Well, I’m pessimistic about this. Mainly because when these prosecutors are appointed, people go to jail. Someone in Trump’s orbit will be indicted. Perhaps it will be Flynn?
Otherwise, the Democrats are poll testing impeaching the President and plan on running on it in 2018 (because they’re so interested in “truth” and stuff) not because it is good for America, but for political reasons.
The establishment has clearly decided they don’t like Trump and in fact that he shouldn’t finish his first term.
I appreciate your pessimism, and I've already said there's a whole demographic that wouldn't and won't know the truth no matter how obvious it becomes. But the important thing is that good and smart and reasonable people will know the difference, any questions or doubt in their minds can be put to rest, You can't reach the Schumers and the Pelosis and their flock, the WP & NYT & CNN & MSNBC & NBC & CBS & ABC & Time will all lie about the results, whatever they may be, because they're consumed with hate and they appeal to ignorance.
Remember the Plame investigation? It took a Special Prosecutor 15 minutes to determine a crime wasn't committed, Plame was not a covert operative and hadn't been for several years. Not sure why it took a special prosecutor to determine that, even the fucking idiots can learn that on their own.
But the investigation continued, and Scooter Libby took a fall because he said he learned who Plame was some two weeks later than "he knew or should have known her name". He was at a meeting when her name was mentioned.
No crime was committed in outing Plame, nobody outed Plame, Plame's name was not part of some inappropriate leak from the administration, why the fuck should anybody care about Plame?
So an investigation into a crime that was never committed winds up reeling in a man who was essentially accused of covering up a crime that never happened. Only in libtarded minds does this stuff make sense.
