Big Fat UK Socialists Don't Know What to Do With Themselves

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
Obesity Epidemic Threatens Existence of NHS, Warn MPs

by Maxine Frith and Colin Brown
The Independent

Britain's "devastating" epidemic of obesity could threaten the very existence of the NHS, a report warns today.

Rising rates of heart disease, weight-related diabetes, cancer and other diseases threaten to cripple the health service and leave a generation of children who will die younger than their parents, the Commons Health Select Committee concluded.

John Reid, the Secretary of State for Health, yesterday postponed the Government's White Paper on public health until the Autumn following withering criticism of ministers for failing to take tougher action.

[PHAEDRUS ADDS: the news is bad -- best postpone it! That'll help!]

It accused Tessa Jowell, the Secretary of State for Culture, of being "naïve" and "espousing an idealistic and ill thought-through notion'' of backing the promotion of healthy foods rather than controls on advertising aimed at persuading children to eat unhealthy snacks.

[PHAEDRUS ADDS: ban advertising aimed at children, vs. attempt to educate children. Very wise. Also -- how much food do children actually buy, vs. what their parents buy them?]

The public health White Paper, which was to be published in July, will be used by Downing Street to test whether the Government will gain public support for tougher curbs, or be condemned for bringing in the "nanny state''. One Whitehall official said: "Ministers are not sure whether the public want to hear the Government saying it will ban advertising aimed at kids. We think the answer now is 'no' but they will put that to the test."

Mr Reid and Ms Jowell presented a united front yesterday to patch over their differences over demands for tougher controls on promotion of unhealthy snacks targeted at children. Advisers for the ministers insisted that they were "united'' in seeking a tougher voluntary code but would hold in reserve the threat of a ban on television advertising of fattening foods targeted at children.The 120-page report says the Government has failed to recognise the scale of the problem has not done enough to reduce and prevent the nation's expanding girth. It says that obesity could overtake smoking as the greatest cause of premature death.

An audit by the committee found that obesity and weight problems already cost the economy more than £7bn a year. David Hinchliffe, a Labour MP and chairman of the committee, said: "Our inquiry is a wake-up call for the Government. If the very existence of the NHS in its present form is threatened by costs spiralling totally out of control, it is hard to see that the Government will not, ultimately, be forced to intervene."

It too did not recommend a total ban on advertising of junk food to children - £178m was spent on advertising chocolate, sweets, crisps and snacks in 2002 - and ignored demands from for a "fat tax". Instead, as reported on Saturday by The Independent, it wants a voluntary ban on marketing to children but said legislation should be enacted if the industry had failed to rein in its advertising practices after three years.

[PHAEDRUS ADDS: "sin taxes" do not seem to have put a dent in any other vice; why would it work on delicious, affordable, legal fatty foods? Ah well, revenue's revenue ennit guv'nor? Got to feed the old exchequer ey wot!]

Two thirds of adults and one-in-four children are overweight or obese, an increase of 400 per cent since 1980. If the trends continue, more than half of all children will have a weight problem by 2020.Energy intakes have fallen by 750 kcals a day over the past 20 years, but activity levels have fallen more, by 800 kcals. "Out of this small imbalance has come the wave of obesity," says the report.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
icon_smile.gif


Its all that capitalist super sized processed shyte that they eat.

We need socialist laws to enforce a healthy food industry on the private sector.
Its for the good of society.
Self regulation just isn't working.

The capitalists have failed massively.

Tax the ass off fat and sugar in processed foods. $1 per 5 grams, that's what I would do.

The tax raised goes directly to the NHS.

next!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
585
Tokens
eek,

Why not just take the kids away from the parents and let the state take care of them once the kid is over 20% ideal body fat?

Your proposed tax plan would fund it, Hitler.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
No no no, they must choose for themselves.
Choice is what it's all about.

But the state wants a cut of those super sized profits to help repair the damage caused, like with smoking and alchohol.

After all, if the processed food industry doesn't give a f**k about our children, why on earth should we give a flying f**k about the processed food industry.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
585
Tokens
"profits come first, children second"

Some say, the same could be said about childhood herd vaccination programs. Do some research and sue the pharmaceutical companies, hospitals and doctors as well. Good luck on that one as parents are under the perception that they don't have a choice.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
Its all that capitalist super sized processed shyte that they eat.

We need socialist laws to enforce a healthy food industry on the private sector.
Its for the good of society.
Self regulation just isn't working.

The capitalists have failed massively.

Tax the ass off fat and sugar in processed foods. $1 per 5 grams, that's what I would do.

The tax raised goes directly to the NHS.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

LMAO. I can barely sit in the chair I am laughing so hard. I actually think you're kidding this time, to your credit.


<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
After all, if the processed food industry doesn't give a f**k about our children, why on earth should we give a flying f**k about the processed food industry.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Newsflash: the processed food industry (the one that saved humanity from gastrointestinal bacterial infections and dramatically improved living conditions for the entire world) doesn't raise or control your or anyone else's kids. It's parents that raise fat kids, not the manager at the local McDonald's (although of course, if he has kids, he might well raise them fat.)

What a bunch of evasive claptrap. As if parents bear no responsibility for these things -- it's all the big ugly corporations force-feeding McFish & Chips Volante to the wee ones and the government must come in and do something about that straightaway.

No wonder Britian is such a dead loss of a nation these days. Nothing less than they deserve.


Phaedrus
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
On a more serious note there will be lawsuits until McDonalds sorts its products out.

And like the smoking stuff, the PC lobby will get them in the end if they don't change.

There was a film about a bloke that ate nothing but McDonalds for a month (or more?).
The results were pretty horrendous.

I don't know what they put it it and I hardly ever eat it, but if I have a massive hangover (a mother of all hangovers hangover) a couple of cheeseburgers and a couple of xtra large fries really makes you feel better.
Its good hangover fodder.

The body seems to absorb whatever it contains incredibly quickly.

Ordinary non-processed food just doesn't do that.
The body has to work to absorb normal food, which is why you can't eat it if your hangover is really bad.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,908
Messages
13,575,089
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com