9/11 Hoax- More No Planes Eyewitnesses

Search

"Things do not happen. Things are made to happen."
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Messages
2,624
Tokens
Reporter tries to get him to say he saw a plane- GETS CORRECTED. Lmfao!:nohead:


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_LaeCQEHaCM&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_LaeCQEHaCM&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 

"Things do not happen. Things are made to happen."
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Messages
2,624
Tokens
And another: BOMBS - no Planes ! Get it sheeple ?


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_AfTyOyKEEQ&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_AfTyOyKEEQ&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 

New member
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
1,164
Tokens
You believe that idiot????

talk to the families of the people who were in those planes.

I cant believe how fuckin stupid you are
 

"Things do not happen. Things are made to happen."
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Messages
2,624
Tokens
Reporter Rick Leventhal -chief Fox News suck up and ball washer media whore says "THATS WHAT WE WERE TOLD- SECOND PLANE- WE SAW IT ON TELEVISION"
Comedy gold for you sheeple...:nohead:
 

New member
Joined
Mar 29, 2007
Messages
1,451
Tokens
darwinian, the families are the ones fighting the good fight. They are the ones who started 911 truth.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t-yscpNIxjI&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t-yscpNIxjI&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 

Banned
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
5,120
Tokens
So 2 huge 747's filled with jet fuel fly into a building at 400 mph and the building is supposed to just stand there? Those things were missles.

After they hit, they were burning the damn building and wearing away at the structure. The top dropped down like a hammer on the rest of the building. What is so difficult to understand about that?

Did any of you 9-11 conspiriacy guys read the 9-11 commission?
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
40,113
Tokens
So 2 huge 747's filled with jet fuel fly into a building at 400 mph and the building is supposed to just stand there? Those things were missles.

After they hit, they were burning the damn building and wearing away at the structure. The top dropped down like a hammer on the rest of the building. What is so difficult to understand about that?

Did any of you 9-11 conspiriacy guys read the 9-11 commission?
Ive been following this for awhile & the bldgs were built to withstand much bigger impacts & fires than that... The metel in the basement when they got down there months later was still red hot.... The black smoke coming from the bldgs before they came down was from a low temp fire also...Most of the jet fuel (high grade diesel) burned up at impact...There were many eyewitness reports of explosions on the lower floors before the bldgs came straight down.
 

Banned
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
5,120
Tokens
After the impact jet fuel went down the elevator shaft sending down a giant fireball and making a very loud noise.

The fires were extreme heat. People weren't jumping off the 101st floors because the fire wasn't hot.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
8/21/08

Feds: Fire Downed WTC Building 7 On 9/11

But Critics Say There Is Evidence Explosives Were Behind Demise Of Skyscraper Next To Twin Towers

Comments 263
GAITHERSBURG, Md., Aug. 21, 2008


(AP) <!-- sphereit start -->Federal investigators said Thursday they have solved a mystery of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks: the collapse of World Trade Center building 7, a source of long-running conspiracy theories.

The 47-story trapezoid-shaped building sat north of the World Trade Center towers, across Vesey Street in lower Manhattan. On Sept. 11, it was set on fire by falling debris from the burning towers, but skeptics have long argued that fire and debris alone should not have brought down such a big steel-and-concrete structure.

Scientists with the National Institute of Standards and Technology say their three-year investigation of the collapse determined the demise of WTC 7 was actually the first time in the world a fire caused the total failure of a skyscraper.

"The reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery," said Dr. Shyam Sunder, the lead investigator on the NIST team.

Investigators also concluded that the collapse of the nearby towers broke the city water main, leaving the sprinkler system in the bottom half of the building without water.

The building has been the subject of a wide range of conspiracy theories for the last seven years, partly because the collapse occurred about seven hours after the twin towers came down. That fueled suspicion that someone intentionally blew up the building in a controlled demolition.

Critics like Mike Berger of the group 9/11 Truth said he wasn't buying the government's explanation.

"Their explanation simply isn't sufficient. We're being lied to," he said, arguing that there is other evidence suggesting explosives were used on the building.

Sunder said his team investigated the possibility that an explosion inside the building brought it down, but found there was no large boom or other noise that would have occurred with such a detonation. Investigators also created a giant computer model of the collapse, based partly on news footage from CBS News, that they say shows internal column failure brought down the building.

Investigators also ruled out the possibility that the collapse was caused by fires from a substantial amount of diesel fuel that was stored in the building, most of it for generators for the city's emergency operations command center.

The 77-page report concluded that the fatal blow to the building came when the 13th floor collapsed, weakening a critical steel support column that led to catastrophic failure.

"When this critical column buckled due to lack of floor supports, it was the first domino in the chain," said Sunder.

The NIST investigators issued more than a dozen building recommendations as a result of their inquiry, most of which repeat earlier recommendations from their investigation into the collapse of the two large towers.

In both instances, investigators concluded that extreme heat caused some steel beams to lose strength, causing further failures throughout the buildings until the entire structure succumbed.

The recommendations include building skyscrapers with stronger connections and framing systems to resist the effects of thermal expansion, and structural systems designed to prevent damage to one part of a building from spreading to other parts.

A spokeswoman for the leaseholder of the World Trade Center, developer Larry Silverstein, praised the government's work.

"Hopefully this thorough report puts to rest the various 9/11 conspiracy theories, which dishonor the men and women who lost their lives on that terrible day," said Silverstein spokeswoman Dara McQuillen.

In discussing the findings, the investigator Sunder acknowledged that some may still not be convinced, but insisted the science behind their findings is "incredibly conclusive."

"The public should really recognize the science is really behind what we have said," he said, adding: "The obvious stares you in the face."
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
40,113
Tokens
After the impact jet fuel went down the elevator shaft sending down a giant fireball and making a very loud noise.

The fires were extreme heat. People weren't jumping off the 101st floors because the fire wasn't hot.
Yes the fires from the debris & furniture ect was hot to humans but not that hot to big steel beams made of high quality steel.... Read up on it some more... Also the people couldnt brethe either & were suffocating from all of that low heat thick black smoke.
 

Banned
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
5,120
Tokens
You don't jump 101 feet because of smoke, you do it because you are melting alive.

I am open minded and looked at both sides of the argument. As far as I am concerned, there is no argument.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
40,113
Tokens
You don't jump 101 feet because of smoke, you do it because you are melting alive.

I am open minded and looked at both sides of the argument. As far as I am concerned, there is no argument.
No skyscraper in the history of the world has ever collapsed by fire...Now all of a sudden we have 3 bldgs collapse by fire.Explain that.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
944
Tokens
wow c-gold, wow.

You have to ignore that kid. He thinks he's an investor and economic scholar. He still thinks that the US is the largest exporter of products. When questioned about what the US still exports he calls you a retard. I've already came to the conclusion that he is not worth my time. And I'm about to come to that conclusion with all the bigot right wing fascists on this damn site. Maybe I'll stick to football on here and not waste my time.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
7,373
Tokens
There was certainly something fishy going on & I think the Jewish guy that owned the bldgs knew all about it in advance... The Insurance Co should sue this guy for their money back.... I think it was a plot to get the Military over in the middle east to be a form of protection for the overly mollycoddled Jews... No way those bldgs could have come straight down like that w/o extra help from more explosives & Bldg 7 was a straight demolision... Those bldgs were built to withstand a impact like that.... This govt knowing about it?....Not at the high levels...I believe the 2nd impact was a plane not a bomb...The PA crash they said was just a big hole with no plane wreckage... I believe the post & the vids to be mostly true but not totally true...Why did the Govt pay the victims families also?.... Too many questions & not enough answers.......................??

Wow! Didn't know you were a non-believer in the governments narrative about what happened on 9/11. :103631605
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
40,113
Tokens
Nah I think there burying the real truth under the guise of "National Security" They say the Pentagon there was no plane wreckage either.
 

Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
5,905
Tokens
10351-Saturn__D_.jpg


:think2:
 

New member
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
1,842
Tokens
i understand that the towers were supposed to withstand fire and a even more severe attack but wasnt that in the 70's or whenever the towers were built, im guessing planes and fuel have advanced a great deal.

i saw the video on the plane that hit the one tower and it looked like a big miltary jet with no windows

im on the fence about this because im puzzled about the pentagon. There is absolutely no way the governemnt can say a plane hit it and make me believe it
 

"Things do not happen. Things are made to happen."
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Messages
2,624
Tokens
<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR title="Post 5691307" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>roadreeler57</TD><TD class=alt2>Nah I think there burying the real truth under the guise of "National Security" They say the Pentagon there was no plane wreckage either.</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

RR - Goodbye bizarro world. Welcome to the real world. For many people the Pentagon is the easiest to understand was faked because they werent able to program you with repetitive visual images of planes like they did with the WTC. And the hole was no bigger than a street hooker's. They messed up the light poles too. They had them yanked out of the ground instead of clipped like in the real crash that occured years ago out of Dulles airport which destroyed the plane after hitting them with wing debris to show for it. All that drag would have certainly caused Flight 77 to lose altitude instantly and the video they put out shows the plane too low to not have skidded on the untouched grass without leaving a mark. Yet you are supposed to believe that after this the lightweight aluminum fuselage can go through three layers of the Pentagon and leave no wing marks on the building? Oh yeah- some witness's told the same story as the WTC - that they did see what looked like a plane come out of nowhere with no sound and "melt" - not crash into the Pentagon. Clearly signs of holographic projection here too. Again - Im giving the sheep credit for seeing something but still they are unable to make any positive identification of the small amout of plane parts they had onsite. They wont release the CCTV tapes. Acting in such a way that any good detective would say displays conciousness of guilt doesnt help their case either. Plus look at the flight plan. Radar tracks showing the aircraft over shot the place by 40 miles and were givin all the time they needed to double back and do an impossible 270 degree turn and come in 5 ft off the groung not allowing for topographical changes at ground level ? And top pilots saying the manuver would be hard enough to make for a F-15 fighter jet never mind a flying bus like a commuter jet is. You could go on and on about the clusterfuck of mistakes they made in doing it this way.

Remember rusfeld comes out the day before and says we lost track of 2 trillion. I kid you not RR guess what part of the Pentagon was struck. The accounting section that was investigating the dissaperance of this money !
They had it traced and had names - but of course when the employees got back they were told all the info was destroyed. They got the message and called it off. To this day no one will reinvestigate where the 2 trillion dollars went. :nohead:
 

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Tokens
I've already came to the conclusion that he is not worth my time. And I'm about to come to that conclusion with all the bigot right wing fascists on this damn site. Maybe I'll stick to football on here and not waste my time.
Once they got rid of the Doc Mercer division the road to final victory was wide open.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,901
Messages
13,574,972
Members
100,882
Latest member
topbettor24
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com