I've been tracking the accuscore plays for a while now without playing them as I've been searching for a good way to use it. Well, I've found that the plays that are at 60% have been hitting very nicely. While I only recently kept track of actual records, I do know it has been hitting at a nice clip. Those picks are 5-0-1 L6. For everyone's information, I will be posting those plays that Accuscore picks that have a 60% rating. Fade, follow or just watch, I just want a record here to see how exactly it does. I am going to begin actually playing these picks tomorrow. We will see.
The numbers you are looking at are STRAIGHT UP, NOT ATS. I do not care about SU and neither do most of the ppl on here. It was 60.2% that Houston would cover the spread. Suns are about 55% to cover the spread. Yes LAL are 77% to win SU. But again, nobody here cares about SU.
Look, I'm posting this to keep track and I am playing these plays. If you want to come into the thread to just start trying to prove the numbers wrong, please stay out. The numbers I post are CORRECT.
Look, I'm posting this to keep track and I am playing these plays. If you want to come into the thread to just start trying to prove the numbers wrong, please stay out. The numbers I post are CORRECT.
This can work decently. However, even if you go to their website it tells you what their records are in each sport, totals and all. Obviously if we could bank on 60% winners from them, we would all be doing it and be rich. I started using this and ended up purchasing the system which is basically more information and allows you to tweak things in games. Basically it allows me to build a system without having to do the IT leg work. From this, you can apply general betting rules and be very successful. I am constantly tweaking the rules and trying to come up with a system that can be played next year. I think if you play as you suggest you will end up between 45-55%. Nothing great, but you certainly aren't putting your bankroll at risk. Good luck.
As far as I saw, the website tracks total record and doesn't differentiate between a good pick (over 60%) and a slight play (say 51%). Granted the total win percentage isn't very impressive, that is why I'm trying to weed out the good picks and only track and play those. Like you said, worst case scenario is I break even or maybe lose a little, it shouldn't jeopardize my roll though.
2/27 Plays:
Mavs -9.5 60.2% chance of covering
There may be others, but not all lines are out and not all games have been completely run through Accuscore. I will update at about noon Pacific Time.
Record:
Posted record: 1-0
Record is 6-0-1 L7 though. I was only tracking it closely during this stretch but didn't post. I only mention it for informational purposes only.
Mavs -9.5 60.2% chance of covering
There may be others, but not all lines are out and not all games have been completely run through Accuscore. I will update at about noon Pacific Time.
Record:
Posted record: 1-0
Record is 6-0-1 L7 though. I was only tracking it closely during this stretch but didn't post. I only mention it for informational purposes only.
If there is, I haven't found it unfortunately. That's why the record I have is a small sample. While I've been looking at it for a while, I haven't kept a solid record for that long. As I said, it seems everytime I'd look at it and see a game at 60% or higher, it won at a pretty good clip. No losses in L7 is pretty impressive thus far. I am going to follow this from day one in MLB this year though and I will post all the picks in MLB forum for the season.
