more shameful is that a broadcaster would argue that the First Amendment is broad enough to protect outright lies and deliberate distortion," Wilson added. "Remember this case the next time you hear `fair and balanced,' or `we report, you decide'."

In her ruling yesterday, Judge Maye noted, "Three different trial court judges believed this case had legal merit." Six times before Fox appealed its loss, those judges rejected that very same argument, deciding prohibitions against deliberate distortion of the news on the public airwaves was more than a mere violation of government policy.

Reading from the Jury Verdict Form, she also noted that six disinterested jurors decided Fox fired Akre for no other reason than her objection to airing a report the jurors agreed was "false, distorted, or slanted."

http://www.organicconsumers.org/rbgh/fox-news.cfm

 

[Oren1]

heaven forbid he gives the left wing a voice on his show on a network that calls itself "fair and ballanced" lmao you guys are tools.

 

[ChuckSims]

GAMEFACE, I agree 100% about the phony Bill O'Reily. He attacked the Swift Boat ads because they are making the difference in the election. Thats only something the elite media should be able to do.

 

[DrunkenHorseplayer]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by GAMEFACE:
O'Reilly is a phony...

I really hate to have to slam the guy, however, I'll go with the painful truth on this one. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

You're just now figuring out that a talk-show host is a phony?

 

[truthteller]

Game, there is a presumption of innocent until proven guilty in the US.

What O'reilly was saying is that there is no proof those docs are real or fake. So why should he bash Rather until there is 100% proof.

I wonder if you would have the same opinion if the GOP made those docs public and he acted the same way he is doing with Rather.

 

[GAMEFACE]

TT,

Everyone knows the docs are fraudulent, the stories out. Some guy put them together at Kinkos. Experts told CBS before they ran the story they had big problems with the docs and they look fake. O'Reilly knows chances are they are not real, Bill has went out of his way to provide protection for Rather.

O'Reilly works for the parent company of CBS. This should explain his motive, very sad.

 

[truthteller]

If you say those docs are fake, then that's an assumption.

I don't care much for Rather but looking at CNN, NBC, Fox, MSNBC I don't see any concrete proof they are fake.

There is not one headline you can show me that says " 100% Rather documents are fake."

 

[Shotgun]

Play linesmaker for us Truth. What are the odds you would make that the memos are authentic?

Even
+200
+300
+600
+1000
+2000
+3000
+4000?

 

[truthteller]

Since +10000 is not on your list, I will go to the next closest +4000.

Does that mean 100% true they are fake, NO!

 

[lander]

TT shows signs of non-partisianship (that doens't look like a word, but considering the standards lowered by our president - I think it'll pass this time around)

 

[kayaman+]

Who takes Fox News seriously???
Personally, I prefer news that's presented at above a 3rd grade reading level.