Anyone else see that last shot from SJU before half?

[Jetplane]

They reviewed... and actually said he beat the shot clock???? WTF!!!! It had no implications on lines because they already covered the 1H but ummmmm... what? You even reviewed and called it good? How? It was nearly a full second late getting out of his hands.

 

[tenman]

I guess the rule is that you can review if a shot beat the shot clock only in the last 2 minutes of the game. If it was the game clock, they could have reviewed it.

 

[Ilovetobet]

Yeah shot was way late.

 

[bones1980]

Duke should of got ball with 3.3 left ! I have the over so needed that

 

[Jetplane]

Duke should of got ball with 3.3 left ! I have the over so needed that

Exactly.

Yeah shot was way late.

The refs would have to have been blind and deaf at the same time to miss this call.

I guess the rule is that you can review if a shot beat the shot clock only in the last 2 minutes of the game. If it was the game clock, they could have reviewed it.

I wonder what the rule is for deciding if its a 2 or 3 pt'er also... just start calling every shot a 3 and stick it with--sounds legit.

 

[RussellPeters]

That was clearly in his hand. Shot clock was over but game clock still had 3 seconds. SJ should not have got those 3 points. Moot point as justice was served as Duke ended up covering the game happy happy