How would you feel if an “independent group” put an ad out the brought up Bush’s past and his substance abuse problems? How outraged would you be if the ad showed people describing Bush’s actions as a drunk and cocaine user? Would that be fair game in your opinion or is that untouchable because that was his personal life in the past? If this ad did come out, what would be your reaction?
Jay,
The difference would be that the ads would be true.
Even though BUSH LIED about his DWI conviction, it is a documented fact.
Even though BUSH DUCKS questions about his cocaine abuse he still snorted it.
Bush is a spineless cowardly sack of shit. He hides from Vietnam and then uses the media to attack a war hero ... a pathetic, pathetic piece of crap. His followers are nothing but unsuccessful cowardly shadows of him.
The difference would be that the ads would be true.
Even though BUSH LIED about his DWI conviction, it is a documented fact.
Even though BUSH DUCKS questions about his cocaine abuse he still snorted it.
Bush is a spineless cowardly sack of shit. He hides from Vietnam and then uses the media to attack a war hero ... a pathetic, pathetic piece of crap. His followers are nothing but unsuccessful cowardly shadows of him.
I don't like the one we have now.
I won't like whichever one of these two clown gets elected come November.
I probably won't like Hillary in 08'
The only good scenario would be if Kerry gets the nod and chokes on a pretzel or something, so that Sen. Edwards can run the show.
He seems to be the least deceptive of the bunch - not bad considering his field
I won't like whichever one of these two clown gets elected come November.
I probably won't like Hillary in 08'
The only good scenario would be if Kerry gets the nod and chokes on a pretzel or something, so that Sen. Edwards can run the show.
He seems to be the least deceptive of the bunch - not bad considering his field
Deserter looks objectively at the military record of George W. Bush, his role in the armed forces, and his treatment of them. Over the past year, Bush’s military poses have been contrived to convince the American public that he is a National Security President. Others have found his playacting less convincing. While George W. Bush supported the Vietnam War, his contribution was to enlist in a nepotistic unit of the Texas National Air Guard, which, short of World War III, was guaranteed never to see military action. Even in this safe position, Lieutenant Bush broke under the strain and went AWOL for the best part of a year. In contrast, American National Guardsmen have not only been called up for frontline action in Iraq, but they have had their terms of service extended. While the military budget soars, the war is being fought with a dangerously inadequate number of troops. The dead and disabled are shipped home under cover of darkness; those who eventually return in one piece find that their veterans’ medical benefits and facilities are being axed. Deserter strips away the illusion of Bush as "commander-in-chief" to reveal a hypocrite who has betrayed his troops and his country.
