For the record I'm not interested in personal attacks, I'll leave that for those on the rail. I understand the logic in repeatedly bringing it up though, there's an old saying no one likes to call someone a drunk more than a true alcoholic. If I ask a question that is unpopular I expect it to come, just don't ask me to get involved in it any longer, thankfully I'm not in the business so my reputation in the forums is not a concern of mine.
Anyway back to the topic. The reason I asked for more info about why Ken later did more research is because the timetable stood out to me. His explanation makes sense but the point I was trying to get at is what if this was not an advertiser we were talking about? I asked did he take an ass chewing because that seemed the most logical to me, why would you spread the misinformation about a book paying us Ken!!? It's clear something came up which prompted him to take a closer look, I believe the explanation he provided. But what if the book was not a paying advertiser? Would the same amount of diligence been done to get it right after that sort of stuff was posted? In another words what if Ken and Roberto had gotten information that 5 Dimes (just a random example) had lost 20 million dollars, if Tony called up and said that was incorrect would the same effort been made to get it right? Would the Rx take his word that the rumors were not correct just like that? Anytime big loss figures like that are posted and then retracted it makes a lot of players feel uneasy, I promise you that.
Anyway I do appreciate the response, make no mistake I like Mansion and play there right now. They have paid on the dime every time I was lucky enough to ask for one. It's just when it comes to information released to suckers like myself I don't have many other means then forums like this to make decisions. When not one, but two sites come out with a strong statement on a book then admit they were off by $19,000,000.00 million dollars it is a little alarming to me. Like I asked above, what if the book was not chummy with the RX which had to absorb that blow out here in the forums? Or even worse what if Roberto and Ken had given 19 million dollars of too much credit to a book that advertised here? Maybe the book doesn't speak up about the error in that case and we never hear differently. Just saying, you need to be careful and have your ducks in a row when you come out with a strong statement of losses like this. In the real world people would have gotten sued for this. I like the RX, even with the personal shots I take I understand completely, I post here because I think it's ran clearly the best of the lot right now. But when the main man makes a post like this and days later admits a "mistake" that big then I don't think it's out of line to wonder how it all came about. I wasn't trying to be a hardass, I think a few inquiries were to be expected. Thanks again for the replies.
ffice
></o
