here's what i don't get: last year, before anybody knew KU was going to be world beaters, the spread vs. FIU was -35 and KU won by 52.
now, this year, with everybody seeing what KU did last year and how good they are supposed to be again in 2008 the spread is only -36.
last year, ku scored td's on a blocked punt and a 100 yard int return by talib. FIU had 3 fumbles lost, 2 ints, and KU only punted once. this is all info that most people won't look at, just the margin of victory.
also, the line opened at 37 and has come down in a game that looks like a total blow-out based on last year's performance. something seems very fishy to me here.
plus, kelso sturgeon is very high on KU this year and is advertising a 100 unit game on saturday that he says wins by 50 points. i'd bet he is on KU (FL has too many injuries to be the pick in week 1).
that's a lot of reasons to fade the jayhawks. thoughts from big 12 country???