al-jazeera privatisation muzzle due soon

Search
eek.

eek.

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Reaction score
4
The Arab equivalent of the BBC with more influence than any other Arab brand, started in....1996.

It was nice while it lasted though.
The Saudis will buy it up and squish it.
RIP al-jazeera.

-----------------------------------------------

QATAR: Al-Jazeera sale a big deal for Arab audiences



Arabs fear the sale of their only free-press station to private owners will interfere with editorial independence



The Straits Times
Monday, February 14, 2005

The US government may view Al-Jazeera as little more than an anti-American mouthpiece, but the journalists who work at the satellite TV station consider it the only free-press bastion in an authoritarian Middle East.

And nowadays, the prospect of being sold to the highest bidder has many deeply worried.

An order by the ruler of this small Persian Gulf country to come up with a privatisation plan for the pan-Arab station - owned and funded by the Qatari government since the station's inception in 1996 - has many wondering who will buy, and what the station will look like in the future.

'Our editorial policy is the red line,' station director Wadah Khanfar said in a recent interview.

'The moment we feel the privatisation issue will interfere with our editorial policy, the project will be abandoned.'

Not everyone is so sure.

At the station's headquarters here, many employees have begun expressing fears that privatisation could effectively destroy the station as an independent news source for Arab viewers, this according to a senior editor speaking on condition of anonymity because of the issue's sensitivity.

Few details are known about the privatisation plan, or why the Qatari government is pushing it.

The idea has been under discussion for more than a year, Al-Jazeera executives say, but gained momentum when this kingdom's emir, Sheik Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, ordered the government to produce a plan on how to turn the channel into a private shareholding company.

Mr Khanfar said a final report on privatisation was recently presented to the station's board of directors.

He would not release details, except to say the board would meet within the next few weeks to discuss it.

It is widely expected that the station will be listed on Qatar's stock market, with most shares available for purchase only by Qatari nationals and citizens from Gulf Cooperation Council countries and a minority stake open to foreign investors.

Saudis, who already own many of the Arab world's media companies, would be eligible to buy under those rules, as their country is part of the GCC.

The station has a wide audience across the Arab world but it has also been heavily criticised by governments, including Saudi Arabia's, mostly because - unlike most Arab state-run media outlets - Al-Jazeera airs the views of local opposition figures and has been unafraid to broadcast their criticisms of their countries' rulers.

http://www.asiamedia.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=20722

http://www.gulfnews.com/Articles/RegionNF.asp?ArticleID=149966

http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/qatar/?id=12573

http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/media/2005/0215aljazeera.htm
 
eek.

eek.

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Reaction score
4
One for you X.

Canadian authorities were criticised for ordering the channel
to be monitored 24 hours a day, and making distributors responsible
for making sure "abusive comments" were edited out before broadcast.

Watchdog blasts al-Jazeera bans
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4215199.stm


Stuff like this doesn't make them popular...

[font=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif]Many Iraqis killed in US air attack[/font]

<TABLE id=tblAuthorTable style="MARGIN: 0px" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0><TBODY><TR></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<!-- always make sure the
above is right next to the asp:img closing tag with -->Tuesday 12 April 2005

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/09413EAB-D8E4-4C03-A52C-BD7118AC9946.htm
 
Last edited:
eek.

eek.

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Reaction score
4
In defence of al-jazeera.By Michael Moran
[font=Arial, Trebuchet MS, Helvetica]MSNBC[/font]

http://www.msnbc.com/news/643471.asp?cp1=1

That brings us to the final lesson here: what passes for news in America. For the past 10 years, roughly since the idiotic O.J. Simpson trial, the language of marketing has entered American newsrooms like a badly targeted cruise missile. Talk of plot lines and demographics, sexiness and “water-cooler” appeal have polluted a mission that is protected by its own constitutional amendment. Celebrity journalists interview celebrity dimwits about their sex lives, while American foreign policy is left running on auto-pilot.

-------------------------

Al-J rose out of the ashes of the BBC arab service...now I wonder why the BBC got rid of it. hmmm.

Aint freedom a bítch.
 
DarrylParsons

DarrylParsons

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,412
Reaction score
0
Eek,

Since you are a genius, I assume you will be able to explain the following to me...

Al Jazeera being free and independent is better than it being biased, right? Here I mean better for its population of viewers.

In a free market, if A is better than B and their supply is the same, then A will fetch a higher price than B, right? In other words, people will be willing to pay more for A than for B.

Therefore, people are willing to pay more for an independent Al Jazeera than a biased one, no?

Greedy capitalists want to make as much money as possible, right?

So if a greedy capitalist bought Al Jazeera, wouldn't he be wise to offer what the people will pay the most for?

Yet you say a greedy capitalist will fvck it up by making the programming worse. How do you explain this apparent contradiction?


I have a theory...it is that what people SAY they want and what they REALLY want (measured by how they spend their money) are two very different things. Capitalism assures that people get what they REALLY want while governments do their best to give them what they SAY they want.

Any comments on this overall theory of mine?
 
DarrylParsons

DarrylParsons

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,412
Reaction score
0
So in this particular case the greedy capitalists who would otherwise finance the BBC-like Al Jazeera are being stifled by their governments. And since you are a BBC fan, am I understanding correctly that you are siding with the capitalists and against their governments on this one?
 
eek.

eek.

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Reaction score
4
hehe.

I reckon the capitalists and Governments are on the same team where Al-J is concerned.

Of course there might be a capitalist with a decent set hanging between his legs who would take A-J on and run with it.
You found any capitalists with huge brassy balls yet?

here's one...alas...he's no longer a going concern.
 
DarrylParsons

DarrylParsons

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,412
Reaction score
0
So you rejoice when you see that no single individual is more powerful than the beast created by hundreds of millions banding together?

Your article says that the local capitalists would have saved A-J if not for their fear of their own government. That doesn't look like being on the same side to me.
 
eek.

eek.

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Reaction score
4
C'est la vie

Once America and the American people embrace freedom and democracy in the ME, instead of just giving it lip service, capitalists can jump on the Al-J bandwagon too!
 
xpanda

xpanda

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Reaction score
4
Darryl Parsons said:
Al Jazeera being free and independent is better than it being biased, right?

Why do you assume that a privately owned Al Jazeera would be unbiased?
 
DarrylParsons

DarrylParsons

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,412
Reaction score
0
eek. said:
C'est la vie

Once America and the American people embrace freedom and democracy in the ME, instead of just giving it lip service, capitalists can jump on the Al-J bandwagon too!

Well, I think if you give the people of the ME true freedom, a number of things could come out of it but democracy is certainly not one of them. America knows that and that's why they got the guns pointing at them continuously.

It's a different culture over there. If it were egalitarian, men wouldn't be able to have multiple wives and women would have balls like in America.
 
DarrylParsons

DarrylParsons

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,412
Reaction score
0
xpanda said:
Why do you assume that a privately owned Al Jazeera would be unbiased?

Where did I assume that? :icon_conf
 
eek.

eek.

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Reaction score
4
Because that would [apparently] bring in the most cash, because it gets the most viewers if it's unbiased.
i.e. It makes economic sense.

Capitalism is the free-est freedom money can buy.
(Just ask your boss at wal-mart)
All new wal-mart employees now get a free pet squirrel to stroke and hug at work too apparently.
bien.gif
 
Last edited:
xpanda

xpanda

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Reaction score
4
Darryl Parsons said:
Where did I assume that?

Al Jazeera being free and independent is better than it being biased, right?

Right there. You made the two states - free & independent and biased - seem like they were mutually exclusive. Certainly AJ can be free and independent and biased, no? Think Rupert Murdoch.
 
eek.

eek.

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Reaction score
4
he meant 'free and independent' = unbiased

versus biased

"Al Jazeera being free and independent[unbiased] is better than it being biased, right?"


...i need some beer
 
DarrylParsons

DarrylParsons

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
5,412
Reaction score
0
xpanda said:
Right there. You made the two states - free & independent and biased - seem like they were mutually exclusive. Certainly AJ can be free and independent and biased, no? Think Rupert Murdoch.

Can you not imagine a sense of the term "independent" in which they ARE mutually exclusive? Eek seemed to know what I meant...but oh yeah, he's a genius...I guess I should target a different audience next time because I keep forgetting it's not just the two of us...
 
eek.

eek.

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Reaction score
4
X is in the industry tho, so our terms were probably misread because of that.

...no beer...sigh.
a cup of tea it is then.
 
docmercer--banned

docmercer--banned

Banned
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
22,231
Reaction score
0
Eek:

told you that you were a genius!! ol Parsons confirmed it tonite!!!

and since Bush is looking for a tutor ....
 

Marco

New member
Joined
Sep 25, 2000
Messages
4,257
Reaction score
0
Reality tv has an immense draw......I'd prefer to see what is actually happening than to see some watered down version the censors usually release.....

With politics and money involved it's anybody's guess as to how this will all turn out........
 
xpanda

xpanda

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Reaction score
4
Darryl Parsons said:
Can you not imagine a sense of the term "independent" in which they ARE mutually exclusive? Eek seemed to know what I meant...but oh yeah, he's a genius...I guess I should target a different audience next time because I keep forgetting it's not just the two of us...

I don't even know what you're trying to say here. But you still seem to be defending the idea that a free and independent (and by this I presume you mean privatised) Al Jazeera would be ipso facto unbiased. I still for the life of me cannot understand how you would come to this conclusion.

I think we're hard-pressed to find any media outlet that is unbiased, and the vast majority of them in these parts are privately owned. Fox, CNN, CTV etc are all privately held, and all are extremely biased, no question.

If AJ goes private, there's a more than reasonable chance it will be bought up by American or American-friendly interests, which just means the bias will shift, no? Isn't this really the preferred outcome you hint at?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,141,208
Messages
13,916,747
Members
104,791
Latest member
mariennell
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com