Benghazi is far from over

[russ1945]

[h=1]Benghazi Security Officer Warned U.S. Months Before Attack: ‘Everybody’ Will Die[/h]

312​

8​

The Associated Press

by AARON KLEIN28 Jun 2016277

[h=2]SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER[/h]​

[h=2]TEL AVIV – A U.S. government security officer serving at the U.S. Special Mission in Benghazi prior to the September 11, 2012 attacks, warned his superiors that lack of adequate security at the compound made serving there a “suicide mission.”[/h]The officer further predicted to his superiors “that there was a very good chance that everybody here was going to die.”
In a devastating indictment, the officer stated that a superior told him “everybody back here in D.C. knows that people are going to die in Benghazi, and nobody cares and nobody is going to care until somebody does die.”
The dramatic testimony was provided to the House Select Committee on Benghazi and contained in a 339-page House Democrat report on Benghazi released on Monday. The report was issued prior to the release on Tuesday of the Benghazi Committee’s final report.
The Select Committee reports quoted the officer as “Agent B,” explaining he served in Benghazi from November to December 2011 and was the State Department-provided Regional Security Officer (RSO) there for ten days in December 2011. RSOs are special agents of the State Department’s U.S. Diplomatic Security Service serving overseas.
Agent B says he was getting the “runaround” regarding additional security requests and that he gave his dire prediction to a superior.

When I took over as RSO, I called [the DS Desk Officer], because I was getting the runaround on some physical security requests, complaining to him vigorously, you know, what the problem was.
I told him that, you know—to use frank language, I told him that this was a suicide mission; that there was a very good chance that everybody here was going to die; that there was absolutely no ability here to prevent an attack whatsoever; that we were in a completely vulnerable position, and we needed help fast, we needed it quickly, or we were going to have dire consequences.
​

Agent B further described the dangerous security conditions and his appeal for what he said were “desperately” needed security upgrades.

Our perimeter security is non-existent, we have walls with lattices that somebody can shoot through; we have walls with footholds people can climb over; we have a 4-foot wall back here; we have no lighting. So all these physical security standards, especially around the perimeter of the building, were completely insufficient, and we needed large amounts of money and this was going to take time, it was going to be expensive, but we needed this desperately to make this place safe.
Agent B said that a superior informed him that DC employees at the State Department expected deaths in Benghazi to such an extent that they were already discussing a security investigation, or Accountability Review Board, to probe the Benghazi facility following any fatalities there.
[Redacted] told me, he said, [Redacted], everybody back here in D.C. knows that people are going to die in Benghazi, and nobody cares and nobody is going to care until somebody does die. The only thing that you and I can do is save our emails for the ARB that we all know is coming. So this was December of 2011. He made it very clear to me that in DS/IP, in the State Department, and he was speaking very broadly, that everybody knew that deaths in Benghazi were very likely, and that they were already talking about an ARB.
​

 

[russ1945]

(from the above)

In a devastating indictment, the officer stated that a superior told him “everybody back here in D.C. knows that people are going to die in Benghazi, and nobody cares and nobody is going to care until somebody does die.”


It is all about the truth coming out. Not everyone destroys all their emails LOL.

 

[russ1945]

[h=1]As Benghazi Attack Unfolded, White House Meeting Focused on Pastor Jones, YouTube Video[/h][h=2]Panetta, Dempsey tasked at meeting with ‘reaching out to Pastor Jones directly’[/h]SHARE
TWEET
EMAIL

Inside of the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi after the attack on Sept. 11, 2012 / AP​

BY: Alana Goodman
June 28, 2016 1:20 pm

Hillary Clinton and other senior Obama administration officials held an emergency meeting in the early hours of the Benghazi terrorist attack, and much of the discussion focused on a Florida pastor who criticized the Koran and an anti-Islam YouTube video, according to a report released by the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Tuesday.
Secretary Clinton appears to have been the most senior official to participate in the 7:30 p.m. teleconference, about four hours after the assault began on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. The attack lasted 13 hours in total and left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens.
Five of the 10 action items from the White House teleconference make reference to a YouTube video that mocked Islam, which had been blamed for stoking anti-American sentiment across the Muslim world, according to meeting notes reviewed by the House Benghazi committee. One of these action items said Clinton would “issue a statement tonight condemning the attacks and stating an official American was killed. … [the Secretary] may issue another statement to distance the United States from the Pastor Jones video.”
According to the Benghazi committee report, another action item mentioned “Leon E. Panetta, Secretary of Defense, and Martin E. Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, reaching out to ‘Pastor Jones’ directly.”
“Pastor Jones” is a reference to Terry Jones, a Florida church leader who drew international criticism in 2010 after promising to burn copies of the Koran. The proposed Koran-burning was met with violent protests across the Middle East and Asia.
Jones did not produce the 2012 YouTube video, and it is unclear why he was a focus at the meeting.
Clinton issued a statement shortly after the meeting condemning the attack in Benghazi and alluding to the YouTube video The Innocence of Muslims, a 14-minute low-budget trailer that mocked the religion.
“Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet,” said Clinton in the statement. “The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.”
For days after the attack, this explanation was echoed by others in the Obama administration. The State Department and the White House suggested that the attack erupted spontaneously out of a protest over the anti-Islam YouTube video.
According to the report by the Benghazi committee, State Department officials in Washington were receiving real-time information from security officers on the ground in Benghazi, which characterized the assault as a terrorist attack and did not mention any protests.
The State Department’s undersecretary of management Patrick Kennedy relayed this information to Clinton throughout the evening, he told the committee.
In private conversations during the night of the attack, Clinton described the attack as an act of terrorism carried out by an “al Qaeda-like group.” The terror organization Ansar al-Sharia took credit for the assault.
“The fact the 7:30 p.m. White House meeting, which took place while Ambassador Stevens was considered missing and before Tyrone S. Woods and Glen A. Doherty were killed, was about the attacks in Benghazi but much of the conversation focused on the video is surprising given no direct link or solid evidence existed connecting the attacks in Benghazi and the video at the time the White House meeting took place,” said the Benghazi committee report.
The report also found that no U.S. military assets ever left the ground to try to get to Benghazi during the 13-hour siege. Ambassador Chris Stevens, Foreign Service officer Sean Smith were killed during the initial ground attack on the consulate. CIA contractors Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were killed hours later while defending the nearby CIA annex that came under mortar and machine gun fire.
The Obama administration has said there were no nearby military assets available, and the closest response teams would not have been able to reach the consulate in time.
The 800-page report was released on Tuesday by the Republican majority members of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, and it is based on interviews with over 100 witnesses and 75,000 pages of new documents.
In a statement on Tuesday, Benghazi committee chairman Trey Gowdy (R., S.C.)said he and his colleagues had conducted the investigation “in a manner worthy of the American people’s respect, and worthy of the memory of those who died.”
“I simply ask the American people to read this report for themselves, look at the evidence we have collected, and reach their own conclusions,” said Gowdy. “You can read this report in less time than our fellow citizens were taking fire and fighting for their lives on the rooftops and in the streets of Benghazi.”
The Clinton campaign blasted the committee report on Tuesday, saying it was a “partisan” effort to “hurt Hillary Clinton’s campaign.”
“After more than two years and more than $7 million in taxpayer funds, the Committee report has not found anything to contradict the conclusions of the multiple, earlier investigations,” said the Clinton campaign.

 

[russ1945]

[h=1]House Benghazi Report Details Military, Intelligence Failures[/h][h=2]Report says U.S. did not attempt to deploy assets, troops during Benghazi attack[/h]SHARE
TWEET
EMAIL

Gutted U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, after Sept. 11, 2012 attack / AP​

BY: Alana Goodman
June 28, 2016 5:00 am

The U.S. military never attempted to deploy any assets or troops to Benghazi during the 13-hour attack on the American consulate in 2012, according to a supplemental reportreleased by the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Tuesday morning.
Although Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has said he ordered three support teams to deploy to Benghazi about two hours into the attack, the committee said it found no evidence that these forces were mobilized until hours after the attack ended. Military assets, such as fighter planes and armed drones never left the ground, according to the report.
“We are now convinced, contrary to the administration’s public claim that the military did not have time to get to Benghazi, that the administration never launched men or machines to help directly in the fight,” wrote Reps. Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) and Jim Jordan (R., Ohio) in the analysis. “That is very different from what we have been told to date. And the evidence is compelling.”
The congressmen issued their assessment as a supplement to the long-awaited report by the Benghazi Committee. According to the analysis, the Obama administration was fixated on how to frame the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attack to the public, and spent little time trying to coordinate a military response while the attack was ongoing.
The attack took place less than two months before the 2012 presidential election. There were early indications the assault was planned—such as targeted mortar fire—but Obama administration officials initially linked it to spontaneous anti-American protests that had occurred the same day in Cairo.
Four Americans died in the 13-hour battle: U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens, Foreign Service officer Sean Smith, and CIA contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.
In the hours and days that followed the assault, Secretary Hillary Clinton, United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice, and other administration officials publicly suggested that the attack spontaneously spun out of a protest over an anti-Islam video.
Officials later blamed this erroneous assessment on conflicting intelligence and confusion during the attack. But diplomatic security agents who spoke to the committee said there were no signs or reports of protests on the ground and it was clear early on that they were facing a coordinated terrorist assault.
The House Benghazi Committee, led by Chairman Trey Gowdy (R., S.C.), has interviewed nearly 100 witnesses and reviewed over 75,000 pages of documents as part of its investigation into the attack.
The committee’s report relied on testimony that diplomatic security agents at the compound gave to the committee. One of the agents said there was “Zip, nothing, nada” to indicate that there were protests in Benghazi leading up to the attack. Another agent who said there was no sign of protesters was also providing dispatches to Washington “every 15 to 30 minutes throughout the night—giving the State Department virtually a front row seat to the attack.”
Other security officials said there were signs of growing threats in Benghazi in the months leading up to the attack. Nine months earlier, one diplomatic security officer testified that he told a State Department security desk officer shortly after arriving in Benghazi that his trip there “was a suicide mission; that there was a very good chance that everybody here was going to die; that there was absolutely no ability here to prevent an attack whatever.”
The desk officer in Washington reportedly responded that “everybody back here in D.C. knows that people are
going to die in Benghazi, and nobody cares and nobody
is going to care until somebody does die.”
But according to committee testimony from security officers, there was pressure from Washington for the outpost to remain open in Benghazi and for Ambassador Chris Stevens to bring the State Department a “deliverable”—a permanent consulate in Benghazi.
The report also referred to an internal State Department talking points memo, which was circulated by a public relations officer on September 17, 2012. The document said officials “have not yet seen any signs that the attack on our consulate in Benghazi was other than premeditated or coordinated.” But in the draft obtained by the Benghazi committee, there were strike marks through words “premeditated or coordinated” and they were replaced by the word “spontaneous.”
According to Reps. Pompeo and Jordan, the document suggests that the State Department changed its public comments to reflect UN Ambassador Rice’s televised claim that the attack was “spontaneous.”
“No one asked about it could explain the change,” wrote the congressmen. “The change—from the truth to a known false statement—is troubling.”
Democrats on the Benghazi Committee, who have been critical of the investigation, released their own report blasting Gowdy on Monday.
They accused the committee chairman of “trying to land a front-page conviction rather than a neutral judge of facts seeking to improve the security of our diplomatic corps.”
A spokesperson for Gowdy responded by accusing Democrats of failing to participate in the committee’s investigation and obstructing it in order to defend Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
“As Chairman Gowdy has said, this is not about one person,” said spokesman Matt Wolking. “This investigation is about the four brave Americans we lost in Libya: Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty. That is how the Majority has conducted its thorough investigation, and we look forward to revealing the new information we have uncovered to the families and the American people.”

 

[russ1945]

[h=1]Benghazi Committee Releases Final Report, Slams Clinton[/h]

5079​

34​

ABDULLAH DOMA/AFP/GettyImages

by JOEL B. POLLAK28 Jun 20162,162

[h=2]SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER[/h]​

[h=2]The U.S. House Select Committee on Benghazireleased its final report on Tuesday morning, comprising some 800 pages of investigations and conclusions that suggest former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration were derelict in their duty to protect American diplomats from the most significant terror attack on the U.S. since Sep. 11, 2001.[/h]The report also details how the Obama administration contrived to misinform the public about the cause of the attack.
The committee had already slammed a separate report Monday by its Democratic members, who had long maintained that the investigation was politically motivated. “Benghazi Committee Democrats’ obsession with the former Secretary of State is on full display. For over two years they refused to participate in the Majority’s serious, fact-centered investigation. The dishonest Democrats on this committee falsely claimed everything had been ‘asked and answered.’ They said the committee had found ‘absolutely nothing new.’ If that’s changed, they should come clean and admit it. If not, everyone can ignore their rehashed, partisan talking points defending their endorsed candidate for president,” an official statement by the committee declared.
For its own part, the committee published a list of facts that it said were new insights revealed by the investigation:

• Despite President Obama and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta’s clear orders to deploy military assets, nothing was sent to Benghazi, and nothing was en route to Libya at the time the last two Americans were killed almost 8 hours after the attacks began. [pg. 141]
• With Ambassador Stevens missing, the White House convened a roughly two-hour meeting at 7:30 PM, which resulted in action items focused on a YouTube video, and others containing the phrases “f any deployment is made,” and “Libya must agree to any deployment,” and “[w]ill not deploy until order comes to go to either Tripoli or Benghazi.” [pg. 115]
  [*]The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff typically would have participated in the White House meeting, but did not attend because he went home to host a dinner party for foreign dignitaries. [pg. 107]
  [*]A Fleet Antiterrorism Security Team (FAST) sat on a plane in Rota, Spain, for three hours, and changed in and out of their uniforms four times. [pg. 154]
  [*]None of the relevant military forces met their required deployment timelines. [pg. 150]
  [*]The Libyan forces that evacuated Americans from the CIA Annex to the Benghazi airport was not affiliated with any of the militias the CIA or State Department had developed a relationship with during the prior 18 months. Instead, it was comprised of former Qadhafi loyalists who the U.S. had helped remove from power during the Libyan revolution. [pg. 144]
  

Part II

• Five of the 10 action items from the 7:30 PM White House meeting referenced the video, but no direct link or solid evidence existed connecting the attacks in Benghazi and the video at the time the meeting took place. The State Department senior officials at the meeting had access to eyewitness accounts to the attack in real time. The Diplomatic Security Command Center was in direct contact with the Diplomatic Security Agents on the ground in Benghazi and sent out multiple updates about the situation, including a “Terrorism Event Notification.” The State Department Watch Center had also notified Jake Sullivan and Cheryl Mills that it had set up a direct telephone line to Tripoli. There was no mention of the video from the agents on the ground. Greg Hicks—one of the last people to talk to Chris Stevens before he died—said there was virtually no discussion about the video in Libya leading up to the attacks. [pg. 28]
• The morning after the attacks, the National Security Council’s Deputy Spokesperson sent an email to nearly two dozen people from the White House, Defense Department, State Department, and intelligence community, stating: “Both the President and Secretary Clinton released statements this morning. … Please refer to those for any comments for the time being. To ensure we are all in sync on messaging for the rest of the day, Ben Rhodes will host a conference call for USG communicators on this chain at 9:15 ET today.” [pg. 39]
• Minutes before the President delivered his speech in the Rose Garden, Jake Sullivan wrote in an email to Ben Rhodes and others: “There was not really much violence in Egypt. And we are not saying that the violence in Libya erupted ‘over inflammatory videos.’” [pg. 44]
• According to Susan Rice, both Ben Rhodes and David Plouffe prepared her for her appearances on the Sunday morning talk shows following the attacks. Nobody from the FBI, Department of Defense, or CIA participated in her prep call. While Rhodes testified Plouffe would “normally” appear on the Sunday show prep calls, Rice testified she did not recall Plouffe being on prior calls and did not understand why he was on the call in this instance. [pg.98]
• On the Sunday shows, Susan Rice stated the FBI had “already begun looking at all sorts of evidence” and “FBI has a lead in this investigation.” But on Monday, the Deputy Director, Office of Maghreb Affairs sent an email stating: “McDonough apparently told the SVTS [Secure Video Teleconference] group today that everyone was required to ‘shut their pieholes’ about the Benghazi attack in light of the FBI investigation, due to start tomorrow.” [pg. 135]
• After Susan Rice’s Sunday show appearances, Jake Sullivan assured the Secretary of the State that Rice “wasn’t asked about whether we had any intel. But she did make clear our view that this started spontaneously and then evolved.” [pg. 128]
• Susan Rice’s comments on the Sunday talk shows were met with shock and disbelief by State Department employees in Washington. The Senior Libya Desk Officer, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, State Department, wrote: “I think Rice was off the reservation on this one.” The Deputy Director, Office of Press and Public Diplomacy, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, State Department, responded: “Off the reservation on five networks!” The Senior Advisor for Strategic Communications, Bureau of Near East Affairs, State Department, wrote: “WH [White House] very worried about the politics. This was all their doing.” [pg. 132]
• The CIA’s September 13, 2012, intelligence assessment was rife with errors. On the first page, there is a single mention of “the early stages of the protest” buried in one of the bullet points. The article cited to support the mention of a protest in this instance was actually from September 4. In other words, the analysts used an article from a full week before the attacks to support the premise that a protest had occurred just prior to the attack on September 11. [pg. 47]
• A headline on the following page of the CIA’s September 13 intelligence assessment stated “Extremists Capitalized on Benghazi Protests,” but nothing in the actual text box supports that title. As it turns out, the title of the text box was supposed to be “Extremists Capitalized on Cairo Protests.” That small but vital difference—from Cairo to Benghazi—had major implications in how people in the administration were able to message the attacks. [pg. 52]

Part III

• During deliberations within the State Department about whether and how to intervene in Libya in March 2011, Jake Sullivan listed the first goal as “avoid[ing] a failed state, particularly one in which al-Qaeda and other extremists might take safe haven.” [pg. 9]
• The administration’s policy of no boots on the ground shaped the type of military assistance provided to State Department personnel in Libya. The Executive Secretariats for both the Defense Department and State Department exchanged communications outlining the diplomatic capacity in which the Defense Department SST security team members would serve, which included wearing civilian clothes so as not to offend the Libyans. [pg. 60]
• When the State Department’s presence in Benghazi was extended in December 2012, senior officials from the Bureau of Diplomatic Security were excluded from the discussion. [pg. 74]
• In February 2012, the lead Diplomatic Security Agent at Embassy Tripoli informed his counterpart in Benghazi that more DS agents would not be provided by decision makers, because “substantive reporting” was not Benghazi’s purpose. [pg. 77]
• Emails indicate senior State Department officials, including Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan, and Huma Abedin were preparing for a trip by the Secretary of State to Libya in October 2012. According to testimony, Chris Stevens wanted to have a “deliverable” for the Secretary for her trip to Libya, and that “deliverable” would be making the Mission in Benghazi a permanent Consulate. [pg. 96]
• In August 2012—roughly a month before the Benghazi attacks—security on the ground worsened significantly. Ambassador Stevens initially planned to travel to Benghazi in early August, but cancelled the trip “primarily for Ramadan/security reasons.” [pg. 99]
• Former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta bluntly told the committee “an intelligence failure” occurred with respect to Benghazi. Former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell also acknowledged multiple times an intelligence failure did in fact occur prior to the Benghazi attacks. [pg. 129]

The report also slams the Obama administration for “intentional failure to cooperate with this and other congressional investigations.”

 

[russ1945]

[h=1]Sharyl Attkisson: Obama and Clinton Lied to the Public, ‘Impeded the Investigation’[/h]

53​

0​

AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster

by BREITBART NEWS28 Jun 201652

[h=2]SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER[/h]​

[h=2]Award-winning veteran investigative journalistSharyl Attkisson reports on the 40-page supplemental report Congressmen Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Mike Pompeo (R-KS) attached to the larger Benghazi report released Tuesday morning. The Jordan-Pompeo report makes clear that the Obama White House and Hillary Clinton’s State Department impeded the investigation and knowingly misled the public about the 9-11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. [/h]White House “Impeded the Investigation”
In the end, Republicans say the White House “impeded the investigation” making it impossible to answer all outstanding questions. “The Committee ended its work without having spoken to anyone in the White House Situation Room that night,” wrote Jordan and Pompeo. “Nor did we receive all email communication between White House staffers concerning the attackall off limits to Congressaccording to White House lawyers.”
President Obama’s whereabouts during the attacks and his precise actions remain unknown and publicly unaccounted for. White House press secretary Josh Earnest blocked release of White House photos taken that night that could provide insight. And the President did not respond to the Committee’s questions.
At times, the Obama administration provided false information, says the Jordan-Pompeo report. When they sought to identify and interview the military operator who guided an unmanned military drone flying over the compound while the attacks were underway, a Defense Department official claimed, “The [Defense] Department has expended significant resources to locate anyone who might match the description of this person, to no avail.” However, that claim was proven “completely false,” said Republicans. Eventually, the Department of Defense produced the witness.
As to what military assets might have been available, but were not called upon, Republicans say the Defense Department refused to fill in those blanks.
“The military has failed to provide a clear, specific inventory of every armed aircraft whether manned or unmanned that could have flown to Benghazi during the 7-plus hours from the beginning of the attack to the mortar rounds hitting the CIA Annex. Instead, the military has insisted that the Committee simply accept the word of senior military officers, some without firsthand knowledge of the events, as an adequate substitute for actual eye witnesses.”
Democrats claim, “The Defense Department could not have done anything differently on the night of the attacks that would have saved the lives of the four brave Americans killed in Benghazi, and although the military’s global posture prevented it from responding more quickly that night, improvements were made years ago.”
Obama Administration’s Public vs. Private Statements
Using government documents, Jordan and Pompeo spent many pages in their report contrasting the private and public statements of Obama officials at the time. For example, Clinton emailed her daughter at 11:23 p.m. the night of the attacks, “Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an Al Queda- like [sic] group[.]” But Clinton didn’t mention terrorism or al-Qaeda in her public remarks the following morning when she implied a YouTube video sparked protesters who had gotten out of control and attacked.
Meantime, Clinton’s Acting Assistant Secretary Beth Jones privately told Libya’s Ambassador to the U.S. that “the group that conducted the attacks Ansar Al Sharia is affiliated with Islamic extremists.” And Clinton told Egypt’s Prime Minister in private that, “We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack not a protest we believe the group that claimed responsibility for this was affiliated with al Qaeda.”
After then-U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice appeared on Sunday talk shows furthering the false narrative blaming a spontaneous protest for the violence, documents show some State Department officials reacted with shock and disbelief.
One State Department official emailed another:
“The horse has left the barn on this, don’t you think? Rice was on FIVE Sunday Morning shows yesterday saying this. Tough to walk back.”
Other State Department officials chimed in:
“[State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland] planned on walking it back just a bit, though.”
“I think Rice was off the reservation on this one.”
“Yup. Luckily there’s enough in her language to fudge exactly what she said/meant.”
“Off the reservation on five networks!”
“[White House] very worried about the politics. This was all their doing.”
But instead of correcting Rice’s statements, Republicans say the State Department may have changed its public statements to match Rice’s claims. “No one asked about it could explain the change. The change from the truth to a known false statement is troubling,” say Republicans.
Rice was later considered to succeed Clinton as Secretary of State. As controversy over her statements lingered, she withdrew her name. President Obama later appointed her to become his National Security Advisor.

 

[vitterd]

Republicans exploiting American deaths for political purposes.....just another day in the GOP

 

[GasMan]

You are sick vitterd...that you even think that way as opposed to channeling your anger towards your own people.

Remember the daily body counts by the Dems and liberal media during Bush's tenure?

How bout the blame going on a You Tube video for political expediency?

 

[vitterd]

You are sick vitterd...that you even think that way as opposed to channeling your anger towards your own people.

Remember the daily body counts by the Dems and liberal media during Bush's tenure?

How bout the blame going on a You Tube video for political expediency?

8 hearings, even republicans admitted this was a political witch hunt......enough is enough. Stop using these deaths like repubs used 9/11/2001 deaths. It's disgusting.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Russ never gave up on Benghazi and has now been vindicated.

These people should be in jail.

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Russ never gave up on Benghazi and has now been vindicated.

These people should be in jail.

Yes they should but they won’t be. Reality rears it’s ugly head once again.

 

[russ1945]

Republicans exploiting American deaths for political purposes.....just another day in the GOP

Wrong - Democrats ignoring American deaths for political purposes - nothing new

 

[GasMan]

8 hearings, even republicans admitted this was a political witch hunt......enough is enough. Stop using these deaths like repubs used 9/11/2001 deaths. It's disgusting.

So I guess youre ok with lies...huh, go figure.

 

[The Guesser]

8 hearings, even republicans admitted this was a political witch hunt......enough is enough. Stop using these deaths like repubs used 9/11/2001 deaths. It's disgusting.

THe good news is that outside their sick bubble, most normal people realize this, are disgusted by it, It's a counterproductive subject for the R's, and has been for years. When MCCarthy gave the game away, that it was a Political Witch hunt, designed simply to hurt Hillary's POTUS run, it was game over, and Hillary accentuated it with her devastation of Gowdy and the fools, in her 11 hour beatdown.

 

[GasMan]

Wrong - Democrats ignoring American deaths for political purposes - nothing new

Correct. But the left doesnt care as they are soulless losers.

 

[SheriffJoe]

So I guess youre ok with lies...huh, go figure.

Yep, RINOs don't have the guts to prosecute and hang these bastards, so poker fraud doc thinks they did nothing wrong.

"It's time to move on" - Hildabeast after the damning report

Disgusting, indeed.

 

[SheriffJoe]

vit, don't tell anyone but I'm voting for Hillary

:>(

 

[The Guesser]

:>(

It's hard to take Scott's lame go to move, and make it even lamer. Congrats Casper, you find a way.

 

[vitterd]

It's hard to take Scott's lame go to move, and make it even lamer. Congrats Casper, you find a way.

Con man Joe is a known follower. He has nothing original......ever. Well, except his "vit is doc mercer" thingface)(*^%

 

[ScottL]

It's hard to take Scott's lame go to move, and make it even lamer. Congrats Casper, you find a way.

Unfortunately for you my go to move is to address your stupid with smarts. The quote addendums just add to the fun. Now go pick up the snotrag one of the customers just dropped on the floor.