Another Hypocrate: Obama to Ramp Up Drug War

Search

New member
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
7,373
Tokens
Change Bitches!

[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]US to ramp up intel efforts in drug war

[/FONT]The United States will step up intelligence efforts aimed at stemming the illicit flow of drugs, guns and cash across the border with Mexico, according to a White House strategy paper soon to be sent to Congress.
The strategy, drawn up by the Office of National Drug Control Policy, calls for wide-ranging improvements to intelligence gathering and analysis that can be used by law enforcement units.
"Agencies should consider deploying additional intelligence analysts from headquarters-type roles into frontline operational organizations to facilitate the linking of intelligence to operations," the report said.
"Law enforcement customers in the counternarcotics and homeland security communities need 'actionable' intelligence. Greater emphasis must be placed on ensuring that intelligence products contain valid operational links or leads."
The report noted that in coming years, "the focus of these intelligence programs will be on improving and integrating the flow of timely and relevant intelligence and analysis."
The strategy comes amid fears that Mexico's bloody drug war may spill over the border and terrorists could use drug routes to carry out an attack on the United States.
"The routes and methods of existing smuggling organizations could potentially be utilized to transport terrorists or weapons of terror across the border," the 77-page report warns.
Mexican drug cartels have become ever-stronger in recent years as they tighten their grip on lucrative trade routes to the United States -- the world's largest consumer of cocaine.
In 2008, an estimated 6,000 people were killed in Mexico in drug-related violence, as cartels fought each other over turf and with the government, which has enlisted the army in a bid to overpower the gangs.
Mexican and Colombian cartels make an estimated 18-39 billion dollars in drug proceeds each year according to US estimates.
The strategy, which was announced on Friday, is part of President Barack Obama's vow to step up US efforts to combat the trade across the southwestern US border, amid criticism from Mexico than much of the cash and weapons used by cartels come from the United States.
It calls for US agencies to "enhance coordination of intelligence sharing with Mexico," including tip-offs from financial crimes agencies on both sides of the border.
One proposed measure is the reestablishment of a inter-agency group -- led by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) -- that would oversee how intelligence is managed.
Much of the document focuses on improving the flow of sensitive information between the myriad of often competing US government departments.
It also deals with the logistical and technical challenge of monitoring the 43 legal -- and scores of illegal -- border crossings that pock the frontier between the two countries.
The strategy would see an increased focus on technology, with a host of detection devices and databases being used interdict traffickers and their cargo.
One particular target for new technology is the cartel's use of underground transportation tunnels, which could also be used to transport weapons for a terrorist attack.
"Subterranean passages represent a unique and growing threat to the homeland," the report states.
According to US government figures 24 such tunnels were discovered in 2008, including one which "had ventilation, drainage, and lighting systems, as well as a cement floor and a pulley system."




[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]
[/FONT]
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
This move sponsored by the ONDCP is not a hypocritcal contradiction to anything proposed by Barack Obama when he was running for office.

While most of us realize the futility and even counterproductive results of spending valuable federal resources on such hopeless efforts to "battle" the multi-billion dollar per year illicit drug marketeers, neither Obama nor anyone in his camp have ever stated that ending the "Drug War" is a great idea.

We can only hope that as marijuana laws continue to become more reasonable within the USA (as they have been steadily since the year 2000), the ability of the Mexican drug cartels to market their usually substandard cannabis product will recede.

President Obama has done nothing in his first five months to give anyone legitimate concern that domestic enforcement of marijuana Prohibition will escalate. Indeed, he's already taken steps to help assure a reduced interference by the pigs at the DEA to inhibit legal access to medical marijuana for patients who live in the 14 states which currently permit such access.

--Bman PPub post for June 7
 

New member
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
7,373
Tokens
Obama is a hippocrate because he was a heavy drug user when he was younger.


This move sponsored by the ONDCP is not a hypocritcal contradiction to anything proposed by Barack Obama when he was running for office.

While most of us realize the futility and even counterproductive results of spending valuable federal resources on such hopeless efforts to "battle" the multi-billion dollar per year illicit drug marketeers, neither Obama nor anyone in his camp have ever stated that ending the "Drug War" is a great idea.

We can only hope that as marijuana laws continue to become more reasonable within the USA (as they have been steadily since the year 2000), the ability of the Mexican drug cartels to market their usually substandard cannabis product will recede.

President Obama has done nothing in his first five months to give anyone legitimate concern that domestic enforcement of marijuana Prohibition will escalate. Indeed, he's already taken steps to help assure a reduced interference by the pigs at the DEA to inhibit legal access to medical marijuana for patients who live in the 14 states which currently permit such access.

--Bman PPub post for June 7
 

Everything's Legal in the USofA...Just don't get c
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
2,199
Tokens
How do you define heavy drug user?

He said that he smoked pot regularly, and used "blow" whenever he could afford it. Had he been caught in the drug war net to which he is subjecting millions of others, his life would have been ruined and he would never have had a prayer of being elected President.

Doesn't get more hypocritical than that.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
9,491
Tokens
"How do you define heavy drug user?"


Anyone that uses more than I. Same as heavy drinker.
 

"Here we go again"
Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Messages
4,507
Tokens
So did JFK, Bill Clinton, and GW Bush.




Due to the fact they are all the same mold and merely puppets. Of course they will continue the same ridiculous policies. I was the one, along with nimue and all other informed citizens who said before Obama got elected that he will continue to give the private bankers trillions, continue the Iraq war, continue indefinite detention of individuals not charged with the crime, and continue the drug war.


How did we know this? We simply know how these criminals operate.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
12,563
Tokens
that was fricking 25 years ago lol. people grow up, plus obama admitted what he did was wrong.

this being amped up is good.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
The Mexican drug cartels have perhaps committed a grievious tactical error by moving away from more traditional corruption of law enforcement and elected officials and towards a more overtly violent, and essentially military attempt at controlling Mexico in the 21st century.

While it's certain that neither the US, nor Mexico, nor any combination can thwart the production and distribution of illicit drugs either domestically or internationally, it's equally certain that even the Mexican cartels are not likely to hold up to a countering force that includes US military.

Now that was fairly acceptable (to the USA) when the shit was taking place way down in Colombia or over in Afghanistan. But drug cartel paramilitary actions in Mexico are pushing hard on the southern states of the USA and most certainly merit more intense attention.

The most likely outcome of this newest "new" strategy is that the Mexican cartels will begin to reroute their product through different channels and perhaps even have a modest reduction in traffic that goes directly across the US/Mexican border.

And with that will come at least some reduction in the direct and violent tactics they've been using for the past two to three years in cities closest to that border.

But make no mistake. Barring an end to US 21st century Prohibition on marijuana (and/or a significant reduction in enforcing criminal laws against marijuana), they'll still be just as financially powerful and they will still get as much product into the US as they wish.

They can only be defeated financially by open and essentially unfettered competition by US growers and dealers. And that only happens where pot is legalized or it is decriminalized and accompanying criminal enforcement becomes a drastically lower priority.

In the meantime, it's dog & pony show by Washington and a lot of other people at the state level. And sadly, much of it is very sincere and very well intended.

But we all know neither elected officials nor law enforcement officers are likely to be honest and just face up to the fact that if someone wants to get drugs, guns or "terrorism tools" into the USA, there's really not shit that anyone can do to stop them.

We can inhibit any of the above, but as long as there's US mail and hundreds of legitimate shipping services transporting literally millions of packages internationally every few days, suggesting it can be slowed by more than a few percent is incredibly dishonest.


Finally, my earlier Reply and this one both take issue with the notion that President Obama is "ramping up" the Drug War.

He's not doing anything more than have his past four predecessors and as I noted in my first Reply, he's given some pretty decent indicators that on the domestic front, he's not overtly concerned with perpetuating the past 30+ years of DEA-driven domestic strategies, nor perpetuating the past 40+ years of incredible racial disparities connected to enforcement of domestic drug laws.

Bman LateNight PPub post - June 7
 

Everything's Legal in the USofA...Just don't get c
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
2,199
Tokens
Can't argue with much of that, Barman.

But I'm a little bemused by your characterization of the policy as "DEA driven". True, they have a vested interest in continuing this policy, but do you really think they are the ones driving this train wreck?

BTW - have you ever watched "Breaking Bad"? Good stuff.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
MT, my use of the gloss "DEA-driven" was in reference to the federal drug policies, which is where President Obama is most directly affiliated.

State and local enforcement of laws pertaining to illicit drugs are certainly driven by other forces, but in the past 15 years they've received the bulk of their boost from federal matching funds and/or federal donations of excess military hardware. Thus explaining why numerous towns across the USA with populations under 50,000 have fully geared paramilitary SWAT teams.

Once the feds back off of heretofore steadily increasing domestic "drug war", the state and locals will have little choice but to follow suit because they will not be able to financially support such enforcement without federal underwriting in both money and manpower.

====
Have not seen Breaking Bad, but it certainly looks like a good one to add to my Netflix queue for future DVD watching in full season formats.


---Bman MidDay PPub post for June 8


(You fellas not making it easy for me to adhere to my self-imposed "one post per day")
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,788
Messages
13,573,035
Members
100,866
Latest member
tt88myy
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com