Articles That I feel can help you In all Sports

Search

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
MLB Handicapping: Betting Low Baseball Totals
by Nicholas Tolomeo - 7/22/2010
spacer.gif

heath-bell-2.jpg

For a number of different reasons this season of baseball has been the summer of the pitcher. After years of juiced up sluggers belting 60 and 70 home runs, numerous shattered offensive records, bandbox ballparks and steroid abuse – which, in turn, led to pitcher abuse, the pitchers are once again taking over the game.
It is been evidenced this season by the two perfect games (nearly three) and the four no-hitters. There is proof in the .260 league-wide batting average and the team average of 4.4 runs per game. Those are numbers not seen since before the steroid era began around 1995. Maybe no stat is more telling than the home run leader this season through 95 games. Jose Bautista of the Toronto Blue Jays leads all players with 26 home runs. During Barry Bonds’ record-setting year, the San Francisco slugger had 44 home runs by July 26. No hitter will even be at 30 at that point this season.

Pitchers have not been this dominant since 1993. The National League’s best team, the San Diego Padres, have some of the best starting pitching in baseball and by far the best bullpen. They play in Petco Park, a hitter’s nightmare and a pitcher’s dream. In years past that combination of pitching and a cavernous ballpark would not equal best record in the league, but the Padres have ridden the pitching wave to a record of 55-39.
There are more reasons for the summer of the pitcher outside of San Diego. There are the young pitchers named Ubaldo, Josh and Stephen, who have displayed dominance on the mound beyond their years. There are the former Cy Young candidates still being their dominant selves like Roy Halladay, Adam Wainwright, Cliff Lee and Felix Hernandez.
The oddsmakers have been busy all summer adjusting the totals. In the past two months there have been seven totals of six runs, a figure unheard of the last few seasons. Totals of 7.5 and below are now commonplace when looking at the day’s baseball lines.
Adjustments had to be made after the ‘under’ consistently outperformed the ‘over’ through the first two months of the season. Even after the totals continued to drop, the ‘under’ still owns a 686-665 edge this season.
Specifically, the lower the totals have been lately, the more likely the game will stay ‘under’. Since June 1, in games with a total of 7.5 or less, the ‘over’ is only 66-77-3. It seems that the oddsmakers have found that totals of 6 and 6.5 are a little too late. The ‘over’ is 19-13-1 in those situations. Totals of 6 and 6.5 are usually only seen at Petco Park or at Safeco Field where the Seattle Mariners play. A recent interleague series turned out to be a match made in pitcher’s heaven when Seattle visited San Diego. In the three-game series, two totals were six with the other total being set at 6.5. Betting the ‘under’ in those circumstances yields very little value as there is hardly no room for error.
When the total is in the 7 and 7.5 range, well that is another story. Since June 1 in games with a total of 7, the ‘over’ is 18-22-1. When the total is 7.5 the ‘over’ is 30-42-1. Combined the ‘over’ is 48-64-2 when the total is either 7 or 7.5.
Outside of San Diego and Seattle, oddsmakers have been reluctant to bring totals down to 6 and 6.5 so 7 and 7.5 seems to be the compromise that has been settled on. In that range, regardless of the ballpark or the pitchers, recent history has shown there is plenty of value. New ballparks and new steroid policies have been a boon for pitchers, if played right, those could also add up to be a nice windfall for bettors taking the ‘under’.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
A Look At NFC Win Props

Submitted by nick on Sat, 2010-07-31 01:00
DIRECT FROM NEVADA WITH NICK BOGDANOVICH
AN EARLY LOOK AT NFC REGULAR SEASON WIN PROPS
The offshore places have had Regular Season Victory props up for a few days now. That's given the sharp money time to influence the openers from the oddsmakers. I'm going to look at the NFC for you in today's report...because the defending Super Bowl champion is the New Orleans Saints. I'll come back in a couple of days and run the numbers for you in the AFC.
For each team I'm either going to post the range I'm seeing offshore (lines can differ by a half a game to a game with various juice), or the standard moneyline I'm seeing if there's general agreement on the number of wins. For example...Atlanta's pretty much at 9 wins everywhere...with the standard juice right now on the Over at -130. Dallas on the other hand is at 10 wins in some places, 10.5 in others. You can safely assume that betting Over the lower number and Under the higher number has added juice...sometimes a lot.
As always, if you have an opinion, it's best to shop around to get the best number. The great thing about 'futures' bets is that you'll find some variety if you shop. The worst thing from the bettor's perspective is that the sportsbooks get to hold your money in interest bearing accounts for several months while you sit wondering whether or not you're going to win!
Let's start in the NFC South, the home of New Orleans. Then I'll take you East to West through the divisions.
NFC SOUTH
New Orleans 10.5 (Under -125)
Atlanta 9 (Over -130)
Carolina 7 to 7.5 (Under -130)
Tampa Bay 5.5 (Over -130)
You might be surprised that New Orleans is so low given that they went 13-3 last year before going the distance in the playoffs. Why the drop to 10.5? It's very hard to repeat in this league. Opponents gear up to stop what you're doing. Injuries are likely to hit much harder right after a great year just because you were probably enjoying good injury luck through the success. If Drew Brees gets hurt, so you think the Saints have a great shot to get to 11 wins? Betting on any team to reach double digits is, in essence, betting on good injury luck.
Atlanta is seen as the only other playoff contender right now in this division. Remember that 8-8 represents a .500 mark, and that rarely reaches the postseason. The market says Carolina and Tampa Bay are unlikely to get to eight wins.
NFC EAST
Dallas 10 to 10.5
NY Giants 8.5 (Over -125)
Philadelphia 8.5
Washington 7.5 (Under -130)
This is always an interesting division...and it just got MORE interesting in the offseason when Donovan McNabb went from Philadelphia to Washington. Mike Shanahan is the head coach of the Redskins this year. The market is optimistic that he'll improve on last year's dismal 4-12 mark...but pessimistic that he'll get the Redskins out of the cellar in this very tough division.
As is the case in most seasons, Dallas, the NY Giants, and Philadelphia are all playoff contenders. Should be a great race once again.
NFC NORTH
Green Bay 9.5 (Over -140)
Minnesota 9.5
Chicago 7.5 to 8
Detroit 5 to 5.5
Green Bay takes over as the divisional favorite because of the uncertainty surrounding Brett Favre. The market thinks Favre is likely to return...but not definite to return. I think the Vikings would at least tie Green Bay on the moneyline if it was clear that Favre was ready to start the season at full health.
Not much of a reaction regarding Chicago where Mike Martz is taking over as offensive coordinator. The Bears went 7-9 last year, and are picked to finish right around that this season. You may think 5 wins seems too high for Detroit. They were just 2-14 last year. These props rarely go much below five just because of the historical tendency for everyone to regress to the middle. I know a few sharps who won good prop money last year just by asking the terrible teams to stay terrible. That may not work two years in a row.
NFC WEST
San Francisco 8.5 to 9
Arizona 7.5 (Over -130)
Seattle 7 to 7.5
St. Louis 4.5 to 5.5
Hey, look at that. The market is picking San Francisco to win the West! Arizona will be starting Matt Leinart at quarterback this year because Kurt Warner retired. Seattle and St. Louis are in rebuilding periods. The 49ers finished 8-8 last year, and step up by default.
Do I believe San Francisco is ready to take the division? I can see why the market respects them more than the others. It's worth noting that the market wasn't that enthusiastic about Arizona each of the past two seasons...then didn't believe in them much in the playoffs either. If you think that was ALL Kurt Warner, then I can see dropping Arizona. If you respect the coaching staff and some of their other talent, this may be a third straight year where oddsmakers were caught napping with the Cards.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
10 COMMANDMENTS OF SPORTS BETTING
by Badger of Predictem.com

So you want to become a full-fledged member of the billion-dollar-a-year sports gambling industry, only you think you have what it takes to beat the masses? You’re think you're the next Jimmy the Greek?

There are ways to help “even the odds” in your favor.

The truth is there is only one proven way to win consistently (although having lady-luck on your side is also a major plus). You MUST know the sport you are betting on, and you have to pick out the games where the oddsmakers erred in setting the odds.

There’s no magic formula, no computer simulating system, there’s no “insider” secrets. But there are ways to increase your chances so you win more than you lose.

I like to call these the 10 Commandments of Sports Gambling.

1. Do not bet on sports if it affects your health. If you are a hard loser, if you have high blood pressure, a bad ticker, or just can’t let those bad beats go, then this isn’t the game for you because losing is inevitable. Betting on sports is like the stock market ... you’re going to win sometimes, and you WILL lose sometimes. The goal is consistency and longevity. Think marathon; not sprint!

2. If you pass the first commandment, and you really want to win money, then you must approach sports gambling as a job. It cannot be a hobby, and you cannot go about your business half-assed. Each spread (or game) is a business deal that you’ll either do, or you’ll pass on. A knowledgeable businessman should research each deal on it's merits, then decide. Going into a business deal without knowing anything about the teams, terms or circumstances usually results in bad business. Which means you go outta business real quick.

3. Bet the same amount of money on every game you bet. This one will cause a few arguments amongst some bettors, but it’s a common mistake among social or weekend betters. Even if you really like that one game, but only kind of like two other games, bet all three the same. When you put $500 on one, but only $100 on the others you’re only setting yourself up to fall hard. Sure the $500 game might cash in, but how many times has the $500 missed, dropping you into a hole you never recover from. There is no 5-star, 3-star, 1-star ... there is no “system” ... anyone that tells you these things is not a successful gambler unless they have extremely deep pockets to eat a 5- star loss every now and then.

4. Stay away from parlays, teasers, props and other exotic bets like first half/second half bets and the first 5 innings bets unless you are willing to just hand over cash. They are all a bookie’s (or sportsbooks) wet dream. Sure you get paid 10-to-1 if you hit a 4- teamer, but the chances of it happening, consistently, are about the same as your odds of sleeping with Heidi Klum. Instead of one bet on four teams, put your money on the four teams separately. That way when 3-out-of-4 win, you walk away a winner instead of cussing “that damn fourth team!” There’s a reason sportsbooks offer these bets and it’s not because they like to pay you 10-times your bet when they lose. It’s because they ALL put more money in their own pockets. The lure of fast money is too enticing for some people to not realize they’re walking into a trap.

5. Know when to walk away and don’t chase! This is obviously the biggest problem for most gamblers. How many times have you lost on a noon NFL game, dropped into a hole, then made it worse by betting a couple of afternoon games to try and make it up only to take it deeper without lube. Likewise, you win a noon game, then try and double it by betting an afternoon game only to lose and break even. DON’T FALL INTO THIS TRAP. Pick the games you’re going to bet on ahead of time, bet them, then walk away. Don’t compound your problems by trying to double it or win it back by betting on a game you didn’t want to bet on in the first place. Don’t chase by betting on the second half because you already lost the original bet in the first half. This is the hardest rule to follow sometimes because it goes against every gambling fiber in your body. But if you want to win, win consistently, you have to follow it.

6. The walk away rule also applies before the games as well. If you look at the point spreads in the morning and nothing appeals to you, don’t bet. Let’s face it, oddsmakers are good at what they do. Sometimes too good. You must remember that you’re looking for an oddsmaker’s mistakes, but if you have a hard time finding a game you like, take a day off and start fresh tomorrow.

7. Don’t bet on games if the odds have changed too much for your taste. If you like a game that has a spread of 3, only to get to your bookie and find out the odds changed to 4 1/2 ... stay away. It’s no longer the bet you thought it was, and therefore it’s no longer worth betting on. Different betters will give you a different level of variance, but I recommend using a point to point-and-half guideline. But you can determine your own comfort level about how far you’ll let the line move before it becomes a bad bet.

8. This one is called the “Bull Durham” rule after a line in the movie. “Don’t mess with a streak.” If you’re winning, don’t brag aloud to everyone, gloat or do anything to piss off the Betting Gods. Likewise, when you’re losing, don’t cry in your beer or piss and moan. Be like the athletes you’re betting on and try and stay on an even keel. When you win, act like you’ve been there before. When you lose, be mad but determined to do better next time.

9. Since you’re treating this like a job, do what every self-respecting human does whenever possible and take a vacation from betting. Take a week off every now and then to recharge the batteries. If you’re winning, this may go against the previous commandment, but pick and choose the best times of the year to step aside and take a break.

10. The last commandment pisses a lot of bettors off and takes some of the fun out of sports gambling for most, but it’s something you MUST DO to win constantly. DO NOT BET on your favorite team. If you’re honestly going to try and make money, you have to remain unbiased in every way. When you bet on your team, a large percentage of the time your judgment is clouded. Sit back and enjoy their games while looking at the scroll for other scores. If you must, betting on an over/under with said favorite team is a much smarter bet anyway, and easier on the heart and mind.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
How to bet the NBA Playoffs: Handicapper's hoops tips

Be aware of the zig-zag theory

The zig-zag theory is very simple and it's a must-understand component of NBA playoff handicapping. The theory is simple enough: Bet on the team that lost their last game.

The thought process behind the theory is that the team that just lost is likely to dig deep and produce a strong effort, before they fall into a deeper hole. Meanwhile, the team that just won is likely to make fewer adjustments and be a tad bit complacent heading into the next game.

The betting marketplace respects this theory tremendously. That's why you'll normally see a shorter pointspread in the first game following a blowout. In addition, you'll often see the weaker of the two teams favored if they return home facing a 0-2 series deficit after losing the first two games on their opponent's home court.

Sharp bettors know that the zig-zag theory is going to influence pointspreads throughout the postseason. They'll understand why and how the books are making adjustments to the spread from game to game as a series progresses.

Be aware of flaws in the zig-zag theory

The zig-zag theory does very well in competitive series. For a prime example, look at the NBA Finals between the Lakers and Celtics last year, when the straight-up loser of the previous game covered the spread five times in six tries - the lone exception being Boston’s win in Game 5.

But the zig-zag theory tends to fail in less competitive series, where one team has a clear advantage over their opponent. The Atlanta Hawks were a good example of this failure last playoff season. The Hawks went 4-3 ATS in Round 1, covering the spread in all four wins over Milwaukee.

But once Atlanta stepped up in class against Orlando in Round 2, it was downright ugly. The Hawks went 0-4 SU and ATS, with all four defeats coming by double digits against the spread. When there is a confidence differential and/or a talent differential, the zig-zag theory tends to crash and burn.

The theory also fails when a team is simply priced incorrectly by the betting marketplace. Bettors got hammered trying to zig-zag against the Boston Celtics last spring, as Doc Rivers’ squad went 11-3 ATS in their first 14 playoff games en route to series wins over Miami, Cleveland and Orlando.

At the time, bettors just didn't respect the Celtics following their mediocre 27-27 SU run to close out the regular season. Boston finished the regular season ranked 29th out of 30 NBA teams against the spread, ahead of only lowly New Jersey.

When the Celtics flipped the switch in the postseason, their residual ATS value carried them to profits in all four rounds of the playoffs.

Blindly betting the zig-zag theory is a 50/50 proposition at best. The key for bettors is to determine which are the competitive series where the zig-zag will work and which matchups are the mismatch series, where the zig-zag is likely to fail.

Don't overvalue home courts

Every talking head on TV talks about the importance of the home court in the postseason. You'll repeatedly hear nonsense like, "Look for Team A to protect their home court in Game 5." But the home-court edge is already fully factored in to every pointspread in every game.

Playoff teams are here because they can win on the road. The very best teams, that are most likely to win a playoff series or two, tend to have winning records on the road, consistently beating teams in hostile environments.

As we enter the 2011 playoffs, Boston, Chicago, Orlando, Atlanta, Oklahoma City, Los Angeles, San Antonio and Dallas - eight of the 16 playoff teams - finished the regular season above .500 on the highway.

And it’s surely worth noting that sub .500 road playoff teams like New York, Philadelphia, Memphis, Portland and Denver have been pointspread moneymakers on the highway, despite their relative lack of SU success.

The teams that you're most likely to make money with during the postseason are the type of teams that tend to win games and cover spreads in hostile environments. And a home-court edge lessens later in a series when teams have played several previous games on each floor, as matchups and health become bigger issues than the where the game is taking place.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
NBA opening round betting trends and theories

NO. 8 SEEDS ARE BEHIND THE 8-BALL

For the most part, No. 8 seeds in the NBA playoffs are teams that likely scratched and clawed their way into the postseason. Not good enough to be seriously considered threats against top-seeded opponents but just barely better than the dregs of the league.

Rest assured, their life expectancy is not long at all, as they’ve lost nearly 75 percent of time (37-107) in games against No. 1 seeds since 1996. In fact, only the 1996 New York Knicks and the 2007 Golden State Warriors were good enough to pull the rug on top-seeded foes and advance to Round 2 of the playoffs.

Worse, they are 7-32 straight up (SU) and 13-23-3 against the spread (ATS) in the postseason with a losing record in opening round games, including 5-11-1 ATS when taking double digits.

And you can virtually write them off in games against No. 1 seeds that are off back-to-back SU and ATS wins. These guys scratch out of the match with alarming regularity, going 2-22 SU and 6-18 ATS, including 0-14 SU and 1-13 ATS whenever the No. 8 seeds are off a spread loss of more than five points in their last game.

UPSET LOSERS ARE WINNERS


No, it’s not an oxymoron. Instead, it’s a powerful handicapping edge. It occurs whenever a team was upset as a favorite in an opening round game and is at home in the game immediately thereafter.

That’s confirmed by the fact that they are 50-29-2 ATS (4-1 last season), a rock solid number. If they were upset at home in this round and return home they improve to 37-19-2 ATS, including 25-8-1 ATS when squaring off against a No. 3 or higher seed.

Don’t be afraid of these chalkbusters because they don’t lose their composure. Instead they almost always elect to dig down deep and respond with aplomb in games after being embarrassed.

DOUBLE-DIGIT DOGMA


Surprisingly, in the right role, double-digit underdogs do well in opening round contests, especially when playing off a playoff loss. These overweight puppies are 27-14-1 ATS in this role, including 17-6 ATS versus a non-division foe.

These same guys are also 9-1 ATS off a playoff loss of 16 or fewer points.

Granted, these dogs are not exactly pedigree puppies but the fact of the matter is they tend to come up big against disinterested favorites not capable of chopping heavy lumber.

AND DOWN GOES FRAZIER


The psyche of teams that are not playing well comes immediately to the surface during the opening round of the NBA playoffs. That’s evidenced by the fact that teams riding a three game-losing skids are one punch away from being counted out.

With glass jaws, these swirling teams are just 5-25 SU and 7-23 ATS away from home, including 2-11 SU and ATS in openers. They are also 3-18 ATS as underdogs versus .635 or greater opposition when on their way to the canvas.

Worst of all, road dogs of more than six points on a three-game losing skids are 2-18 SU and 3-17 ATS.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
SOME GOOD SIGNS FOR NL IN EARLY INTERLEAGUE ACTION

Though the final tally was a 21-21 split in the first big weekend of Interleague play, there were some good signs for the National League that may foreshadow success the next time the leagues square off.
  • The American League was hosting 8 of the 14 matchups. So, the National League went 21-21 despite playing 24 road games and only 18 home games.
  • The National League won money because of underdog payoffs. So, it's not like the leagues juiced out (split the vigorish) because of the 21-21 mark. If you bet every single NL team this past weekend, you actually made a couple of units. If you bet every single AL team, you lost a few.
  • The only underdog winners of +140 or more were in the National League. They won twice as big dogs Friday, and twice more Saturday. The AL was generally winning the games they were supposed to win anyway. When there was a big market surprise, it was an NL team coming through.
  • Pittsburgh managed to take two of three from Detroit. Florida won two of three from Tampa Bay. Houston won two of three in Toronto. All three of those NL teams had worse records entering the weekend than their AL counterparts.
  • Oh, Colorado and Milwaukee, both potential playoff contenders, missed this first sequence of IL play because there are two extra teams in the NL. Colorado in particular has had some success vs. the AL at home. The NL has a chance to do even better if those teams go into the mix and lesser squads come out in the future rotations.
  • The best teams in the NL were the most impressive. Defending World Champion San Francisco swept Oakland. 2011 favorite Philadelphia took two of three from Texas. St. Louis won two of three on the road at Kansas City. That means the three current divisional leaders in the NL went 7-2 this past weekend. The first place teams in the AL only went 6-3.
  • The last place teams went 3-6, dragged down by the sweep in San Diego. But, the last place teams in the AL were an even worse 2-7 with both Minnesota and Oakland getting swept.
I'm not ready to say that the National League has regained the upper hand at the moment. What's important for you to know is that they may no longer be way behind like they were a few years ago. The NL lost last year's season series mostly because Pittsburgh and Houston were awful in midseason, and they went 5-25 between the two of them. Several NL teams had good record. I think we're going to see that again this year at least with the best of the NL teams.
If there are differences right now, they're minor. And, there is at least some early hope for NL fans that the tide is turning in their favor after a few years of getting pretty badly embarrassed. It's only three days. And, in past years, the AL didn't really didn't really show their stuff until later meetings. Keep monitoring before you draw any firm conclusions. Just be aware that Las Vegas betting edges await anyone who's ahead of the learning curve.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
Nick: What Sharps Think About NFL


Submitted by nick on Wed, 2011-08-03 00:00
DIRECT FROM NEVADA
With Oddsmaker Nick Bogdanovich
NFL REGULAR SEASON WIN TOTALS NOW WIDELY AVAILABLE

More Nevada sportsbooks have posted NFL Regular Season Win Totals now that almost all of the big name free agents have found a home. Those props finally went up offshore since the last time we were together. We now have a chance to read the market to see what sharps (professional wagerers, or "Wise Guys") are thinking about the 2011 season.
With 32 teams to run through, I'm going to break this report into two parts. We'll look at the NFC today…home of that Philadelphia Eagles squad that was getting so much attention this past weekend. Then, I'll come back Friday morning to look at the AFC, where New England is still getting a lot of respect.
NFC EAST
  • Last week the Mirage posted an opener of 10 wins for the PHILADELPHIA EAGLES, with a little extra vigorish on the Over. You had to pay -120 to bet Over 10 at the time. This past weekend saw the Eagles make several big time acquisitions. The players themselves started calling themselves "the Dream Team," which I discussed in my Sunday report. A writer for ESPN made a joke that Vegas wouldn't even accept bets on the Eagles to win the NFC or the Super Bowl because Philly was so obviously the best team in the league. Well, the sharps aren't quite as enthusiastic.
  • Philly's win total is up to 10½ now, with the juice at about -120 or -125 depending on where you shop. The acquisitions were worth half a win according to the market. Not enough to catch Green Bay in the NFC, or New England overall. You'll see when we run through the AFC that Philadelphia is now seen as roughly equivalent to Pittsburgh, who did make it to the Super Bowl last year. The Eagles are a clear threat, but far from a sure thing.
  • The biggest money move in this division has been on the WASHINGTON REDSKINS. The Mirage had them at 6½ wins with -120 juice on the Over. I'm now seeing Under at 6½ wins for as expensive as -210! I'm also seeing 6 wins at -140. So, bad opener for the Skins. The sharps aren't expecting much from this group.
  • Not much action with the NY GIANTS (still at 9½ wins with Under juice) or the DALLAS COWBOYS (either at 9 wins, or 9½ wins with heavy Under vigorish).
NFC NORTH
  • We've seen some shifts in this division. The CHICAGO BEARS went up at 9½ wins last week, but are now only at 8½ wins with some Over vigorish. That's a big move, and reminds you how little sharps think of Jay Cutler!
  • Sharps like the DETROIT LIONS, who are up to 8 wins with under vigorish after opening at 7½ wins with Under vigorish. Sharps really liked Over at 7½ wins, particularly at even money or pick-em.
  • Defending champs the GREEN BAY PACKERS opened at 11½ wins, and are now seeing vigorish on the Under. That tells you that action has been on the Under, but not enough to drive 11½ wins down to 11 wins. Sharps are usually skeptical about defending champions in all sports. That's served them well over the years.
  • The MINNESOTA VIKINGS have been bet up pretty heavily form 6½ wins. If you shop around, you can get 6½ wins but at -150 vigorish. There are 7's out there, and even a 7½ with -160 vig on the Under.
NFC SOUTH
  • The ATLANTA FALCONS are still getting the nod over the NEW ORLEANS SAINTS. But, the distance has tightened up. Last week at the Mirage, Atlanta was 10½ wins, compared to 10 wins with under vigorish for New Orleans. I saw an offshore place that now has them both at 10 wins, with the Falcons at -150 Over, and the Saints at -130.
  • 2010 darkhorse the TAMPA BAY BUCS have been bet down from 8½ wins to 8 wins.
  • The lowly CAROLINA PANTHERS are still at 4½ wins, with little interest in betting on a bad team in transition.
NFC WEST
  • Sharps have been taking some flyers on the ARIZONA CARDINALS since they acquired Kevin Kolb. That's not a surprise. The Cards were at 6 wins last week, but are now at either 6½ pick-em or 7 with Under vigorish.
  • The ST. LOUIS RAMS have also been getting support. They went up at 7 wins, but are now at 7½ wins with about -120 on the Under.
  • Heading down were the SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS and the SEATTLE SEAHAWKS. San Francisco was showing Over vigorish of -120 last week at 8 wins, but is now at Under vigorish of -140 (I'm seeing some 7½'s too). Seattle has fallen all the way from 7 wins down to six wins. Sharps are pessimistic about the quarterback situation with the Seahawks.
Back Friday to run the numbers for the AFC. In short for today…
Sharps liked: Philadelphia, Detroit, Minnesota, New Orleans (a little) St. Louis, and Arizona.
Sharps faded: Washington, Chicago, Green Bay (a little), Atlanta (a little), Tampa Bay, Seattle, and San Francisco.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
CONTINUING OUR LOOK AT NFL WIN TOTALS

The last time we were together we looked at early betting action on regular season win totals for the NFC. As promised, I'm back today to do the same thing for the AFC.
  • AFC EAST
The NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS opened at 11.5 with Under juice last week. But, the acquisitions of Chad Ochocinco and Albert Haynesworth inspired betting action on the Over. The line is still 11.5, which is VERY high for a prop like this already...and the juice is now about -130 on the Over.
We've seen mixed action on the NEW YORK JETS, with the line settling right now around 10 wins. There's been skepticism from sharps for both the MIAMI DOLPHINS and BUFFALO BILLS. Miami opened at 8 wins, but is now either 8 with heavy Under juice (as high as -150 offshore) or 7.5. Buffalo is at 5.5 wins with the Under getting higher vigorish.
  • AFC NORTH
The biggest mistake of the early lines was on the CINCINNATI BENGALS. The Mirage put up 7.5 at first, with a little extra vig on the Over. Many sharps POUNDED the Under because they just didn't see Cincy getting to eight wins. They pounded it again at 7, and at 6.5, and still at 6! I'm seeing Cincinnati at 5.5 wins now with Over vigorish. There's always a danger when you're the first to go up with numbers that a mistake will happen. Sharps are going to find it, and race to your locale to bet it.
The PITTSBURGH STEELERS and BALTIMORE RAVENS are the obvious favorites to win the division. Pittsburgh went up at 11 wins but is now 10.5 most everywhere. Same situation for Baltimore, though there were some sharps still betting the Under at 10.5 wins for the Ravens.
Not much early interest with the CLEVELAND BROWNS, who are at 6.5 wins at the moment.
  • AFC SOUTH
Peyton Manning's neck issues inspired some Under money on the INDIANAPOLIS COLTS. They opened at 10 wins but are now either 9.5 or 10 with Under juice. And, that's lower than normal for the Colts to begin with.
The HOUSTON TEXANS are getting some sharp support, driving an opener of 8 projected wins up to 8.5 wins. Oddsmakers and sharps see this is a fairly weak division this year. Five different"second place" teams in the eight divisions are at 9.5 or higher.
Bringing in Matt Hasselbeck inspired Over money on the TENNESSEE TITANS. They opened at 6.5 wins, but are now either 6.5 with Over juice or 7 with Under juice. There was also some support for the JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS, who opened at 6 wins but are now 6.5 with Under juice. Light support in both of those cases.
  • AFC WEST
There really wasn't a lot of action in the AFC West. And, now that we've finished the cycle, it's clear that the NFC was busier than the AFC outside of the Bengals blown opener. The SAN DIEGO CHARGERS are expected to win the division with 10 victories. That's held fairly solid though I did see a 9.5 with Over juice out there. Last year's champ, the KANSAS CITY CHIEFS opened at 8 wins with Under juice. I'm still seeing either that or 7.5 wins with Over juice.
The OAKLAND RAIDERS have made some negative headlines again (nothing new there!). They've fallen from 7 projected wins to either 7 with Under juice or 6.5 with Over juice. The DENVER BRONCOS are either at 5.5 with Over juice or 6 with Under juice if you want to take a shot on Tim Tebow's team.
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,188
Tokens
[h=1]How Sharps are Betting College Basketball[/h]Professional wagerers have been relatively tentative to this point in the college basketball season. Several factors have lined up to make it difficult for sharps to be truly aggressive in this sport at this point in time.
*The general public doesn’t bet much college basketball until March Madness. There’s marginal interest from squares on weeknight TV games. Things pick up a little on Saturday’s for the big schedules, particularly when marquee teams are playing on TV. But, public money isn’t nearly “the factor” it is during football when evaluating the markets.
Sportsbooks aren’t taking positions against squares. Lines on public favorites may not rise much after the opener because the public is watching rather than betting those teams. A lot of sharp advantages come from either fading the public, or positioning themselves at good numbers amidst public betting strategies. When the public isn’t betting, those possibilities don’t exist.
*Because sportsbooks realize it’s basically oddsmakers vs. sharps right now…and because sportsbooks are afraid of sharps, there’s not a lot on the table to bet aggressively. Some places have greatly reduced Over/Under options (the bread and butter of the new generation of sharps). You probably know that betting limits are much lower in college basketball than they are in football (particularly pro football). Sportsbooks will tolerate some sharp action during football if it helps them balance the books, or if it helps them position themselves against the public with less outright risk. Sportsbooks just don’t want to hand money away to sharps when squares aren’t betting! To be clear, YOU can still bet aggressively with your current bankroll most likely. Sharps with monster bankrolls can't unload.
*While sharps are battling oddsmakers, they’re also battling each other! Lines are moving now at the hint of sharp action. That means if Sharp A bets the opener, Sharp B won’t have a good line to shoot at and will have to pass the game. In an NFL game, if ALL the various individuals and entities like an underdog for example, most of them will be able to get their money down at a decent number. In college basketball, the first responders get the good number and the rest pass.
*We can’t leave out the nature of college basketball this year either. The sport has been trending toward inconsistency in recent seasons because defense is taking control of the paint. You’ve seen a lot of very low scoring games already. If teams hit their treys, scoring is fine. If teams can’t hit their treys, it gets very ugly. Long range shooting is the most random element of the game. That makes pure handicapping a challenge too.
Add it all up, and you get a sport that’s become a bigger challenge to handicap right when feeding opportunities have dwindled because of how sportsbooks defend their cash, and how public betting dwindles in a down economy.
That’s at the heart of why we haven’t been running many “What the Sharps are Betting” articles for college basketball to this point. The battle is neutered. And, honestly, it wouldn’t have helped you much to know!
We will be monitoring sharp action from this point forward, and we’ll make postings when needed. You can count on sharp reports during March Madness, because public money comes back into the mix and the general dynamic is much friendlier to the Wise Guys. Between now and then, we’ll just have to wait and see.
We can tell you this much about recent sharp action. It may influence how you think about picking winners right now in college basketball.
*Some sharps are having great success by riding or fading certain teams. They’ve recognized either a change for the good or a change for the bad that oddsmakers have missed. They’re riding those tendencies until the line catches up. There are so many conferences and teams in this sport, that finding just one example in every other conference will earn you a nice profit over a few weeks.
*Sharps are still focusing on Over/Unders. You may have noticed that the Over/Under in the Duke/Miami game Wednesday Night jumped several points, yet still missed the mark by a huge amount. The biggest edges are available on totals. Study tempos. Study coaching tendencies in terms of aggression or “playing it safe.” Take note of injuries that will take a key scorer or defender off the floor. It’s not much of an exaggeration right now to say that “thinking like a sharp and betting like a sharp” means focusing on college basketball totals in January and February. Oddsmakers have made it clear that they don’t have time to give this proposition justice. You need to hit the sportsbooks at their weakest point if you plan to build your bankroll at this time of year.
*Sharps who use stat databases now have enough of sample size to make truly accurate projections. All teams have played a few conference games, which helps counteract the “garbage in/garbage out) nature of pre-conference play in this sport. The “information” guys bet in November and December up until about Christmas. The stat guys don’t really get aggressive until about now. If you’re into stats yourself, this is a good time to jump in and see if you can swim.
*Sharps are also aware that we’ve reached the point in the season where freshman start to show some maturity in their games. Teams who were very mistake prone out of the gate because they were playing so many newcomers are now starting to get things figured out. We strongly suggest that you run through the teams in your favorite conference, or whatever conference you like to handicap, to see if you can find young teams who are starting to cover spreads because mistakes are down. Oddsmakers tend to stick with team perceptions that are made in the first half of the season. YOU can follow the sharps and adjust on the fly when needed.
*Sharps are betting EARLY in the day. During football, you know the rule of thumb that says you should bet favorites early and underdogs late because the public loves favorites so much. The public isn’t betting right now, particularly in non-TV games. Whether you like a dog or a favorite in college basketball, you should bet as close to the opener as possible. The only exception to this would be if you’re sincerely trying to “fade the sharps.” If you think that the smart money has fallen too much in love with the wrong team in recent games…then let the sharps move that line to give you a more favorable number. This is playing with fire. But, if you’re going to play with fire, college basketball is the sport where you can get away with it. Sharps have been a bit grouchy lately because their team sides haven’t been coming in.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,109,860
Messages
13,463,555
Members
99,490
Latest member
faisalaftab
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com