Hi just had a question of sorts. team a 3 overs plays team b 3 unders so its a no play game. them a wins over and if i understand you correctly it is now a game 2 play its next game. why not take it as a game 1 so you have 3 chances to win as opposed to 2? team b has lost i guess you would have one and now is a new count correct? I guess my thinling is lower investments might reduce the occasional big bet? good luck as usual heart222
So, if I understand you correctly, Team A has 3 overs... so they're an under play. Team B has 3 unders... so they're an over play. They are playing eachother, so we skip the play because they're both Game 1s and its a conflict.
The idea here is to win 1 unit profit from Team A, and 1 unit profit from Team B. So after the game is over, there is one winning series and one losing series (unless the line is 5 or 6 and it pushes.) By skipping the conflict, we are missing out on the Game 1 profit from Team A or Team B, whichever total won. This means that we must bet the losing total TO WIN 2 UNITS in order to recover the lost unit of profit from the other series.
Now, if you want to chase this for 3 games, then go ahead. But this system is built so that no team has more than 6 overs or 6 unders consecutively. What you're suggesting would make this a 4 game chase (since we're betting to win 2 units on the conflicting series.) However, if you were to only bet TO WIN 1 UNIT on this series, then obviously you would count the next game as Game 1 (because there's no losses to recover.) In this case, then you're still betting a 3-game chase... its the same thing, unless you start fudging with the amount of units your trying to win.
The way I have this setup, we're trying to win 1 unit on EVERY SERIES that fits the criteria. I skip no plays, and pass on no games. As a player of the system, you can make whatever decisions you want... but as a poster of this system, I will include every series and every bet. So, if you want to alter the system to meet your own personal guidelines, then feel free to do so. But when a system play is conflicted, I will go after BOTH units that are to be won... I will not give up on the "missed unit" and forfeit it. We need every win we can get to pay for all the losses in order to keep the 7-to-1 ratio in order. Remember this ratio, and remember that every series you "skip" and every unit you fail to win will cost you money when you suffer a series loss.
But, modify this as you wish. You can chase this system for 82 games if you want, but most of us don't have the bankroll for that, and not many people are interested in risking 20+ units just to win 1 unit. Otherwise, we'd all be betting -2000 moneylines!!
