I'm going to stay away from both side and total and just enjoy the show. Rams 1-5-1 ATS last 7. For a team with their record seems like it is time for them to cover. You don't see teams like this continue not covering I also think they are better. But some holes there too. As far as the total.....hard to bet unders in the NFL now....especially with two teams like this. Unless one team outclasses the other and you get a 35-17 game(seems to be no sign of that)you are just hoping Stay away from the under. Don't care if it hits or not.....It isn't worth it JMO
LMAO, if you don't believe VEGAS KNOWS at times, I have sand in the desert for sale at a deep discount.....
Replay was put into play so VEGAS could help decide on the outcomes even easier and if you don't believe that, why is it clear as day on some calls and they go the other way???
HMMMMMMM.........
Somebody always has their hands in the cookie jar and thats just a fact!!!!!!!! Cookies are yummy!!!!!!!!!!
I will let him speak for himself, but I take “Vegas set up” to mean a situation where the books give themselves a significant advantage, not any allegation of a fix. The 63 may be that here - but total on Rams v. Saints was 57 and it was over in the third quarter. That was in a dome however. I think that game is what has driven this number up and I suspect public will trend over.