Anyone watch Pitt this year but me?

Search
Betterthanstocks

Betterthanstocks

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2005
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
They have no offense and a plodding deffense. Time will tick off the clock in this game. It's such a solid under and everyone on the board is thinking over? Why? Someone tell me?

If the Buffs can stop Rutgers so can Pitt. There is no magic there.
 

AlwaysKeen

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,282
Reaction score
0
Wandstet sp? has these guys all screwed up...
 
Betterthanstocks

Betterthanstocks

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2005
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
Please, someone justify the over. Or I stand to lose money.

We all hate unders. They are painful bets. But I can't imagine Pitt scoring 20 and that's what I see they need to do to hit the ov. Also, both teams run (aka) spend clock.
 

CAV

New member
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I agree

Pitt has the worst quarterback I have seen this year. He's a Loser!:party:
 

slowplayer

New member
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
1,272
Reaction score
0
CAV, Palko has struggled a bit with the new system, but he is the same guy who threw for 3000 yards last year with 24-7 TD ratio. Plenty of teams would like to have him.
 
Betterthanstocks

Betterthanstocks

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2005
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
Slow,

I had money against him in game 1, on him in 2 and against him v. Neb.

IMO he’s lost his confidence. Throwing off his back foot unless he has a three step drop.

Please, no one trust me. The line's going against me, but I will drop $ on the under unless something new comes up.
 

ElIguana

Siempre vive RX
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
2,765
Reaction score
0
Betterthanstocks, I am with you all the way, Bro! I have no idea why this line is 48.5 with Pitt's decent defense and horrific offense. The only thing I can figure is it is a televised night game. I'm on the under for 1 unit. GL

P.S. It's only a 1 unit play for me because funny things happen when 2 crappy teams play...they are not as reliable as good teams who give more consistent performances (i.e. turnovers, defensive stability) from week to week.
 
DaddyDank

DaddyDank

New member
Joined
Sep 18, 2005
Messages
1,128
Reaction score
0
I am on Pitt and the Under...I think they are both solid bets...
 
BC-Eagles

BC-Eagles

New member
Joined
Sep 29, 2005
Messages
2,040
Reaction score
0
I like Pitt a lot, not gonna touch the O/U
 
JinnRikki

JinnRikki

New member
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Messages
7,379
Reaction score
1
Wanny can usually get his teams up 1 or 2 times a year, this will be one. The under will be gold because as long as Wanny has a lead of any kind he goes into his shell until he's behind again then does enough to regain the lead. The only thing that scares me is this idiot plays "prevent defense" when he is up by a FG.
 
Heatwave

Heatwave

Life is Good
Joined
Nov 21, 1999
Messages
8,889
Reaction score
70
I agree with the under play here...Pitt defense not getting the credit it deserves, and offense is...well, underachieving.

I think Pitt is the play here tonight, though.

HW
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,141,332
Messages
13,918,444
Members
104,800
Latest member
nh2362995
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com