Anti Immigration & Illegal Immigration Info - Ongoing Thread

Search
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
44,534
Tokens
  1. NEWS

Duffy X post: 1,500 truckers placed out of service for language violation​

user-gravatar Headshot
David Hollis (TN)
Aug 1, 2025
Updated Aug 5, 2025
Screenshot 2025 08 01 At 9 46 33 Am

Enforcement of the new English language proficiency requirement for truckers continues apace since being enacted a bit more than a month ago.
Proof of that came in the form of a posting on "X" (formerly Twitter) by Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy.
On Wednesday, Duffy posted:
"Since I took action to enforce language proficiency requirements for truckers, our state partners have put roughly 1,500 unqualified drivers out of service. That’s what I call results!
"If you can't read or speak our national language — ENGLISH — we won’t let your truck endanger the driving public.
"America First = Safety First"
The enforcement comes after the language requirement became an out of service violation June 25.
Before that, an executive order by President Donald Trump directed the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to rescind a 2016 memo that ordered law enforcement to not place truck drivers out-of-service for English language violations.
The Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance's board voted to add “English Proficiency” to its North American standard out-of-service criteria.
The change in language enforcement also comes after another Trump executive order declaing English as the official language of the U.S.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
44,534
Tokens
ADKq_NY9YY_iMXL08qEWczfMGAVZd4X7O_UIE9DN6NZNflZ5w9VdaJG6XCV8ZHmdY7cRqSfzhHa2bZv7os7_81kQaTx306cjzPXVkaQEe5syCluEhhaKZqhB8hcAazdbaRf2ZmdIrrfDQBnSt3TWw1dGl5cRB8zKaq3ytsdCO73VOEbY5gZKbhH_Q26oSTdZ2wtKr1bWceJIeTjUmnB1c1KNCdLFPeVtEWtwclaQg95p6IU=s0-d-e1-ft
July 24 was Earth Overshoot Day, the day each year when humanity’s demands on nature exceed the capacities of the biosphere to provide resources and assimilate our wastes. Here at NumbersUSA, we support reducing the mass immigration driving our continued population growth. Lowering immigration to a sustainable level would allow us to push America’s overshoot day closer to the end of the year. Below we share water news from the arid southwest, as well as our new population projection tool. But we begin with an issue that has been much in the news recently.


Negative Net Migration

"We may be dealing with NEGATIVE NET MIGRATION to the United States in 2025!” exclaimed chief data analyst Harry Enten, in a recent report on CNN. “That would be the first time there is negative net migration in this country in at least 50 years — we're talking about down from 2.8 million in 2024."

“Net migration” is the number of people entering a country minus those leaving it (excluding guest workers and those coming or going for short, temporary stays). Net annual migration into the U.S. reached its highest levels in history during the Biden administration. Most of the increase resulted from illegal immigration, which tripled in just a few years.

The Trump administration came into office determined to crack down on illegal immigration. Illegal crossings at the southern border are way down, formal deportations have increased, and a less permissive legal landscape seems to have led to hundreds of thousands of informal “self-deportations.” Still, legal immigration remains as high as ever, around 1.2 million annually, making actual net negative migration unlikely.
ADKq_NZl8PfeX3CYfZreY7R8eEKgRxU9AiWAaiSGY5dY3xWZC0bUM9W4PnEyeqFZ2ZncJB7LsfJyI_49IL-6TdeISZNM6rBlFIOLySBtEEhe1Y_MI5zc2jA4KQedmD3CmR0KF34C6umafluOcL36QQSjM09bowF_B8Pi_9Td2qHjYu2G5CmLHpwECYS2MJAnE7NT-Ru8kGbpOSvf-fR7SvltYHP6PE8pFo0RWO3nRz2Ytzk=s0-d-e1-ft
Despite sensational headlines, the Trump administration’s enforcement actions are unlikely to result in more people leaving the U.S. than coming in. According to theFederal Reserve Bank of San Francisco: “Net migration levels for 2025 are currently on track to be around 1.0 million — 1.6 million less than in 2024 and 2.5 million less than in 2023." This reduced immigration will be a good thing, since America obviously couldn’t sustain immigration at the numbers we saw over the last few years without significant negative impacts.

A Necessary Course Correction

Lower immigration numbers, and even a few years of net negative migration into the U.S., would be beneficial for several reasons.

First, after four years of lax immigration enforcement, our nation needed a reset. It was imperative to re-establish commonsense limits to immigration and the idea that following U.S. immigration laws is not a suggestion, but mandatory.

Second, decreased immigration benefits American workers, both native and foreign-born. While most job growth in recent years accrued to new foreign-born workers, during the past half year all the job growth measured went to native-born workers. Lowering immigration also drives up wages, for all workers. Recent articles in the business press express worry about decreased immigration leading to “increasing wage inflation” and “upward wage pressures for some groups of workers." These are just mainstream economists’ terms for what regular people call "higher wages for my friends and neighbors."

Third, lowering immigration is good for the environment. Immigration-driven population growth makes all our environmental problems more difficult, and ultimately impossible, to solve. A difference of a few million new immigrants each year, more or less, might seem unimportant within an overall U.S. population of 340 million. But as shown in the graph below, relatively small annual population increases lead to big increases in total numbers in just a few years.
The difference between projecting out 1 million and 2.8 million annual net migration is immense: a population in 2100 of 370 million versus one of 591 million! It also makes the difference between a population that has leveled out and stopped growing, and one that continues to gallop relentlessly upward.

Create Your Own Population Projections!

“Recent Immigration Surge Has Been Largest in U.S. History,” boomed an article in the New York Times last year. Net immigration levels under the Biden administration reached nearly three million annually, driving the highest U.S. population growth in decades, according to the Census Bureau, and putting us on pace to nearly double the population by the end of the century.

Numbers matter! To show just how much, NumbersUSA has created the new population projection tool below. Move the sliders to set annual numbers for legal and illegal immigration, then see for yourself how that changes future population numbers. By moving your cursor along the projection line, you can see total population numbers for any year between 1950 and 2100. We think you’ll be impressed by how relatively small changes in annual immigration can cumulate, leading to BIG changes to our future population.
Recent variations in U.S. immigration levels have been due primarily to federal policy changes. Legal immigration under Congressionally mandated programs has stayed relatively stable at around 1.2 million annually since the last major increases in the early 1990s. What changed most dramatically during the past decade have been decreased (Trump) and increased (Biden) tolerance for illegal immigration, an immense surge in bogus political asylum applications by economic migrants, and new “temporary” parole programs bringing in several million people from distressed nations. Such policy changes have important demographic impacts, as you can see by comparing the following three scenarios:

Holding fertility and mortality rates steady across all three scenarios, we first graph a “status quo” of 1.5 million annual net migration, the average over the eight administrations of the past five U.S. presidents from 1992 to the present. Projected forward, this immigration level leads to substantial population growth over this century, from 282 million in 2000 to 485 million in 2100. That’s an increase of more than 200 million people.
We then compare this scenario to one phasing in the immigration levels recommended by the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform (1997) (commonly known as the Jordan Commission) (300,000 annual net) and one setting annual net immigration at the highest level reached under the Biden administration (approximately 3 million in 2023). The Jordan Commission recommendations, endorsed by NumbersUSA, would reduce immigration levels substantially, while leaving room for bringing in exceptional workers, genuine political refugees, and spousal reunification. The Biden administration’s numbers for 2023 provide a real world high-migration comparison to the status quo.
As you can see, implementing the Jordan Commission’s immigration levels would lead to a 2.5% decline in population over the next seventy-five years, from 340 million to 327 million — essentially stabilizing the U.S. population at 2018 levels. Locking in the highest immigration levels reached during the Biden administration would more than double the population, which would reach 683 million in 2100 with no end to growth in sight.

These three policy scenarios are all plausible and they all have their advocates. But they put the United States on three very different population trajectories: stability, rapid growth, or very rapid growth. They differ in their 2100 population projections by 356 million – more than the entire U.S. population today!

What do you think the United States’ annual immigration level should be? Explore possible answers with our new population projection tool. Then make sure your elected representatives know what you think!
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
44,534
Tokens
Water News

Immigration Intensifies Nevada’s Water Supply Crisis


Nevada receives the least rainfall and is the driest state in America, yet it has one of the fastest growing populations. As our study shows, it’s no surprise Nevada is facing critical water supply shortages. As more people move into Nevada’s urban centers, the demand for water has risen sharply. While conservation efforts have slowed the rate of water use per capita, the sheer magnitude of new residents, primarily international migrants, continues to place onerous demands on the state’s water supplies.

Nevada’s population has grown dramatically over the past several decades. From 1980 to 2020, the state’s population nearly quadrupled, driven primarily by migration to southern Nevada (home to Las Vegas). In 2023, Nevada reached 3.2 million people, with 72% of that growth coming from international migration -- the highest level in over a decade. Much of the rest comes from residents fleeing overcrowded, overpriced California. All this growth has put extraordinary demands on Nevada’s falling groundwater levels and dwindling surface waters.
ADKq_NZCItvzuOsyw_H2EqzzlWWFOR1cY7MW_5HwQ7VjKtEj4Sdq0hSy2hXlCFya4Q5OvtY5ouPWERInBNX-Io2w62kinFtKviYmWRCUG--ahfMJxX37iD_b3YoH0xJgSN8XriQWFuc3fUOvK8bksSWKV_2BfmtJU-YMUi6DIasHErHpjN5f24qzNRTvsDPDIiK2MJp_sVrOyrMG2xyb3hKoO4LFcdE3sutH82qNxd8w8aw=s0-d-e1-ft
Southern Nevada is home to over 75% of Nevada’s total population and gets about 90% of its water from the Colorado River, which is being severely overused and is diminishing due to prolonged drought. In response to surface waters running low, communities pump more from underground aquifers. But this led to many of Nevada’s groundwater basins being overdrawn (i.e., more water is pumped out than nature can replace). Water managers are left with only bad choices: divert water from the state’s farmlands, further over-pump aquifers, or drain rivers beyond their ability to sustain the wildlife that depend on them.

Growing Numbers, Shrinking Reservoirs

Nevada faces complex challenges with water rights and legal conflicts due to over-allocated groundwater basins, and growing demands from urban, agricultural, and tribal stakeholders. Climate change is already reducing rainfall in the Rockies and flows in the Colorado River, with more decreases projected to come. Competition for surface waters has become an intense challenge, especially due to the state's disjointed regulatory framework, divided among state and federal agencies and coordinated by interstate agreements like the Colorado River Compact. As drought conditions persist, and population and development pressures grow, these legal and institutional tensions are becoming more difficult to resolve.
ADKq_NaNsDzwFssdheWcu_jOn9Yq-7D1iJy86Thw_xhbZfxI75vfzUhJzJfgdrkjR291Wvr9y-DMOBFSeehaUnDJ-r86ixVdBL75Z1r177CJ_rS77X9quPB_vv5XOVTVh81YWACOmmX75r93Uoxe3dMBSnz2vlDiZUUTJZxyiA0gkZlJvvSSx-y4KFP_3PwU2xZ3lPV4Cb8pBhXzJgYTDUEJ4Ep3QeR-kKPG-ijBJtACy7U=s0-d-e1-ft
Nevada’s water supply problems are inextricably tied to its rapid population growth. Urban and rural demands, over-withdrawal of groundwater, and ecological degradation are all worsening under the stress of a fast-growing population.

Nevada’s leaders and citizens need to recognize that environmental limits make endless population growth impossible. As they and other states reckon with those limits, leaders at the federal level should embrace policies that make practical sense. Hoping for the best is no longer a viable approach. Ending population growth, while promoting prudent water resource management, are the only ways to avoid catastrophic water shortages in the future.

Thirsty for Growth: How Arizona Is Trading Water for Sprawl

In June 2025, the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) imposed a moratorium on new building permits for subdivisions in some areas in and around Phoenix, after new groundwater models revealed insufficient supply to support further development. Senate Bill 1611 — the so-called “Ag-to-Urban Groundwater Conservation Program” — was passed one month later specifically to override that moratorium, allowing developers to substitute “groundwater credits” for proof of physical water availability. This workaround allows unsustainable growth to continue, under the guise of conservation.

SB 1611 allows farmers near Phoenix to permanently relinquish their irrigation rights, dewatering farms to effectively circumvent the moratorium imposed by ADWR. Real estate interests understood the stakes. “This will alleviate some of that pressure … now they can get their certificates of assured water supply,” one industry leader explained. Another said bluntly, “this will be good for us”, capturing the law’s underlying purpose of serving developers, not the public or the environment.

Governor Katie Hobbs hailed the bill as an “historic bipartisan deal.” But behind the bipartisan triumphalism is a growing ecological deficit. Arizona’s leaders remain unwilling to limit growth, even as water becomes scarcer, rivers dry up, and farms and native species are displaced.
ADKq_NaU4sHgQa3S6nU2M4ui50srFwa1pkfOoHX4lS6LwCkr39zA9t5sz7c7no37vzlBaSlf52Sp3cFhj0Rb3Ct5ckN3HM6wZQ34z-z8HIiN64nUPMIZD7lHP66xd1t9ob4zg-dWxjGWv5h5sjDtEuevG5wIn8ltAw_AUxKP1_q-xVdvCdcDRR3h2sVkplL-1TVmBOQDgFJIQ-E8bM0EkdHs_62AV2rfNJEfUY2XKjyrG6w=s0-d-e1-ft
SB 1611 accelerates this displacement. With an estimated 425,000 acres of farmland eligible for conversion, it could enable up to one million new homes at suburban densities. That means bulldozing productive farmland, removing natural vegetation, and consuming ever more water to support lawns, pools, and golf courses in arid zones where the groundwater is already depleted. As a result, habitat destruction will increase, wildlife will lose access to water and migratory corridors, and aquifer depletion will accelerate. Human expansion continues to push other species aside — and the politicians responsible refuse to acknowledge the tradeoffs.

Our study of Arizona sprawl reveals a simple truth: no amount of policy tinkering can solve Arizona’s water crisis if population growth continues. Every new home, every new subdivision, every new resident increases total demand for water — not just for household use, but for electricity, food, transportation, and landscaping
ADKq_NZoCKrROPwHfU3096bSniTtZN70sOo-pOSJjbwySf74-53CqvEZ2BFbxheqYMqmJeN2NRI2aG71ausQZD1V7n1EVhMFx3y3uFcYAiQr2e6WUpsTBx9CMnHNkPar-Moq9s4aH1gLO6UY_fmtK4HwZa1z2jNd40S3n78XZtS1UhELar6o19kgc7hFKLcvmjTdkEbwyDHgffF7Y06zEiMXfjjEFuy1bfxKaY35yqpgrhw=s0-d-e1-ft
What Can We Do?

Political leaders in Arizona, Nevada, and elsewhere in the arid southwestern U.S. may continue to celebrate growth, but reality will impose its own limits. The aquifers will run dry. The rivers will stop flowing (as many already have). The land will no longer support the people pouring into it. If we are serious about securing a sustainable future, we must confront the truth: water conservation alone is not enough. We must end population growth — in Nevada and Arizona, and across the United States.

That means saying “no” to more sprawl, ending unsustainable economic practices, and shifting federal immigration policy toward population stabilization. Without those changes, every new policy — no matter how well-intentioned — will be undone by sheer numbers. As long as growth continues, so will the water crisis in the American southwest.

NumbersUSA’s “Six Great Solutions” are legislation that will help curb illegal immigration and reduce legal immigration to levels that create a more thriving, egalitarian, and sustainable society. Visit our Action Board to support Congressional legislation to stop using immigration to force population growth. Thanks in advance for your support, and if you’d care to send items for inclusion in this newsletter, please send them to Philip Cafaro at philipjcafaro@gmail.com.

Thank you for all that you do,

Phil Cafaro
Sustainability Advisory Chair

Screenshot 2025-07-22 172729
DONATE .......................................... Join www.NumbersUSA.com
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,134,038
Messages
13,809,477
Members
104,042
Latest member
roseshalia68
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com